Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning and F-22 'Raptor' : News & Discussion

Maybe you should tell that to the Israelis who are integrating EA pods on the F-35 'cause even they say the F-35's stealth isn't enough.
Same Israeli F-35's that has been taking out targets over Syria penetrating S300's and Russian operated S400's

I know it must suck to be and Indian military enthusiast that sees itself as a military power when the truth is India is powerless in the air force realm or better said inferior to its neighbor to the north that flies over a 100 stealth fighters and designing another version whose schematics is similar to the F-35.

I'd be pissed too if I were Indian and US hasn't offered the F-35 knowing crappy Flankers no matter how much foreign tech is integrated isn't going to cut it in a modern war under high-tech conditions. I'd also be pissed off too as Indian that the most advanced fighter we got is a French 4th gen fighter that still lacks many of the advanced avionics US 4th gen fighters have had for years... and only have 36 of them meaning likely only 15 or less will be available for war. Yeah I'd also be pissing on the US made F-35 to make myself feel better knowing that first world countries and friends of US are allowed to buy the most advanced fighter to ever take the skies while we fly Russian crap and 36 French fighters.

In my Indian mind I'd start lying to myself telling myself Rafale didn't really lose in Switzerland it was a conspiracy to please the US the same for Finland... :rolleyes:
 
Same Israeli F-35's that has been taking out targets over Syria penetrating S300's and Russian operated S400's
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israe...t-hamper-Older Forum-air-campaign-over-syria/


Russia was given roughly five minutes warning via a deconfliction line before the strikes, launched from both sea and from planes in Lebanese air space, hit the target; the strikes resulted in the deaths of three Syrian soldiers, per media reports, but no Russian casualties.


I know it must suck to be and Indian military enthusiast that sees itself as a military power when the truth is India is powerless in the air force realm or better said inferior to its neighbor to the north that flies over a 100 stealth fighters and designing another version whose schematics is similar to the F-35.

I'd be pissed too if I were Indian and US hasn't offered the F-35 knowing crappy Flankers no matter how much foreign tech is integrated isn't going to cut it in a modern war under high-tech conditions. I'd also be pissed off too as Indian that the most advanced fighter we got is a French 4th gen fighter that still lacks many of the advanced avionics US 4th gen fighters have had for years... and only have 36 of them meaning likely only 15 or less will be available for war. Yeah I'd also be pissing on the US made F-35 to make myself feel better knowing that first world countries and friends of US are allowed to buy the most advanced fighter to ever take the skies while we fly Russian crap and 36 French fighters.



As you can see sweetie , plenty of material online to debunk your pet notions . Don't ever feel shy of asking . We're always delighted to be of assistance.

In my Indian mind I'd start lying to myself telling myself Rafale didn't really lose in Switzerland it was a conspiracy to please the US the same for Finland... :rolleyes:

And why would we be bothered about Rafales not being selected by Switzerland or Finland just as I imagine why would they be bothered we did . Any more silly trailer park level analysis you want negated , sweetie ?
 

1673432093775.png
 
Lol. Stealth is the be all you dope which is why all 1st world nations/mega air forces are buying them or making their own.
No sweetie(hope @_Anonymous_ doesnt mind), I am dead right. If stealth is be all and end all then why Chinese are trying new supercruising engines as well the Russians. Why F-22 Raptor has super maneuverability plus supercruise along with stealth!

Because, no amount of sensors can make speed/agility redundant against a peer enemy. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just being asinine.
Which the F-35 has but isn't as important as SA, EW and EODAS which gives the F-35 the ability to kill any fighter without turning. F-35 is as agile as the F-18 and F-16 and there's plenty of videos of F-18's gunning SU-30's in dogfight exercises.
Plenty of videos of F-18 gunning Su-30? Lol, no. Just one. There is also a picture of Hornet putting its piper on F-22. So?

