For the radar : conform lateral antenna and new T/R technology
for the transmission : new satellit datalink and intra patrol discreet link
ISF with a new IR head.
etc....
For the radar : conform lateral antenna and new T/R technology
Why the hell SC want to look anywhere when all the document says it.Wrong, since you can't clear anything, if you don't look into it and SC admittedly didn't looked into Hollands statements.
IAF officers came to court and said. GoI did this multiple times in the past as explained by DM in the parliament. (Mig-29 for example)Who said SC should decide on numbers? The question was why they were cut down and neither the government in their documents, nor IAF gave an explanation for it.
If you don't have faith in our institutions then there is no point arguing. Also, criticizing them sitting outside is a bit rich. You see we don't have that luxury.Or you simply can't admit to the flaws in the judgement, let alone the revelations the whole SC joke brought with it? No guarantees, confirmed deveations in the procedure, judgement based on wrong informations provided by the government, copy and paste by the SC of the contents from the government documents...
Denial of facts, doesn't make the facts go away and not looking into an issue, doesn't mean there isn't one.
Well, instead of being laconic, refute it with facts for the benefit of everyone around. You don't want Sancho to come in & start a kerfuffle now, do you?People can be dumbasses.
The news had emerged in Defence news and this news was highly distorted to give it a twist. The actual news was that French govt had given Euro2B for development of F4 standard R&D and had ordered a further 28 Rafale from the privious order of 170 aircraft.Well, instead of being laconic, refute it with facts for the benefit of everyone around. You don't want Sancho to come in & start a kerfuffle now, do you?
Instead of asking others for explanation read it for once.Well, instead of being laconic, refute it with facts for the benefit of everyone around. You don't want Sancho to come in & start a kerfuffle now, do you?
Did I ask you?Instead of asking others for explanation read it for one.
If someone is so dumb to miss the BS. Explanation won't help.
Well, instead of being laconic, refute it with facts for the benefit of everyone around. You don't want Sancho to come in & start a kerfuffle now, do you?
I'm waiting for @Sancho 's response.It's in the article:
"France did not announce yesterday any new aircraft acquisition order! The amount you’re referring to will finance solely the development of the new F4 standard for the Rafale. The 28 aircraft remaining to be delivered to the French Air Force are part of previous acquisition contracts," the envoy tweeted.
I'm waiting for @Sancho 's response.
Not exactly. The actual news was the two billions for funding the development of the F4 standard, and a reminder that 28 aircraft are still to be delivered out of the firm order of 180, since 152 have been delivered so far.The news had emerged in Defence news and this news was highly distorted to give it a twist. The actual news was that French govt had given Euro2B for development of F4 standard R&D and had ordered a further 28 Rafale from the privious order of 170 aircraft.
The 2 billions € (in fact 1.9) ARE ONLY FOR THE F4 DEVELOPPMENT.
this article is contradactory in itself. They know weapon inflation of 9.5% but did not present it in final calculation of total price for 36 in 2011 vs 2016.