Not sure why a well determined enemy who came well prepared for a WAR to humiliate us in front of the world and our neighbors chose to say we don't have any hostages despite India media reporting it ? Will acknowledging the fact they they IA men as hostages not help them in achieving their goal of humiliating us further ? . There can only be two reason for Chinese to do this , either they are in a f@cked up situation or we gave them what they want . Listening to you i am having some hope but
@Falcon makes me think negative , dont know what to believe sir .........just like every indians i am too going the same helplessness what i went through during previous governments .
Finding truth is like digging gold. You have to filter a lot of useless sand to find gold. Same is true about the present. Chinese wanted to humiliate us before they turn their guns towards Taiwan. They had given us a lollypop of GB if we joined CPEC. All thru they have wanted us to join CPEC as it is turning out to be a dead investment for them and only a market like India could give them the returns they wanted. Their aim was to threaten India and seek joining CPEC as concession and also establish themselves as undisputed leader of Asia. They needed the economy of Taiwan to support their south going economy. The aim to take over hongkong and Taiwan are part of that effort to bolster their economy which might soon come under US sanctions.
But they miscalculated grossly and in their inflated ego, they tried to humiliate India and attacked our troops. I do support the statement of
@Falcon that the CO had no reason to play Rambo and be there. However, I am a positive thinker and always look to the better side of things. In my childhood, our school Principal had told us to be goond graahak-The seeker of vituosity. Have Hansa pravitri and not kaag pravitri.
Let us assume that instead of the CO, other officer had led this de-escalation checking patrol and they had been killed in the similar manner. What would have happened. The topbrass would have prevailed on the CO not to retaliate and our humiliation would have been complete. Chinese would have achieved what they wanted. But The death of the CO forced remainder of troops including officers to launch a suicidal murdurous assault against far superior strength of enemy and result is for all to see. Chinese have got humiliated and not India.
Now coming to what you mentioned. Did we Indians go into their territory? did we start the build up? did we pitch tents across LAC? Why would an enemy who came prepared to fight us, will keep quiet about the injuries suffered by us when he has in his possession our troops which included four officers? They would have been the best propaganda for them to achieve their aim. But they did no such thing. What prevented them from doing it?
Some can argue that it was done for post war negotiations or to keep a door open for further negotiations. But why would you want to do it if you had achieved what you wanted. Victor takes it all. Victors write the history. What forced China to keep it hidden from the world that it was holding IA officers and men hostage?
Think about it and let me know what answers or question will you have while going thru these points. Also please remember that IA had wargamed umpteen times in Aksai Chin. They know the area better than PLA. Don't you think that a standoff which had been on for over 45 days, IA will not have made its own plans to counter such incidents by PLA.
IA did have such plans in place and they were set in motion on the night of 15-16. Every top brass in Leh knew what will happen if they tried to stop the soldiers of 16th Bihar from retaliating when their CO had been killed. CO has the status of a demigod in Paltan and he is the mybaap of every officer and men. Chinese were shocked to being frozen in action and did not know what has hit them. Winning an ambush is one thing and fighting a pitched battle is entirely different game.
We did not speak about PLA captives as our own were held captive. But why did PLA keep silent? Was it because we also held their soldiers and officers captive? If you find someother answer to my question please enlighten me.
Giving one side of story to bash political leadership is not what any prudent man will ever do. People with political agenda do it. This is a forum where we share what we think and know. It is not a forum to propagate one's political leanings. We have separate threads for that. This thread is about present stand off and only truth as one may know should be posted here without anykind of political leanings. Remember, a very thin line diffentiates armed forces and political leadership. Armed forces of a nation are the extension of political will of a nation. We must not engage in a propaganda which can bring bring bad name to our armed forces who have stood by the constitution of India even at the peril of their lives. This is part of the oath we all took when we became officers.