Syrian Civil War - News & Discussions


Alliances shift as Syrian Kurdish alliance holds talks with Assad regime


bachar_el_assad_ok.jpg
© Sana/AFP | Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during a press interview on June 10, 2018.
Text by FRANCE 24


Latest update : 2018-07-27

A US-backed Kurdish alliance is holding talks in Damascus with Syrian government representatives with an eye on Turkish ambitions in Syria.

The ancient adage, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” is once again being put into action on the ground in Syria, where a seven-year civil war has seen regional and global powers forced into sometimes unlikely agreements and accommodations.

This week, representatives of the US-backed, Kurdish-led SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) traveled from northern and northeastern Syria to the capital, Damascus, for the first time, for talks with officials from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

The SDF, an alliance of predominantly Kurdish fighters, as well as Arab militias, was formed in 2015 to defend Syria’s northeastern region from jihadist groups such as the Islamic State (IS) group and al Qaeda-affiliated militias.

Following hard-fought military campaigns in and around northern Syrian towns such as Kobane and Manbij, Syria’s Kurds were determined not to lose their gains to hardline Salafist groups such as the IS group. Their goals coincided with those of the US, France, Britain and other nations affected by the IS group threat.

But changing times require changing alliances – especially for the Kurds, the world’s largest ethnic group without a homeland. Spread across the border regions of Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran, the Kurds have historically been played by global powers, wooed when their fighting skills are needed only to be abandoned at payback time.

While SDF fighters captured the IS group’s de facto capital of Raqqa in October 2017 with support from the US-led coalition, Washington has since been inconsistent about its support for Syria’s Kurds.

Meanwhile a military intervention in Syria by Turkey -- which views the Kurdish gains across its southern border with deep unease -- led to the capture by Turkish forces of the Kurdish enclave of Afrin in northwestern Syria. Turkey, a NATO ally, has threatened to wrest Manbij -- a town around 25 kilometres east of Afrin -- from SDF control, and there has been periodic fighting between a militia linked to the SDF and Turkish-backed Syrian rebels.

The Turkish advances, along with conflicting US statements over its military plans in Syria, has left the Kurds within the SDF – which controls about 27 percent of Syrian territory -- extremely wary about their future in the autonomous areas.

"The Kurds today have an autonomous administration that they will probably not be able to maintain, but they can find some advantages to a compromise with the [Syrian] regime: the return of public services and state administrations that they never have had the means to finance," explained Thomas Pierret of CNRS (Centre National de la recherche scientifique) in an interview with FRANCE 24.

Cooperation on the ground

In the lead-up to the latest talks, Kurdish-led forces have been reaching agreements on the ground with Syrian army units, according to local media reports.

Last year, Kurdish forces surrendered a few villages between Manbij and al-Bab further west to Syrian army units to enable the SDF to concentrate on the battle for Raqqa. "The Raqqa battle was disturbed many times because of the Turkish-backed attacks on our areas, so we handed those areas [to a Syrian army unit] to carry on the offensive against Daesh [IS group],” a Syrian Kurdish official told Kurdistan 24.

The cooperation on the ground has been increasing in recent months. Earlier this month, an SDF official told the local Hawar news agency that there were talks between the local council of SDF-controlled Tabqa and local Syrian government officials to improve services and to restore the regime’s powers over the Tabqa dam, Syria’s largest dam.

Getting US troops out of Syria

At the start of the Syrian uprising in 2011, Assad attempted to woo Syria’s Kurds, a long marginalised group, against what he primarily viewed as a Sunni rebellion against his regime. With Turkey supporting the Syrian opposition, Assad initially attempted to win Kurdish loyalty by issuing a presidential decree granting Syrian citizenship to tens of thousands of them – something the Kurds had been seeking for more than half a century.

But while Assad was content to ignore the fighting in the Kurdish areas, concentrating instead on more strategic battles such as Aleppo, the recent gains by the SDF have been viewed with suspicion in Damascus. Backed by Russia and Iran, the Syrian leader today has succeeded in regaining control of huge swathes of the country and Assad can now concentrate on ensuring that the autonomous zones do not break away from Syria.

Assad views both US special forces and Turkish troops in the area as “occupying forces” and is eager to see them out of Syria.

There are currently around 2,000 US troops stationed in the Manbij area, and according to Aron Lund from the New York-based Century Foundation, "The priority for the Syrian regime is to get rid of US troops on its soil,” he noted in an interview with FRANCE 24, adding that, “Negotiations could speed up their departure."

A Kurdish lawmaker who sits in the national parliament in Damascus told the AFP Friday that the talks would focus on confining SDF ambitions to the cultural sphere with central government control restored in areas under its control.