Anyways, that video is from Gonky. He categorically said that Su-30 MKM gunned F-18 too but he didn't record it. He is an ex Us Navy pilot. He said Su-30MKM is the toughest fight other than fighting F-22 Raptor. So even as per him, in WVR: MKM=F-22.

Here is the proof:
Screenshot_20230111-172639_YouTube.jpg


Screenshot_20230111-172736_YouTube.jpg



Also at your home F-16. net, F-35 is getting wrecked by operational US Navy/Marine/Air Force pilots. Both Hornet and F-16 is being preferred as a dogfighter over F-35. I know it hurts you, but acknowledge it dude that F-35 sucks.


Lol. What are you some Indian prophet that knows how air to air engagements will take place? Puh-leeze! That's your wish how air to air engagements should be to justify India not having any stealth fighters and flying outdated 4th gen fighters.
No that's what all the experts believe.
Rafale and Flankers will never know what killed them if they ever take on F-35's. Not even French Rafale pilots are this stupid they know they don't stand a chance against the F-35 in real combat.

Lol. How in your nutty world is an F-35 going to get caught?

You're one delusional kid that likes to make up scenarios that puts 4th gen fighters in some weird advantaged that are far from reality.
Rafale piloted by Indian Air Force and Indian Navy pilots would whoop F-35 10 out of 10 times.

MKI is the king of WVR. It slays even the Raptor there. Comparing it with F-35 is kind of insulting. Post MLU, it will take down any fighter whether stealthy or not in BVR as well.
 
Same Israeli F-35's that has been taking out targets over Syria penetrating S300's and Russian operated S400's

I know it must suck to be and Indian military enthusiast that sees itself as a military power when the truth is India is powerless in the air force realm or better said inferior to its neighbor to the north that flies over a 100 stealth fighters and designing another version whose schematics is similar to the F-35.

I'd be pissed too if I were Indian and US hasn't offered the F-35 knowing crappy Flankers no matter how much foreign tech is integrated isn't going to cut it in a modern war under high-tech conditions. I'd also be pissed off too as Indian that the most advanced fighter we got is a French 4th gen fighter that still lacks many of the advanced avionics US 4th gen fighters have had for years... and only have 36 of them meaning likely only 15 or less will be available for war. Yeah I'd also be pissing on the US made F-35 to make myself feel better knowing that first world countries and friends of US are allowed to buy the most advanced fighter to ever take the skies while we fly Russian crap and 36 French fighters.

In my Indian mind I'd start lying to myself telling myself Rafale didn't really lose in Switzerland it was a conspiracy to please the US the same for Finland... :rolleyes:
No, in fact most Indian defence enthusiasts are extremely pleased that we have MKI and Rafale. We don't want your F-35.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand this to and fro. The F-35 is still under development. It does the job it is supposed to do. Penetrate air defence and bomb and get back. And it will get better at it. Its never supposed to be a dogfighter. Nothing wrong in that.

Again, locking in to a fighter and bringing it down are 2 different things. Surviving the shot fired by it, something else. If the first look is by the 35, it fires, then the defender will first maneover to avoid the hit. Then try to get a firing solution. If it misses, then the defender has to lock, launch and then hit. In the same way, if the F-35 misses, against a peer opponent, you better pray that your ew will work, because your existing kinematics definitely will not.
 
No sweetie(hope @_Anonymous_ doesnt mind), I am dead right.
That term isn't mine. Sweetie himself came up with it when he'd talk down to everyone out here , when he first made his appearance out here a year & a half ago. Ever since I started giving it back to him he quickly abandoned his own terms. Ditto for his display photograph. I used to use it. He copied it forcing me to do the same. Long story short, we interchanged each other's DPs.
 
Low band radars may detect stealth planes, but tracking and shooting them is a whole different problem.
You are right.
But no object is fully invisible. Once the low band radar detect you, it gives a missile or a fighter a limited air zone where the opponent is. Without enough precision for a fire on the sole low band radar datas, but enough to guide the fighter or the missile close enough to use its own onboard radar or IR seeker to end the game.

