Rafale DH/EH of Indian Air Force : News and Discussions

The problem is meteor and asraam can be easily integrated to the f-35 as seen from the u.k and Italian f-35's. So the only real advantage eurocanards have is lost because of this. Otherwise f-35 is actually inferior to eurocanards in terms of a2a funnily enough.
Nope. The LM offer only includes Sidewinder and AMRAAM. The idea behind this is that Finland will operate a similar configuration as the main user, in this case US Air Force. Of course it is possible that Meteor comes in the future, but it is not involved in the simulation/war gaming, Neither is ASRAAM. Norway is also only using AMRAAM and no Meteor.

The main user of Superbug is the US Navy, so the Finnish setup would resemble their setup.
Or the JASSM's can just be transferred to the f-35. Rafale does add up unnecessary training and integration costs which I don't know if the Finn's will be interested in. With f-35 it's only training for the system and rest of the weapon's portfolio remains similar to the hornet.
Nope again. JASSM is not integrated to F-35. JASSM-ER is coming in block 5. So new cruise missiles are needed anyways. The offer for both Superbug and F-35 includes JASSM-ER. The F-35 offer also includes Joint Strike Missile, JSM.

For Rafale, it's SCALP. Oh, and also JSM for Rafale.
 
Last edited:
Rafale-4Finland.png


This picture was used in Finland by Dassault. Top left, single Exocet. Top right, four JSM. Bottom right, two SCALP.

For more discussion, go to:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolwa
Nope. The LM offer only includes Sidewinder and AMRAAM. The idea behind this is that Finland will operate a similar configuration as the main user, in this case US Air Force. Of course it is possible that Meteor comes in the future, but it is not involved in the simulation/war gaming, Neither is ASRAAM. Norway is also only using AMRAAM and no Meteor.

The main user of Superbug is the US Navy, so the Finnish setup would resemble their setup.

Nope again. JASSM is not integrated to F-35. JASSM-ER is coming in block 5. So new cruise missiles are needed anyways. The offer for both Superbug and F-35 includes JASSM-ER. The F-35 offer also includes Joint Strike Missile, JSM.

For Rafale, it's SCALP. Oh, and also JSM for Rafale.
Well if that's the case Rafale might actually have a chance.
 
Well look at who all bought the Rafale. Egypt,Qatar,Greece and India. All use some amount of Russian hardware in a major way while they are also in good relations with the west. The Qataris are the only ones who are not using any Russian hardware but they do have a flexible foreign policy since they play against Saudis as well as Iran, while simultaneously cosying up with Israelis and use Al-Jazeera for propaganda against their opponents. French hardware is sanction free and matches up with American tech in most cases so buying it makes sense. Greece can buy the f35 so can the Qataris even India if it scraps the s400 deal.

Qatar was not offered the F-35 they are actually buying F-15's and they already fly Mirage-2000s so it's a no duh that they buy french planes. Greece made the decision to buy the French plane before F-35 was offered. Moment Turkey was kicked out Greece pounced and Greece like India will likely only get a couple dozen French planes as they start receiving F-35's. As for India it's more than the s400 that is the issue but s400 has been made the issue. Even if India scrapped the s400 they'd still be a lot of hurdles for any sale of F-35's to India.
Obviously look at the f-15k slam eagle deal and claims of U.S lobbying to force the Koreans to buy the f-15.

Oy vey. It's always the US forced but they always leave out Dassault bribes in SK... just like in India. Lets look back what the story was all about...

Bribery scandal shakes fighters deal​


SEOUL, March 11 (UPI) -- A South Korean military official was arrested on charges of receiving bribes from France's Dassault Aviation, a company that was considered one of the contenders for South Korea's $3.2 billion dollar fighter jet contract.

The bribery case could lead to the French aircraft maker being dropped from consideration. Dassault's Rafale aircraft and Boeing Co.'s F-15K are seen as front-runners for the contract. Also being considered are Eurofighter consortium's Typhoon 2000 and the Russian Sukhoi Su-32.

A special envoy from the French government visited South Korea Defense Minister Kim Dong-shin on Monday to the South Koreans to select the Rafale.

"The procurement project is very important to not only South Korea-France relations but South Korea-EU ties as well," said former French Ambassador to South Korea Jean Bernard Ouvrieu, according to Defense Ministry spokesman Hwang Eui-don.

The French envoy also expressed concerns that the Seoul government may yield to U.S. pressure to buy Boeing's F-15K, citing allegations that the Defense Ministry is favoring F-15K in consideration of its long-standing security alliance with the United States.