Syria’s Kurds, like their counterparts in Turkey, have maintained that they do not seek independence from either Damascus or Ankara, but are demanding autonomy to control local administrative services and protect their cultural identity, including teaching the Kurdish language in schools.

The Kurds have been consistently left out of UN-led diplomatic talks in line with the wishes of NATO member Turkey, which views Syria's dominant Kurdish groups as an extension of the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

Security issues to be ironed out

But the return of Syrian state control would still be a tough pill for the SDF to swallow. The Kurdish areas these days are being run by primarily leftist local councils that have equal representation of women. Kurdish flags, along with photographs of Abdullah Ocalan -- the Kurdish leader imprisoned on a Turkish island -- adorn public buildings and the sense of a Kurdish renaissance of sorts prevails across the autonomous zones.

There are also major security issues to be ironed out between the two sides, according to Pierret. "One of the important questions that will arise is the future of SDF combatants. Will these militiamen form a local police, in theory subordinate to Damascus, or will they go back to reintegrate the Syrian army? Many questions remain unresolved,” he noted.

Some initiatives have already been launched in recent months, including better cooperation in Qamishli, a border city once dubbed, “the secret capital of Syria’s Kurds”. Kurdish flags and posters of Ocalan have been removed from Qamishli streets in recent days and the Tabqa dam has been restarted by mutual agreement between the SDS and Damascus.

Any future compromise will depend on the flexibility of the Syrian regime as well as Assad’s international backers. "Russia would not be against a federal solution, while Iran is hostile to any form of autonomy for the Kurds," explained Pierret.

Turkey’s position will also be critical to any future solution. There are currently around 1,300 Turkish soldiers around Idlib and Turkey supports several thousand rebel militia fighters allied to various groups.

Any coordination between the SDF and the Assad regime on the ground would be a red line for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

But that is precisely what Assad would like to see. The Kurds have never been a priority for the Assads since the family seized control of Syria in 1970. But if the current Syrian leader manages to woo the Kurds on his side against his arch foe, Erdogan, it would mark a suitable alliance with an enemy of his enemy.

Link: Alliances shift as Syrian Kurdish alliance holds talks with Assad regime - France 24


Looks like SDF and Syarian government is going to forge an alliance in return for autonomy. Smart choice I would say, Kurds know that US is there for temporary political objectives and in long term, it is better to have close relation with Damascus government.

It's difficult to see how it will pan out. Both Iran and Turkey will not want the Kurds to have autonomy. The US and Russia will not want to leave either.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Volcano
SAA liberated entire Israel-Syria border.

2.png
1.PNG


Many former members of Syrian Rebel alliance reconciled with the Syrian Government and participating in the ongoing operation against ISIS in the southern Syria.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randomradio
Huge victory for Syrian Government.

SAA cleared all of southern Syria From terrorists. Operation in south completed successfully.

1533096922003.png


Last remaining 100 ISIS members surrendered. According to some reports, about 25 of the 100 surrendered ISIS members were executed by locals and ex-members of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) that were particiapting in the Syrian Army operation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Volcano
Three Large Turkish-backed Armed Groups In Northern Syria Merged Into New Faction



Hassan Sufan, leader of the SLF

UPDATE: In the evening of August 1, the Turkish-backed National Front for Liberation (NFL), the Syrian Liberation Front (SLF) and the Suqour al-Sham Brigades as well as small groups – Jaysh al-Ahrar and Damascus Gathering – merged into a new faction.

The new group will use the name of the National Front for Liberation but this is a de-facto new faction.

***

The Turkish-backed National Front for Liberation (NFL), the Syrian Liberation Front (SLF) and the Suqour al-Sham Brigades are planning to merge their forces in order to form a new armed group in the northern governorate of Idlib, the Syrian news outlet Enab Baladi reported on August 1.

According to the pro-opposition news outlet, officials of the three groups are now in talks to organize the unification process. Turkey is reportedly pressuring the three groups to unify away from the former branch of al-Qaeda, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

A week earlier, Syrian opposition sources said that most of the armed groups in Idlib have a new operations room to fend off any possible attack of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) and its allies on the governorate. However, HTS was among the key founders of the operations room, opposite to Turkey’s will.

Turkish activists said that the NFL, the SLF and the Suqour al-Sham Brigades will announce their merge soon. In this case, HTS will likely view the new group as threat to its influence in northern Syria and work to eliminate it.
 
@Atalay What is the Turkey's position on the Idlib front? Syrian government promised to start an operation in Idlib within few months. There are some 100,000 militants in Idlib backed up by Turkey and 2.5 million civilians, out of which 1.2 million are internally displaced civilians who are very anti-Assad. What exactly is turkey's options here? If Syria lanch military operation in Idlib, it seems they won't be able to hold their positions by their own. Will Turkey enter direct confrontation with SAA?
 