And stealth fighters as F35 are not very clean aerodynamically, that means they need to use engine in a quite high power (this is why F35 despite 12 tons of thrust is not able to supercruise because shaped as a piece of sugar) : so IR detector are very keen to detect it because they are quite hot.
Supposedly NGAD is being designed as to defeat even low-band radars.
Only big bird can be stealth for low band radar, as B2 or B21. NGAD will be a fighter size plane, so not LB stealth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
I don't understand this to and fro. The F-35 is still under development. It does the job it is supposed to do. Penetrate air defence and bomb and get back. And it will get better at it. Its never supposed to be a dogfighter. Nothing wrong in that.
I wholeheartedly agree to what you wrote. But problem is F-35 fanboys, who continue to argue that it's a great dogfighter as well(which is far from truth).
Again, locking in to a fighter and bringing it down are 2 different things. Surviving the shot fired by it, something else. If the first look is by the 35, it fires, then the defender will first maneover to avoid the hit. Then try to get a firing solution. If it misses, then the defender has to lock, launch and then hit. In the same way, if the F-35 misses, against a peer opponent, you better pray that your ew will work, because your existing kinematics definitely will not.
Isn't this exactly what I am arguing. F-35 fanboys say that it would look first, shoot first and kill first from 100s of kms away. That's not possible against a peer level enemy. And if F-35 is caught or forced to fight then its kinematics fall way short.

That's why a 4++ gen plane like Rafale is perfect cause even if it gets caught, it's a vicious dogfighter as well besides being a great semi-stealth platform.
That term isn't mine. Sweetie himself came up with it when he'd talk down to everyone out here , when he first made his appearance out here a year & a half ago. Ever since I started giving it back to him he quickly abandoned his own terms. Ditto for his display photograph. I used to use it. He copied it forcing me to do the same. Long story short, we interchanged each other's DPs.
The way he reacts to your every post, seems like you're now fully in his head. Mr. Yank is obsessed with you it seems.
You are right.
But no object is fully invisible. Once the low band radar detect you, it gives a missile or a fighter a limited air zone where the opponent is. Without enough precision for a fire on the sole low band radar datas, but enough to guide the fighter or the missile close enough to use its own onboard radar or IR seeker to end the game.
Apparently Americans are testing a new chrome coloured RAM paint which reduces IR signature as well.
And stealth fighters as F35 are not very clean aerodynamically, that means they need to use engine in a quite high power (this is why F35 despite 12 tons of thrust is not able to supercruise because shaped as a piece of sugar) : so IR detector are very keen to detect it because they are quite hot.
Actually stealth fighters are always clean aerodynamically since they carry their weapons inside. F-35 is fat because it's a strike fighter. Needs to carry plenty of gas and weapons. Look at Su-57. Its aerodynamics are superlative.
Only big bird can be stealth for low band radar, as B2 or B21. NGAD will be a fighter size plane, so not LB stealth.
NGAD is going to be as big as F-111, so much bigger than Raptor. Plus, it would be tailless, so its stealth would be much broad-band than previous gen stealth fighters.

Don't underestimate the prowess of Uncle Sam. They are superpower for a reason. NGAD is designed to beat Su-57 and its future derivatives along with J-20 and Chinese future fighters. It's going to be an awesome plane.
 
Same Israeli F-35's that has been taking out targets over Syria penetrating S300's and Russian operated S400's

The Israelis take Russian permission before attacking targets near them. And the targets Israel is attacking are also targets the Russians want eliminated on the sly. It's why both are working together, it has nothing to do with technology.

I know it must suck to be and Indian military enthusiast that sees itself as a military power when the truth is India is powerless in the air force realm or better said inferior to its neighbor to the north that flies over a 100 stealth fighters and designing another version whose schematics is similar to the F-35.

