Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

How have they got us beat though? I understand that a proper invasion will break an Indian defense. But the t72's are as capable as whatever the Pakistanis have in their infantry. There is not a major difference in terms of protection and the al Khalid's and t 80 can be taken out by atgm's and even t72 apfsds is enough for them. We are not facing invulnerable tanks with aps like ztz 99a. The vt 4 themselves are not as good in terms of protection. Our older armour can hold against with the major enemy tanks. It's the training that will make the difference for the tank crews.

A strike corps against a RAPIDs is still overkill in terms of numbers. The PA's I Strike Corps is actually equipped with the Al-Zarrar, so our T-72s are better.

However an armoured division reinforced with an independent armoured brigade can be as much as 7 tank regiments for our 3 regiments. But the problem can be solved by attaching our own independent armoured brigade, thereby increasing numbers to 6 on our side. And these new regiments could be the T-90s.

But where they have us beat is in terms of speed. If we fail to defend before we are able to reinforce the position, then they get immediate control over a road to Rajouri, which they can extend later on to the next road in Katra, while cutting off Rajouri from India. We can then reinforce Rajouri only from Kashmir after that, which is not easy. Basically, it's not a headache we want to deal with when facing China. Hence it's a weakness for us.
 
A strike corps against a RAPIDs is still overkill in terms of numbers. The PA's I Strike Corps is actually equipped with the Al-Zarrar, so our T-72s are better.

However an armoured division reinforced with an independent armoured brigade can be as much as 7 tank regiments for our 3 regiments. But the problem can be solved by attaching our own independent armoured brigade, thereby increasing numbers to 6 on our side. And these new regiments could be the T-90s.

But where they have us beat is in terms of speed. If we fail to defend before we are able to reinforce the position, then they get immediate control over a road to Rajouri, which they can extend later on to the next road in Katra, while cutting off Rajouri from India. We can then reinforce Rajouri only from Kashmir after that, which is not easy. Basically, it's not a headache we want to deal with when facing China. Hence it's a weakness for us.

Any Armoured attack by Pakistan in Jammu Sector or anywhere along the LOC will invite a counter attack in Punjab and Rajasthan

They know it very well

And we have secured the 198 KM Jammu sector very well

The Jammu border is full of kinks and bends

We can Target their Tanks from
Many different angles and sides

We need sufficient Infantry and Artillery
Along with ATGMs to stop any armoured invasion by their 1 Strike.Corps
 
Any Armoured attack by Pakistan in Jammu Sector or anywhere along the LOC will invite a counter attack in Punjab and Rajasthan

They know it very well

And we have secured the 198 KM Jammu sector very well

The Jammu border is full of kinks and bends

We can Target their Tanks from
Many different angles and sides

We need sufficient Infantry and Artillery
Along with ATGMs to stop any armoured invasion by their 1 Strike.Corps

The logic for the Chinese is, if India ends up fighting Pakistan, then they get a significant advantage in a war with India. So whether we win or lose Jammu is irrelevant to them as long as their objectives at the LAC are achieved.

As far as we are concerned, it's in our interest to not fight Pakistan and China at the same time.

So it's possible that Pakistan may be forced into attacking Jammu by the Chinese. The servant's most likely going to end up doing their master's bidding.
 
The logic for the Chinese is, if India ends up fighting Pakistan, then they get a significant advantage in a war with India. So whether we win or lose Jammu is irrelevant to them as long as their objectives at the LAC are achieved.

As far as we are concerned, it's in our interest to not fight Pakistan and China at the same time.

So it's possible that Pakistan may be forced into attacking Jammu by the Chinese. The servant's most likely going to end up doing their master's bidding.

See if you have Observed Past India Pakistan stand offs , From 1990 onwards
In ALL of them , USA STOPPED INDIA
from unleashing its Army and Air force
on Pakistan

So if Pakistan initiates a conflict
there will be No restrictions on India to strike Pakistan

Pak Army Generals know this

Secondly and More Importantly we Only need USA Air Force Help in a Two Front War

Our Army is sufficiently strong to face Both China And Pakistan

So if US helps us by Bombing Chinese and Pakistani targets IAF can defeat
Both of them

If Both Pakistan and China are Hell Bent upon Attacking us we Will Need US support

That is what I have been saying since.
May 5
 
There are Full Time Army Officials
Who work on Strategies , Doctrines ,
New and Disruptive Technologies

We have several in house institutions
Engaged in research

Somehow self appointed experts believe
That ALL intelligent and knowledgeable
People are outside the Govt

India has only problem
LACK OF MONEY
The guy has a resume of a professional analyst and expert in strategy. He is no ordinary person. He has worked in government and private think tanks as a analyst.


I will certainly read what he says.
 
@randomradio

Read it. I don't want to selectively quote portions but it conveys what I long suspected and advocated. India's problem lies in South Block and not in economy. Money won't change the situation.

The author is a professional analyst with a resume to go with : https://1c7f8822-ae2c-465b-93b9-f5a...d/4733de_e78b8cc413814ca8a73d8b8a2330ef79.pdf
 

Eg-B85PXYAEimhk.jpg
Eg-B85OX0AAbduI.jpg