2017.
It has nothing to do with going to war. We can say they are preparing for war when the USMC starts landing exercises in the SCS with other countries and allies like Japan and Australia.
What they are doing right now is pretty much a Trump reelection campaign, nothing to do with India.
But it’s worth noting that, in the out-years of Canberra’s strategic plan, the air force plans to buy new tankers. “New investment will include larger replacement fleets,” the government stated. Doubling the tanker fleet might allow the air force to keep four fighters on station instead of just two.
@randomradio instead of answering you pointwise I am leaving this tweet.
Do check both of them and ponder.
China is the new age version of Nazi Germany.
VIPUL021969 (@vipul021969) Tweeted:
@Nrg8000 It is the time for Bhutan to merge with India. Necessary amendments should be done in Indian constitution to grant special status to Bhutan king with maximum autonomy. It is better to be a part of democracy with same culture rather than the slave of oppressor dictatorial regime.
China may also deploy S-400 near LAC, if a war appears imminent. Besides the military utility of the AD system, another reason for the deployment could be a political one i.e. To force Russia, to put pressure on India to de-escalate. Because India will strike and try to neutralize chinese S-400 in the early stages of the conflict. If India succeeds in destroying S-400, it would land a devastating blow to the mythology surrounding S-400, and lead to a reduction in russian armament exports..HQ 9 is not a problem. It can be taken out any time The real issue is S400.
I had written earlier also that it is not S-400 but only some elements of it which may have been shifted to Aksai Hind as China needs them to protect the eastern sea board.China may also deploy S-400 near LAC, if a war appears imminent. Besides the military utility of the AD system, another reason for the deployment could be a political one i.e. To force Russia, to put pressure on India to de-escalate. Because India will strike and try to neutralize chinese S-400 in the early stages of the conflict. If India succeeds in destroying S-400, it would land a devastating blow to the mythology surrounding S-400, and lead to a reduction in russian armament exports..
That's not how it will work. If the apprehension is that India may take out S400 at the very start, India will tell Russia to ask China to not deploy them in the first place or their market will be badly hit! Nobody is going to deescalate because Russia doesn't want to lose face as its S400 may be taken out! LOLChina may also deploy S-400 near LAC, if a war appears imminent. Besides the military utility of the AD system, another reason for the deployment could be a political one i.e. To force Russia, to put pressure on India to de-escalate. Because India will strike and try to neutralize chinese S-400 in the early stages of the conflict. If India succeeds in destroying S-400, it would land a devastating blow to the mythology surrounding S-400, and lead to a reduction in russian armament exports..
I had written earlier also that it is not S-400 but only some elements of it which may have been shifted to Aksai Hind as China needs them to protect the eastern sea board.
China may also deploy S-400 near LAC, if a war appears imminent. Besides the military utility of the AD system, another reason for the deployment could be a political one i.e. To force Russia, to put pressure on India to de-escalate. Because India will strike and try to neutralize chinese S-400 in the early stages of the conflict. If India succeeds in destroying S-400, it would land a devastating blow to the mythology surrounding S-400, and lead to a reduction in russian armament exports..
China does not have S-500. They have only S300 & 400. They have made copies of S-300 and they have just three regiments of S400 which are deployed on the eastern seaboard.How many s400 and 500 systems does china has?
With 3 carriers, US is just signalling intent to protect Taiwan and enforce freedom of navigation which is a stated policy objective for the US. The deployment also helps India by keeping the cream of the PLAN tied up. That between themselves, the carriers pack ~140 fighters, not to mention Airborne Radars and we have China keeping air units in the sector as well.
That is pretty much it. US going to war is EXPENSIVE and Trump can be really miserly at times.