I'd be pissed too if I were Indian and US hasn't offered the F-35 knowing crappy Flankers no matter how much foreign tech is integrated isn't going to cut it in a modern war under high-tech conditions. I'd also be pissed off too as Indian that the most advanced fighter we got is a French 4th gen fighter that still lacks many of the advanced avionics US 4th gen fighters have had for years... and only have 36 of them meaning likely only 15 or less will be available for war. Yeah I'd also be pissing on the US made F-35 to make myself feel better knowing that first world countries and friends of US are allowed to buy the most advanced fighter to ever take the skies while we fly Russian crap and 36 French fighters.

In my Indian mind I'd start lying to myself telling myself Rafale didn't really lose in Switzerland it was a conspiracy to please the US the same for Finland... :rolleyes:

Your argument would have been sound had the F-35 not been a hangar queen.

No, we are not pissed that we are not offered the F-35, we are pissed that the US offers the F-35, we reject them and the US then claims they rejected our request. :ROFLMAO:

The US was even interested in selling India the F-22.
Mr Muilenburg also flagged the F-22 Raptor, a fifth-generation fighter jointly developed with Lockheed Martin Corp, as a future sales prospect for India, calling it "an area of future investment for which we are interested".

The stuff of nightmares for you.

View attachment 25941

Lol, nearly 900 jets delivered and only IOC has been declared by foreign air forces.
 
I don't understand this to and fro. The F-35 is still under development. It does the job it is supposed to do. Penetrate air defence and bomb and get back. And it will get better at it. Its never supposed to be a dogfighter. Nothing wrong in that.

Again, locking in to a fighter and bringing it down are 2 different things. Surviving the shot fired by it, something else. If the first look is by the 35, it fires, then the defender will first maneover to avoid the hit. Then try to get a firing solution. If it misses, then the defender has to lock, launch and then hit. In the same way, if the F-35 misses, against a peer opponent, you better pray that your ew will work, because your existing kinematics definitely will not.

Innominate believes the F-35 is already the king of all fighters and is not a WIP. It apparently does grocery shopping too.
Only big bird can be stealth for low band radar, as B2 or B21. NGAD will be a fighter size plane, so not LB stealth.

NGAD could be as stealthy as the B-21 'cause it's expected to be tailless.
 
Apparently Americans are testing a new chrome coloured RAM paint which reduces IR signature as well.
what about the plume of the engine ?
And about the paint, it's OK for a slow moving target as tanks, but what about the kinetic heat of a fighter frame ?
NGAD could be as stealthy as the B-21 'cause it's expected to be tailless.
Not enough. In low bands overall size is key. And NGAD will never be as big as a B21
 
And stealth fighters as F35 are not very clean aerodynamically, that means they need to use engine in a quite high power (this is why F35 despite 12 tons of thrust is not able to supercruise because shaped as a piece of sugar) : so IR detector are very keen to detect it because they are quite hot.
F-35 is not able to supercruise mainly because of electricity generation. Its F135 has to remain within its best operating range ... That's not supercruise espacilally when it means that heat generation have to be managed by more cooling.
 
Last edited:
what about the plume of the engine ?
And about the paint, it's OK for a slow moving target as tanks, but what about the kinetic heat of a fighter frame ?

Not enough. In low bands overall size is key. And NGAD will never be as big as a B21
NGAD is going to be much more stealthy(almost in magnitude terms) than B-2 in all bands.

Size has got nothing to do with stealth. It is B-2's planform of flying wing design without tail that makes is so stealthy. If you make B-2 even more smaller, its stealth would increase in all Bands and not decrease.
F-35 is not able to supercruise mainly because of electricity generation. Its F135 has to remain within its best operating range ... That's not supercruise espacilally when it means that heat generation have to be managed by more cooling.
Not only that but look at the wing sweep aspect ratio(2.66 with 33° swept wings). It is not designed to supercruise at all.

As a Strike Fighter, it's great. But as an ASF it just sucks. No amount of sugar coating will ever change this fact.