Last week, the French daily, La Tribune said that Dassault might not win the South Korean project because of political reasons even though its Rafale jet proved superior. South Korea's secret military report recently showed that Rafale fighters beat all its competitors, including Boeing's F-15K, during last year's test flights.

The French mission's visit came shortly after a South Korean Air Force officer, identified only by his family name, Cho, was arrested on a charge of taking $8,370 from Dassault's local agency, Comet, in exchange for key information on selection guidelines.

Cho, who served as a vice chief of the evaluation team, allegedly advised Comet to increase the scope of technology transfer and subcontracts for local aerospace companies, saying it would help win the contract. Cho was accused of keeping classified documents about the fighter evaluation without approval, officials said.

The scandal could result in elimination of Dassault from the competition to supply the South Korea Air Force with 40 jet fighters by 2008. Under provisional contracts signed last month, the Defense Ministry can cancel contracts if a bidder is confirmed to engage in illegal practices, including bribery.

So a frenchy who is butt hurt that they got caught is spreading rumors that US MIGHT pressure SK and a "secret military report" that nobody has seen, and that SK government has denied it came from them, says french plane beat out all its competitors... in what? What are the details of the report?

See the french plane fanboys always use this example when its plane and other weapon systems loses to US. They use this rumor started by a frenchy that US only won because of pressure. The frenchy's believe the only reason the F-35 won in Switzerland was because of "US pressure" and use the South Korea rumor as evidence.



Also M1 tanks or Bradley's don't give the amount of strategic overreach that f-35 does. M1 and Bradley's are 30 year old hardware with no big tech jumps unlike the f-35.
U.S naval ships are literally crown jewel tech they far far more valuable than the f35. I doubt the Americans will give zumwalt design to any of its allies(provided they can afford it in the first place.) The only ones using American naval hardware are the Koreans and Japanese who are both basically glorified American colonies. With naval radars and sm6 missiles. America won't even share that tech with any of its other partners

Oh so only when it's the F-35 or other fighters does US "grip" them, right? :unsure:
Rafale's can supercruise, f-35's cannot.

I always find this funny since supercruise is never brought up by Dassault or potential customers when it comes to the french planes capabilities. It's also funny that dassault doesn't even give an estimation of range of supercruise unlike they do with F-22 and F-35 that can "supercruise" at mach 1.2 over 150+ miles. It's almost as if dassault and potential customers are saying that supercruise is so irrelevant in combat that they don't bring it up. In fact supercruise is so irrelevant that they buy F-35's over fighters that can supposedly "supercruise..." say whaaa?
Rafale can carry similar maximum payloads of munitions (neither the the typhoon or the gripen are capable of that).

No it can't. Not with its three tanks.
It's much more maintenance friendly than the f-35.

Is it? In 2020, if we only count those of AdlA, they had a 62% MCR and it isn't that better today. French have 132 units of AdlA and only 80-82 are available..? That's horrid.
The f-35 does out do it in stealth and avionics with a bigger radar. But stealth is yet to be properly tested. Even though the concept has existed since the 90's

Lol. Stealth has been properly tested in 1991 over Baghdad where they had the second most dense IADS in the world after Moscow. B2s and F-117s also tested against IADS and of of the tens thousands of sorties B2 and F-117 combined have flown only one was shot down due to USAF incompetence. Stealth has existed since the 70's do some research.
Mostly smaller euro-players but yeah. F-35 is a step up over the eurocanards in every way except flight performance.

Flight performance? Care to elaborate more? Are you talking about clean configuration or combat load because the Swiss report talks about F-35's "flight performance" over the 4th gen fighters in combat load and take a guess what they said?
 
F-35 that can "supercruise" at mach 1.2 over 150+ miles.
Source. Is this one of the faux supercruise like with the gripen's? F35 lack of supercruise-ability is known.
Stealth has been properly tested in 1991 over Baghdad where they had the second most dense IADS in the world after Moscow. B2s and F-117s also tested against IADS and of of the tens thousands of sorties B2 and F-117 combined have flown only one was shot down due to USAF incompetence. Stealth has existed since the 70's do some research.
Wasn't the success in Baghdad more due to the SEAD/DEAD operations done by the f-16's and f-18's rather than the f-117's?
Kosovo shotdown of the f117 did bring stealth in question even though it was a lucky fluke. Modern stealth is still different to 90's stealth. Iraqi IADS was still outdated and monkey model tier like all of Iraqi military.
Flight performance? Care to elaborate more? Are you talking about clean configuration or combat load because the Swiss report talks about F-35's "flight performance" over the 4th gen fighters in combat load and take a guess what they said?
Enlighten me
Even if India scrapped the s400 they'd still be a lot of hurdles for any sale of F-35's to India.
It's specifically the s400 and caatsa. Care to elaborate on the rest of the hurdles. Atleast two squadrons of the f-35B's could be bought if not for the s400
 
The shootdown of the F-117 is hilarious. You get so overconfident in your stealth you toss out every operating procedure ever.

