Will be signed in second qtr. MKI1A changes were demanded by IAF itself.
So what has been achieved in last 3 years
Ever since MK 1 A was approved and Sanctioned
Will be signed in second qtr. MKI1A changes were demanded by IAF itself.
So what has been achieved in last 3 years
Ever since MK 1 A was approved and Sanctioned
So what has been achieved in last 3 years
Ever since MK 1 A was approved and Sanctioned
" You need to give it to the Cobham guys. The performance they gave for the Mk1 was phenomenal. Till RBE2 shows up, the Mk1 radar is the best we have. Bars may have the range, but Mk1 have the clarity. To give a simile, Bars will be like a 20X digital zoom, while Mk1 will be like 10X optical zoom. "
Credits : Dileep from BR
Too good a quote to not post.
Second quarter? Report was that the deal would be signed during defexpo in lucknow in Feb next month..Will be signed in second qtr. MKI1A changes were demanded by IAF itself.
" You need to give it to the Cobham guys. The performance they gave for the Mk1 was phenomenal. Till RBE2 shows up, the Mk1 radar is the best we have. Bars may have the range, but Mk1 have the clarity. To give a simile, Bars will be like a 20X digital zoom, while Mk1 will be like 10X optical zoom. "
Credits : Dileep from BR
Too good a quote to not post.
I think he's talking about the Mk1A's radar. 'Cause the Bars is still better than the Mk1's radar. And RBE-2AA will be in India this year, whereas Mk1A is quite some time away.
No he is talking about mk1 radar only.
Praising Cobham radome..
Mk1A will have radome designed by Israel and made by HAL it seems
Then it's unlikely to be true. It goes against basic physics.
Not now. The negotiations for 83 has been on for a while. I don't think there will be any changes in the last minute. Maybe the numbers for Mk2 will change, but that's another debate.Can we expect a change in number from 83 ?
Not now. The negotiations for 83 has been on for a while. I don't think there will be any changes in the last minute. Maybe the numbers for Mk2 will change, but that's another debate.
Could as well be true tooI read the last part.. " But that's for another decade. "