Saudis have backed out of the peace deal.
Hamas was worried that Saudis shaking hands with Israel will cause others to follow and soon Hamas will lose support.
Iran was anyways not happy since Saudi Israel deal (US brokered) was against Iran.
Status quo maintained. A few thousand people died in the process. Idiots on Twitter debating this conflict on basis of religion, history, morality and what not have no clue it seems.
randomradio's tactics:Er... Both sides are the bad guys. I've been saying it since day 1.
Only we Indians are the good guys.
randomradio's tactics:
Defend Russia -> Russia becomes indefensible - > "They're both bad guys." -> Wait for people to forget -> Go back to defending Russia.
There's no question that Russia is thousands of times more corrupt than Ukraine, because Russia is corruption incarnate. Russia is ruled by gangsters.I doubt Ukraine is less corrupt than Russia.
They're fighting for imperialism, oppression, corruption, genocide, and war crimes. Those are your good guys.Nope. My day 1 argument has been both sides are bad guys, but the Russians are the good guys in the Ukraine war.
For the dim bulbs out there who haven't understood that Russia is aligned with Hamas, here's Kadyrov spelling it out:
They're fighting for imperialism, oppression, corruption, genocide, and war crimes. Those are your good guys.
I know. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy.The Ukrainians are saying the same thing about the Russians, it's normal.
No great power or state with such aspiration can be classified as "good guys".Er... Both sides are the bad guys. I've been saying it since day 1.
Only we Indians are the good guys.
Uh, how? I can understand calling the West bad guys, but there is no way that Russians are the good guys there.Nope. My day 1 argument has been both sides are bad guys, but the Russians are the good guys in the Ukraine war.
Don't spit on imaginary stories.The power of imaginary stories.
Uh, how? I can understand calling the West bad guys, but there is no way that Russians are the good guys there.
Don't spit on imaginary stories.
Buddy, bad guys are always bad guys. Invaded a country twice, committed war crimes including the rape, execution of civilians and the kidnap of children, then sponsored a terrorist organisation to do the exact same in another country. It's the same leopard and they're the same damn spots.Nope. My day 1 argument has been both sides are bad guys, but the Russians are the good guys in the Ukraine war. Now, they are the bad guys when against Israel.
Notice how all their patsies are bad guys too. What a strange coincidence huh?But at the same time I had also pointed out that the Russians will most definitely activate their patsies to distract the US. I named both Iran and NoKo. And we now know the patsies they chose first were the Iranians. NoKo requires more conventional capabilities, and China also serves as enough for a distraction for now.
Sounds like something bad guys would do.After messing up the ME, their next target is either the Caucasus or CAR, my bet on the former. Then comes CAR.
Seeing a pattern here aren't we?After CAR, we will either get NoKo or Europe, starting with Serbia/Kosovo.
Putin acting criminally for a decade is somehow the West's fault again. Ukraine made a choice in 2014 and it was their choice to make about the future of their own country - they chose the EU over the EEU, stop trying to blame this no-brainer economic choice on the West.This is just the West now winning their stupid prize after Russia played their hand. I guess they accelerated the plan 'cause the peace deal was coming up next month or so.
They were fine with invading and annexing Crimea and pseudo-annexing the Donbas. I was fine with stealing this family's car and daughter officer, but they tried stop me, so I shot them all... so it's all their fault really.'Cause they didn't want a war. They were fine with only autonomy for Donbas, with Ukraine (including Donbas) practically doing anything they want except joining NATO. If you read the Minsk agreements and compare that to today, you know the Russians were right.
Manga comics are more realisttic than your logic.Unfortunately, only the manga side understands it's all imaginary.
Buddy, bad guys are always bad guys. Invaded a country twice, committed war crimes including the rape, execution of civilians and the kidnap of children, then sponsored a terrorist organisation to do the exact same in another country. It's the same leopard and they're the same damn spots.
Notice how all their patsies are bad guys too. What a strange coincidence huh?
Sounds like something bad guys would do.
Seeing a pattern here aren't we?
Putiin actiing criminally for a decade is somehow the West's fault again. Ukraine made a choice in 2014 and it was their choice to make about the future of their own country - they chose the EU over the EEU, stop trying to blame this no-brainer economic choice on the West.
They were fine with invading and annexing Crimea and pseudo-annexing the Donbas. I was fine with stealing this family's car and daughter officer, but they tried stop me, so I shot them all... so it's all their fault really.
1. The Russians always had troops in the Donbas and were therefore never compliant with Minsk.
2. Minsk was illegal, the equivalent of breaking into a house with a gun, pointing it at their kids' heads and asking them to sign over their car and garage. The consequences of not signing Minsk was what we have now and a contract signed under duress has no legal standing. JFC, I'm sure the British Empire made plenty of Indians sign things to, so that would make India in the wrong by your bizarre, dogsh1t logic.
Manga comics are more realisttic than your logic.
It was equivalent to a seige negotiation with hostage-takers - buying time while SWAT get into place.Then the West wouldn't had those talks.
1. Proxy wars existed a long time before that.This problem started in 1948-49, ever since the US and the West legalized such proxy wars by allowing Pakistan to invade Kashmir even against our best efforts.
I'm afraid Islamic terrorism existed some time before then. Back then they were only attacking invaders in their own country, not civilians at home and abroad, so not actually terrorism.We tried telling you the same when you created Islamic terrorism in the 80s. I told ya, only we are the good guys, the rest of you need dunce caps and a time out.
No... even that is more plausible than your 'logic'.Still much more realistic than religion.
From what I know, Minsk agreements were a result of separatist rebellion to begin with. That is like saying Croatia should have accepted Plan Z-4.'Cause they didn't want a war. They were fine with only autonomy for Donbas, with Ukraine (including Donbas) practically doing anything they want except joining NATO. If you read the Minsk agreements and compare that to today, you know the Russians were right.