That plane repeated the same route for weeks and weeks with the SAM sights trying every which way to lock on. Then in a stroke of luck a really old SAM system got a lucky lock when the F-117 was opening it's bomb doors significantly degrading its RCS.

Now, of course the F-117 was 25 year old technology at that point, but meh.

On the topic of performance it's obvious the F-35 doesn't lack at all, an is in fact superior in many ways according to Swiss. Welcome to the concept of drag when you have a bunch of external stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Innominate
Source. Is this one of the faux supercruise like with the gripen's? F35 lack of supercruise-ability is known.

Wasn't the success in Baghdad more due to the SEAD/DEAD operations done by the f-16's and f-18's rather than the f-117's?
Kosovo shotdown of the f117 did bring stealth in question even though it was a lucky fluke. Modern stealth is still different to 90's stealth. Iraqi IADS was still outdated and monkey model tier like all of Iraqi military.

Enlighten me

It's specifically the s400 and caatsa. Care to elaborate on the rest of the hurdles. Atleast two squadrons of the f-35B's could be bought if not for the s400
The first mission of the F-117 before the F-16's and F-18 sead/dead missions was a direct strike on Baghdad. Unescorted and completely alone. Their main goal was to knock out the comms tower.

USA's main generals figured success based on CNN reporting going down lmao.


 
You are preparing yourself for a disappointment... like I said earlier.

Now WHAT IF the budget is so small, that only Superbug and Gripen are able to fit into it.

Then there will be no Rafale vs F-35 matchup. What is the only matchup possible?

It is Superbug vs. Gripen.

But WHAT IF Gripen is the only plane that can meet the miminum number of aircraft inside the budget? Then there is no matchup.

And in theory, there is even the chance that NONE of the planes meet the requirements. Then everyone goes home. But this is very mutch a hypothetical, theoretical-only possibility.

Why is it so hard to believe that there is a certain set of requirements, and if the seller does not meet them, it is out?

Now again, I don't have any inside info. So MAYBE the only plane that meets requirements is Rafale. Just maybe.

Last time, with DX, F-16 was out of the game. To the Russians, they said "we are looking for a single engine plane" and then Mig-29 was out. The funny thing is that Hornet has two engines, so maybe the Russians were a bit pissed off in the end. Mirage 2000 and Hornet were the only two contestants that met the requirements.


The only thing worse then an overbudget military program is an overbudget and crap product military product.

I dunno, my confidence stems from the F-35 track record. Outside of USA not selling or clearpoltiking(Germany), I haven't seen it lose, ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Innominate
Source. Is this one of the faux supercruise like with the gripen's? F35 lack of supercruise-ability is known.

The F-35, while not technically a "supercruising" aircraft, can maintain Mach 1.2 for a dash of 150 miles without using fuel-gulping afterburners.

"Mach 1.2 is a good speed for you, according to the pilots," O’Bryan said.

The high speed also allows the F-35 to impart more energy to a weapon such as a bomb or missile, meaning the aircraft will be able to "throw" such munitions farther than they could go on their own energy alone.

There is a major extension of the fighter’s range if speed is kept around Mach .9, O’Bryan went on, but he asserted that F-35 transonic performance is exceptional and goes "through the [Mach 1] number fairly easily." The transonic area is "where you really operate."

In combat configuration, the F-35’s range exceeds that of fourth generation fighters by 25 percent. These are Air Force figures, O’Bryan noted. "We’re comparing [the F-35] to [the] ‘best of’ fourth gen" fighters. The F-35 "compares favorably in any area of the envelope," he asserted.

Wasn't the success in Baghdad more due to the SEAD/DEAD operations done by the f-16's and f-18's rather than the f-117's?