Syria's Kurds prepare for a future without the US

With Bashar Al Assad on edge of victory nation's Kurds have begun tentative negotiations with regime

Syria-Trump-IS.jpg
In this April 4, 2018 file photo, a US soldier sits on his armoured vehicle on a road leading to the tense front line with Turkish-backed fighters, in Manbij, northern Syria. AP Photo
For the past seven years, Syria's Kurds have maintained an uneasy truce with President Bashar Al Assad’s government. The differences between them have been overshadowed by greater threats.


But today, with ISIS all but defeated and the Syrian army in control of most of the country, those differences cannot be put aside any longer.


The two sides are tentatively beginning to address seemingly incompatible positions: Mr Al Assad's aim to recapture “every inch” of Syria, and a long-held Kurdish desire for decentralised government.


"The Syrian panorama is more clear now," Zozan Alloush, a senior member of the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), told The National. "They recognise our power on the ground. Our people have sacrificed enough and we think now is the time to negotiate."


Late last month, representatives of the US-backed SDC – whose military wing, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), controls 30 per cent of the country, travelled to Damascus to meet the government for the first time.


The meeting lasted an hour and a half and mostly covered the restoration of public services. But SDC officials said the government also agreed to "chart a roadmap to a democratic and decentralised Syria".


There has also been movement on the ground. In June, the local administration in the SDF-controlled city of Tabqa agreed to jointly run the city's dam on the Euphrates River with Damascus.


And last week, Syrian government officials took their first steps in Raqqa since 2013, at the invitation of the SDF, to collect the bodies of Syrian soldiers killed by ISIS.


The rapprochement represents a recognition by the government that the status quo formed during the civil war will continue, at least for now. But the question remains whether Mr Al Assad, who has repeatedly dismissed the idea of conceding any control, is serious about change.





"From a strategic perspective, a deal that gives the SDF areas of self administration in exchange for Damascus getting access to resources such as water, wheat, and oil makes sense," said Nicholas Heras, Middle East Security Fellow at the Centre for a New American Security.


"But the view from Damascus is that decentralisation is a tactic to buy time for the regime to gather its strength and to put it in a position, eventually, to reassert full control over all areas of Syria."


In the chaos of the civil war, the Kurdish-dominated SDF emerged as the dominant power in the northeast and east of the country. The Syrian government was facing an uprising that threatened its very survival, and so it largely left the Kurdish majority areas to their own devices.


When the Kurds faced their own threat, in the form of an onslaught by ISIS, they gained a powerful friend in the US, which provided massive military support and a degree of political backing. This protection provided the Kurds cover to pursue a long-held dream of autonomy.


They declared the establishment of an autonomous federal system, which they hoped would outlive the war. They moved beyond a purely Kurdish nationalist project, setting up civil councils in majority Arab cities such Raqqa and Deir Ezzour, made up of tribal leaders – although many in majority Arab areas resent the dominant role of the Kurdish YPG in the SDF.


___________


Read more:


Divided and marginalised — how Syria's war split occupied Golan Heights


Syrian regime forces close in on area near Israeli-annexed Golan Heights


___________


But the last year has demonstrated that those gains are not guaranteed. Turkey invaded the SDF-held Afrin region in January, ostensibly to push out the People's Protection Units (YPG), a Syrian Kurdish militia which makes up the largest contingent of the SDF and which Ankara views as a terrorist organisation.


That the US could do little to stop the offensive, and that it had the tacit approval of Russia, also served as a reminder that the survival of the SDF project could not rely on outside help.


The election of Donald Trump gave the SDF more reason to be pragmatic. The US president has repeatedly spoken of his desire to withdraw roughly 2,000 American troops from the country. The uncertainty over exactly how long the US will remain in Syria was a major motivation for the Kurds' negotiations with the government.


"The SDF wants the Americans to stay as long as possible, which would allow them to strengthen its position even further and get an even better deal from Assad," said Mr Heras. "The best Assad's government can do for the time being is talk to the SDF, offer it incentives to work more with the regime, and bide its time for when America decides it is done with the Syrian adventure."


The US has officially stayed silent on the talks, but behind the scenes there have been efforts to encourage the SDF to open the door to the Syrian government again.


Col Sean Ryan, a spokesman for the US-led coalition, told The National that “there is still a lot of work and fighting to be done. However, a political solution will eventually have to be made and we understand the SDF’s right to negotiate as they are Syrians.”


He added that “discussions are still in the preliminary stage and too early for any decisions to be made”.


By agreeing to a deal while the US still has forces in Syria, the SDF hopes to strengthen the position on the ground: the longer the civil councils and decentralised system they created operate, the harder it will be to remove them.


