Absolutely. What's the point of aquiring new MKIs of vintage standard? If we decide to procure more, then the future MKIs should have even higher-spec than what is touted for first match of MLU. So we need to have frame mounted DCMAWS that also should function as EODAS along with maybe even DIRCM turrets. The change in aircraft skin from Al to CFC/CNT should also take place. I am also hoping for some sort of radar-blockers(front/back) plus External Weapons Pod mounted between the engines to house 4-6 Astras internally.
Agree with your other points. DIRCM though is too ambitious considering not even RuAF Su-30SM/35S have them. I'd hoped the Russians would backfit the dorsal/spine DIRCRM system from Su-57 on to Su-30/35 family jets but that doesn't appear to be happening, maybe because of weight or power concerns. Aside from I-D-R-W, nobody else is reporting about DC-MAWS going onboard MKI UPG.So we need to have frame mounted DCMAWS that also should function as EODAS along with maybe even DIRCM turrets
Absolutely. What's the point of aquiring new MKIs of vintage standard? If we decide to procure more, then the future MKIs should have even higher-spec than what is touted for first match of MLU. So we need to have frame mounted DCMAWS that also should function as EODAS along with maybe even DIRCM turrets. The change in aircraft skin from Al to CFC/CNT should also take place. I am also hoping for some sort of radar-blockers(front/back) plus External Weapons Pod mounted between the engines to house 4-6 Astras internally.
All the aforememtioned changes will keep MKI up to date for future threats. MKI's size allows it to house a mammoth GaN AESA radar which can guide something like Astra 3(almost a VLRAAM) to its max range. It's going to be vital for us to take out enemy HVAs from long.
Absolutely. What's the point of aquiring new MKIs of vintage standard? If we decide to procure more, then the future MKIs should have even higher-spec than what is touted for first match of MLU. So we need to have frame mounted DCMAWS that also should function as EODAS along with maybe even DIRCM turrets. The change in aircraft skin from Al to CFC/CNT should also take place. I am also hoping for some sort of radar-blockers(front/back) plus External Weapons Pod mounted between the engines to house 4-6 Astras internally.
All the aforememtioned changes will keep MKI up to date for future threats. MKI's size allows it to house a mammoth GaN AESA radar which can guide something like Astra 3(almost a VLRAAM) to its max range. It's going to be vital for us to take out enemy HVAs from long.
How're you going to get that when the tech going in on the MKIs will in itself take 8 yrs to be validated ? Post that 8 more years for MLU of 80 odd MKIs.Absolutely. What's the point of aquiring new MKIs of vintage standard? If we decide to procure more, then the future MKIs should have even higher-spec than what is touted for first match of MLU.
Are these part of the MLU ? If not we can keep upgrading the MKI to eternity thru another MLU once the present one is over in a mere 16 years time that too for the first set of 80 MKIs. Btw we don't even know the final nos of MKI which'd be thus upgraded.So we need to have frame mounted DCMAWS that also should function as EODAS along with maybe even DIRCM turrets. The change in aircraft skin from Al to CFC/CNT should also take place. I am also hoping for some sort of radar-blockers(front/back) plus External Weapons Pod mounted between the engines to house 4-6 Astras internally.
All the aforememtioned changes will keep MKI up to date for future threats. MKI's size allows it to house a mammoth GaN AESA radar which can guide something like Astra 3(almost a VLRAAM) to its max range. It's going to be vital for us to take out enemy HVAs from long.
Since we're going with the same engines, we need to wait for more details regarding UPG. induction timings. 8 + 8 =16 years look like too long, IMO.How're you going to get that when the tech going in on the MKIs will in itself take 8 yrs to be validated ? Post that 8 more years for MLU of 80 odd MKIs.
Yes, new airframes made with spec of UPG. Batch 2. With every batch, we'll have something new and better.Are these part of the MLU ? If not we can keep upgrading the MKI to eternity thru another MLU once the present one is over in a mere 16 years time that too for the first set of 80 MKIs. Btw we don't even know the final nos of MKI which'd be thus upgraded.
I agree . If they wanted to place an enhanced order what better time to do it than now . I don't think we'd be mfg MKI in the 2030s .The upgrade part is probably not related with new su30 orders wrt IAF preferring squadron wise upgrades, not new upgraded airframes. So the existing squadron jets can get upgrades in tranche like planned. Have to balance with engine roh also to compensate with operational nos. The 12 new ones are replacement of shortfall in existing sqn and any further order imo is a distant prospect. Look at how long it took to clear these 12 nos.
F-22 is getting upgrade of its AN/AAR-56 PMAWS sensor with EODAS like IRST based system. MKI UPG. will also need something like that, so that it'll have 360° spherical coverage, allowing it to engage targets who are trying to sneak it from behind/below.
DC-MAWS needs to be upgraded for that along with being airframe mounted for that to happen.
Maybe crazy for you but not for us. We're actively working for our MAWS to also work like all-aspect IRST sensor developing weapons grade track covering spherical 360° aspect of the aircraft. So our EODAS in short.View attachment 39844
The Su-35 has some of the features you mentioned, but the idea of installing EODAS on the Su-30 is too crazy, so watch to see when the SU30MKI gets a basie MAWS.
the PLA installed it in the early SU27 upgrade
View attachment 39846
AFAIK, FCS upgrade was always going to be done by Sukhoi guys. But yes, I also would have prefred to go the desi route, but we chose the easy way to maybe placate the Ruskies.Seen reports earlier that we're approaching Russia for development of new FCL for the Super Sukhoi upgrades . Was under the impression we already outsourced this work to a local company out here . You know anything about this ? @Rajput Lion
But then what about the report you linked here a few years ago about a Bangalore based party contracted to develop the FCL ?AFAIK, FCS upgrade was always going to be done by Sukhoi guys. But yes, I also would have prefred to go the desi route, but we chose the easy way to maybe placate the Ruskies.
Maybe a parallel project or we might have decided to not mess too much with FCS of MKI, thus resorting to OEM's upgrade path.But then what about the report you linked here a few years ago about a Bangalore based party contracted to develop the FCL ?
From my observation of HAL, the more advance the PPT is, the less likely it is to be achieved. India would be better off buying the Dutch missile pylons to upgrade its combat capability cheaply and quicklyMaybe crazy for you but not for us. We're actively working for our MAWS to also work like all-aspect IRST sensor developing weapons grade track covering spherical 360° aspect of the aircraft. So our EODAS in short.
The upgrade program started last year. What kind of things are you following?The SU-30 upgrade programme has been going on for almost 10 years and not a single Su-30 has been upgraded yet. India would be better off with a simple but effective upgrade programme.
View attachment 39844
The Su-35 has some of the features you mentioned, but the idea of installing EODAS on the Su-30 is too crazy, so watch to see when the SU30MKI gets a basie MAWS.
the PLA installed it in the early SU27 upgrade
View attachment 39846