Ever hear of Package Q Strike? Almost 80 aircraft with 56 F-16's went into Baghdad and pretty much failed because of Baghdad's IADS.
Kosovo shotdown of the f117 did bring stealth in question even though it was a lucky fluke. Modern stealth is still different to 90's stealth. Iraqi IADS was still outdated and monkey model tier like all of Iraqi military.

1991 Baghdad's IADS were not monkey models they were installed by French and Swedish companies.

“The first night of the war, we wanted to seize control of the air first and foremost, and we also wanted to introduce shock into their entire system. … That’s why we hit the communications buildings, the sector operation centers, the radars in the airfields,” said Horner.

Disabling Iraq’s highly modern integrated air defense system was step one. Planners met with executives from the French and Swedish companies that had installed the system. The idea was to saturate and attack it in the right places to overwhelm it. “We knew so much about the Iraqi air defense system, we could have built it ourselves,” USAF Brig. Gen. Buster C. Glosson, who commanded fighter forces, later wrote.
Enlighten me

You first. Tell me about how the Eurocanards flight performance is a step over the F-35?
 
You first. Tell me about how the Eurocanards flight performance is a step over the F-35?
Eurocanards have superior thrust to wt. ratio compared to the f-35.
Eurocanards except the gripen can supercruise at mach 1.4-1.5 compared to the f-35 at mach 1.2
Can pull higher G's without experiencing damaging stress to airframe and losing stealth.
Higher speed
Better agility because of the canards
 
The maneuverability of this.
images.jpeg



is very different than this.

Eurofighter_Typhoon_(ZJ937)_at_Turku_Airshow_2019_5.jpeg


Whenever I hear stats about the Rafale or Typhoon with regards to basically anything I know i'm getting the latter.

So yes, in real life the F-35 outperforms, while in airshows we can talk about canards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Innominate
Eurocanards have superior thrust to wt. ratio compared to the f-35.

Not with a combat load.
Eurocanards except the gripen can supercruise at mach 1.4-1.5 compared to the f-35 at mach 1.2

Yet supercruise is the last thing on nations defense officials mind when selecting a fighter, why is that? Why isn't supercruise a selling point by dassault or typhoon? How is supercruise on fighters that carry much less fuel than F-35 going to give it an advantage over more advanced fighters?
Can pull higher G's without experiencing damaging stress to airframe and losing stealth.

F-35A is limited to 9gs and how does it lose its stealth pulling 9gs? When has that ever happened?
Higher speed

In combat load not so much and mach 2+ speed is not important anymore or high speeds in general.
@4:30 hear this fighter pilot tell you about how important speed is.

Better agility because of the canards

How is that important in a world of JHMCS and HOB missiles like the Aim-9xII and Aim-120D? Does the french plane even have JHMCS?
 

Attachments

  • main-qimg-20d50c98866ed5c3516da6cd986e6756.png
    main-qimg-20d50c98866ed5c3516da6cd986e6756.png
    135.4 KB · Views: 145
How is that important in a world of JHMCS and HOB missiles like the Aim-9xII and Aim-120D? Does the french plane even have JHMCS?
It doesn't but the indian rafales use the targo II so it can use the asraam which is superior to the aim 9x.
 
The maneuverability of this.
View attachment 21596

Funnily enough, this is not expected to be agile in the first place, even on the F-35.

Only the A2A version counts, particularly when carrying only 2 WVR missiles, 'cause that's when agility comes into the picture. Meaning, you have expended all your weapons save for the WVR missiles and are now preparing to enter WVR combat, hence the importance of agility in this regime.

The F-35 needs to carry its WVR missiles on the wings too, thereby giving up on stealth. But, since it's not really been designed for WVR combat, it doesn't require agility or WVR weapons. It definitely beats the F-16 and F/A-18's agility in some areas, but that's not impressive. You gotta be the best in the nation, not in your high school, if you want to compete in the Olympics. The only thing impressive about the F-35 is its decent subsonic acceleration at low to medium altitude, the regime where it's been specifically designed to operate in.

Give it a few years, once it becomes operational it's gonna enter exercises and air forces are going to dog fight with it, especially the Rafale and Typhoon boys. The results will become evident then, and you can expect LM and all the F-35 fanboys talk about how the F-35 will kill you before a dog fight happens anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Of course, I won't care. As long as the F-35 and Rafale get shortlisted in the Finnish competition, the conclusion derived will end the debate for me.
 
How is that important in a world of JHMCS and HOB missiles like the Aim-9xII and Aim-120D? Does the french plane even have JHMCS?
You do have a point there, but the matter is not completely black-and-white. If a plane is agile, it is better able to evade all kinds of missiles, both ground-launched and air-launched.