SDF officials have been told by the coalition that they are in Syria for the long-term, but they are preparing for their exit nonetheless.


“We are not saying that if they go they are betraying us. We understand that they have their own interests. Nobody can stay in a land that is not theirs forever,” said Ms Alloush.


As far as the SDF is concerned, the negotiations with the government are a first step, and have no guarantee of success. But they are adamant that a return to direct government rule is out of the question.


“We are not the same people we were after all these years of revolution. No one can eliminate us," said Ms Alloush.


“Syria is divided, and the only way to make it a country again is to decentralise. These areas are out of the control of the regime. We are also out of the control of the regime,” she said.
 
Syrian Kurds say Afrin liberation main topic in any negotiations

Wladimir van Wilgenburg |


YPGAfrinEsmMain.jpg

A Kurdish YPG fighter patrols near a Turkish tank in Esme village in Syria's Aleppo province in 2015. (Photo: Associated Press/Mursel Coban)


KOBANI (Kurdistan 24) – Polat Can, a senior commander of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), said on Sunday that the liberation of Afrin is one of the main topics for any negotiations with other parts of the country.

“As SDF, YPG, YPJ forces, we keep in mind, and our top priority is the process of the liberation of Afrin. Afrin is first, and Afrin is above any other considerations,” the SDF commander wrote on his official Twitter account.

“The liberation of Afrin and the expulsion of the invaders and the return of its people to it [Afrin] will be at the top of our agenda and the main condition for all our meetings and understandings and our endeavors with any other party,” he added.

Talks were held two weeks ago between the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC) and Damascus. Kurdish officials say they are willing to help Damascus fight Islamist militants in Idlib if Afrin is also liberated from the same militants that are backed by Turkey in the former Kurdish-held region.

The former co-chair of the Democratic Union Party (PYD), Salih Muslim, told Kurdistan 24 they are ready to fight “wherever, there are terrorists.”

“Fighting in Idlib or Afrin is our duty and responsibility, and when we fight in Idlib, it will be our decision as we are not tools in the hands of others,” he said.

According to Nicholas A. Heras, a Middle East security analyst at the Washington-based Center for a New American Security, the Syrian Kurds could only do this with Russian support.

“The YPG needs to weigh carefully whether it gains from participating in a war against Idlib. So long as the Trump administration has no quarrel with the idea, the YPG could gain support from Russia to find a workable arrangement to bring Afrin back to the YPG,” he said.

But YPG top commander Sipan Hemo told Asharq al-Awsat on Sunday that the Syrian government is not serious about launching an operation in Idlib.

“We have no proposals to make as long as the regime does not have a clear plan,” he said.

Hemo revealed the YPG’s military operations in Afrin continue and will grow in intensity with time.

Editing by Karzan Sulaivany
 
Change of plans: Syrian Army to target three major areas in northwest Syria





BEIRUT, LEBANON (1:00 A.M.) – A source from the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) told Al-Masdar News, tonight, that the military has no plans to attack the key town of Morek in northern Hama.

The source, who is currently at the front-lines in northern Hama, said that the Syrian Arab Army will instead focus on three major areas during their upcoming offensive:

  1. Northwest Hama: The Syrian Arab Army is going to clear the last areas before the key town of Qala’at Al-Madiq in the Al-Ghaab Plain.
  2. Southeast Idlib: The source said that the Syrian Army wants to clear the remaining towns around the Abu Dhuhour area.
  3. Northern Latakia: This does not come as a surprise because the northern axes of the Jabal Al-Akrad and Jabal Turkmen regions are all that remain under jihadist control in northern Latakia.
Once these areas are captured, the Syrian Arab Army will begin the second phase of their offensive, which is more heavily concentrated on the strategic city of Jisr Al-Shughour in southwest Idlib.

The source did stress that negotiations between the Turkish and Russian governments are still ongoing at this time; it is very likely that a deal will be reached to set parameters on the this upcoming offensive.

Change of plans: Syrian Army to target three major areas in northwest Syria
 
SAA is deploying large military forces around Idlib. An attack on Idlib, the last possible large scale battle of Syrian Civil war is imminent.
 
Possible attack axis on Idlib. I think 3 and 2 axis is more likely offensive points during the 1st Phase of operation.

Northern Latakia and Southern Idlib are mainly controlled by Al-nusra. So probably SAA will 1st go after al-nusra and then Turkish backed militants west of Aleppo through 1 axis. Otherwise a simultaneous attack will only unify the different Militants groups.

1535837069269.png
 
This battle might be a long one.
Yeah, I've only been giving it cursory attention over the last couple of years, but I was under the impression the SDF had reclaimed 90+% of the land. Obviously not. Russia have been there exactly 3 years now too, wonder if they'd planned on being there that long? This won't be doing their finances any good.