Jammu & Kashmir live updates: GOI remove all provisions of Article 370

I have my In-laws in Jammu and as very senior police officers of JKP.


Downtown Srinagar have strict curfew with multiple checking. You need an airport ticket or,police pass for most of the day. It is relaxed a bit in the evening from what I can gather

However,in uptown Srinagar, restrictions are low


In most of south Kashmir, no violence, few instincts of stone pelting by small groups,peaceful across Kashmir with few small exception.


--source "Kashmir students Telegram channel" many of them managed to get calls from family through Police station telephone. Few others got call due to Jio glitch , peoples with postpaid connection from another states can sometimes make calls out of Kashmir
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Sam and GuardianRED
You can't attach any malafide with it as it is a constitutional amendment passed by 2/3rd majority in both houses. You probably did not read the retort Adv ML SHARMA got from SC today regarding this very issue. he has filed a PIL requesting scrapping of this constitutional amendment on similar basis as what you have posted here.
read up.. it is quashed with the following observation "A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana, declining the request to hear the matter urgently, said: "The matter would be placed before the appropriate bench, that is the bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, for listing the matter.""

Which means that the request is not rejected as is.. and will be looked into, by a bench of CJ?

Am i misreading it?
 
read up.. it is quashed with the following observation "A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana, declining the request to hear the matter urgently, said: "The matter would be placed before the appropriate bench, that is the bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, for listing the matter.""

Which means that the request is not rejected as is.. and will be looked into, by a bench of CJ?

Am i misreading it?

yes- the only question here is on timing.
 
read up.. it is quashed with the following observation "A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana, declining the request to hear the matter urgently, said: "The matter would be placed before the appropriate bench, that is the bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, for listing the matter.""

Which means that the request is not rejected as is.. and will be looked into, by a bench of CJ?

Am i misreading it?
My post was about the retort he got when he mentioned UN. he was asked can UN upturn any act which is passed by Indian Parliament?
 
He is bluffing...Written all over it.....Knowing this guy...

He said he was NOT looking at military option.

If there is to be a military action by either side, it will have to lead to war. Hit and runs won't serve either sides' intent (unless Pakistani intent is to feed its domestic propaganda machine), and will more than likely warrant a full scale response from the other.

In the state of readiness we are at right now...in the current situation I must say India is far more prepared for a war in Kashmir than Pak is.

Confirmed by Indian media as well.

Not heard anything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Yashpatel604