There are some very different design philosophies and operating philosophies behind these aircraft. In (theoretical) Finnish use, they would all be used in a different manner. They don't fit inside a single "mold". I say theoretical, because of course only one will end up in actual use in Finland.
 
OK then folks, here we have a very very interesting new article. By the way, we can expect more of these articles as the HX decision is approaching.


My comments: headline says it all. There are some things that can not be discussed in public! They say that the decision is NOT political, BUT: of course we can guess that this is strictly speaking not 100% true. How much are politics involved? Well, political guidance has been there all along, affecting the planning of HX. Also the very final choice will be made by politicians.

We come back to this very fine example of double-talk that I mentioned earlier: last time around, the Finns told Russia that they wanted a plane with ONE engine, hence Mig-29 was out. Afterwards, Hornet entered the scene, and as it is a plane with two engines, it wasn't hard for Russians to figure out that Finns were actually thinking of something else, ie. a choice to not fly Russian.

Pär Stenbäck is a Swedish Finn. You can probably guess that the Swedish-speakers would like to align with Sweden. But this is a complicated matter - the "True Finns" are anti-Swedish, and Swedish-speaking Finns are a minority. I would say that the "True Finns" mostly want co-operation with USA. I am not a "True Finn" myself.

Pär Stenbäck lists the spectrum of options politically. These are Finland-Sweden, two different "European" choices, and then American co-operation.

Stenbäck also mentions one risk with the American choice: it is the possible comeback of Donald Trump. This is a minus for the two American choices, and probably a plus for Rafale.

Listen up gang, this is all very very, VERY interesting. I hope somebody else here finds it equally interesting. Not a long time to wait any more...!
 
Wasn't the success in Baghdad more due to the SEAD/DEAD operations done by the f-16's and f-18's rather than the f-117's?
Initial strike came from Apaches helicopters. They destroyed first line of air defence by destroying radar stations, surveillance with hydra rockets fired from Apaches. The loop hole created by that attack onn surveillance capabilities later exploited by other aircraft's.

In gulf war 1
 
It doesn't but the indian rafales use the targo II so it can use the asraam which is superior to the aim 9x.
i wouldn't call it superior than the 9xII. Aim-9xII has pretty much the same capabilities as the asraam. The 9xII is a BVR-ish, LOAL, 90-degree off-boresight and thrust vectoring missile. Asraam is also on F-35's.
 
Funnily enough, this is not expected to be agile in the first place, even on the F-35.

Only the A2A version counts, particularly when carrying only 2 WVR missiles, 'cause that's when agility comes into the picture. Meaning, you have expended all your weapons save for the WVR missiles and are now preparing to enter WVR combat, hence the importance of agility in this regime.

Like the F-22/F-35 pilot said, SA is life or death and more important than speed or agility. The world of 9x and JHMCS have made agility dead.

Fighter pilots that see their friends getting shot down by fighters they can't see or detect are not going to stick around they are going to bug-out.


The F-35 needs to carry its WVR missiles on the wings too, thereby giving up on stealth.

It doesn't give up its stealth the RCS on 9x missiles are negligible. If the F-35 was able to hide a flight of F-16's from 8 Red F-16s without giving away its EM signature I'm pretty sure it can do the same for two external 9x. Enemy fighters are not going to know what hit if anything th first sign they are about to die will be severe EW being done on them.
But, since it's not really been designed for WVR combat, it doesn't require agility or WVR weapons. It definitely beats the F-16 and F/A-18's agility in some areas, but that's not impressive.

Lol. What? F-35A has one of the best AOA and is between an F-16 and F-18 and you're not impressed? WVR are not dog fight ranges dog fighting is pretty much getting close for a gun kill WVR can be up to 5-10 miles where agility is pointless to a 50+g aim-9xII or an Aim-120 that also has HOB capabilities.
Give it a few years, once it becomes operational it's gonna enter exercises and air forces are going to dog fight with it, especially the Rafale and Typhoon boys. The results will become evident then, and you can expect LM and all the F-35 fanboys talk about how the F-35 will kill you before a dog fight happens anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Ah yes dog fighting in combat exercise is the real litmus test of a fighters worth, right? You know how many gun kills Israel had in 1982 Bekaa Valley air war..? Two! And one was on a helicopter. F-22s and F-15s get shot down all the time by T-38s and F-5s at Red Flag I guess T-38s and F5s are better fighters?