Does this include the replacement of the engine with the Desi alternative that was discussed few months back?
Here's 'RARE' snap of #IndianArmy mechanized formation, snap capture a small section of a larger formation belong to a 'STRIKE CORPS' simulating 'COLD START' #doctrine.
— 𝐊𝐔𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐁𝐈𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐒 (@Kunal_Biswas707) November 27, 2020
Total 23 x #BMP-2, 3 x T-72M1 #tanks, 2 X 9K35 Strela-10, 2 X CMTs,1 X Command & Control BMP in this snap. pic.twitter.com/flCYrLbvDJ
IA still stuck in 1980'sHere's 'RARE' snap of #IndianArmy mechanized formation, snap capture a small section of a larger formation belong to a 'STRIKE CORPS' simulating 'COLD START' #doctrine.
— 𝐊𝐔𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐁𝐈𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐒 (@Kunal_Biswas707) November 27, 2020
Total 23 x #BMP-2, 3 x T-72M1 #tanks, 2 X 9K35 Strela-10, 2 X CMTs,1 X Command & Control BMP in this snap. pic.twitter.com/flCYrLbvDJ
Upgraded T 72 with TIFCS, ERA MK 2 , new engine, ammo and gun will be superior to VT-4 . Indian T 72, upgrade look even better than russian T 72B3 minus ammo and gun which need an upgrade.View attachment 19713
T-72 TIFCS
These tank upgrade need 4S-24 type ERA on sides.Here`s clip of upgraded Indian T-72, featuring DRDO MK2 ERA equivalent of Kontakt-5 ERA though applied on hull unlike T-90
— 𝐊𝐔𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐁𝐈𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐒 (@Kunal_Biswas707) August 20, 2020
1000 hp uprated version of V46-6 engine which is reliable compare to T-90`s V92S2 engine@VinodDX9 @rathorekaran17 @I30mki @Maverick_bharat @Aryanwarlord pic.twitter.com/jK34st2bNk
The ERA which CIAs initially had on the sides have been dropped in this update for 3 side plates like that in T90.
no it isn't.our armoured capability is really becoming obsolete as compared to Pakistan.
LOL indigenous barrel is not superior to anything russian. Why don't you provide source for your claim.The indigenous barrel is superior to the Russian supplied barrel. I don't know by how much, but the EFC (number of shells a barrel can shoot before it becomes useless) is supposed to be many times higher. Even the indigenous T-72 barrel had 2.5 to 3 times the EFC as that of a Russian barrrel. We simply use more expensive materials and better autofrettaging techniques.
Existing T 90 gun autoloader can achieve 600mm+ penetration. Svinets 2 can achieve 600mm+ penetration from current gun without changing autoloader while with new autoloader it can hit 700mm easily. if army RFI to be believe you would need a DU round and new autoloader to achieve anything greater than 700mm penetration. but russian won't sell Svinets 1 so you have to develop it on your own.I highly doubt a APFSDS with a penetration capability of 600-800mm RHA at 2km would be made which is compatible with the existing 2A46M smoothbore gun and the existing autoloader system.
Penetration is directly dependent on the length of the APFSDS round and the 2A46M cannot accommodate rounds bigger than the Mango round.
Either we will have to use better materials like DU to achieve better penetration or we would require a new gun and autoloader on the exisiting T-72,T-90 fleet.
This photo was said as aftermath of an exercise (must be Russia) where a BMP-II mistakenly fired Konkurs ATGM against a T-90A. The crew survived however. But you can see the condition of the tank. Still of the crew survived, you can get an idea how much protection it provides. pic.twitter.com/TSW0yK2y7U
— Sankalan Chattopadhyay (@VinodDX9) May 26, 2021
LOL indigenous barrel is not superior to anything russian. Why don't you provide source for your claim.
Existing T 90 gun autoloader can achieve 600mm+ penetration.
This photo was said as aftermath of an exercise (must be Russia) where a BMP-II mistakenly fired Konkurs ATGM against a T-90A. The crew survived however. But you can see the condition of the tank. Still of the crew survived, you can get an idea how much protection it provides. pic.twitter.com/TSW0yK2y7U
— Sankalan Chattopadhyay (@VinodDX9) May 26, 2021
BS provide source.The Indian T-72 barrel has an EFC of 1700 versus the Russian supplied barrel with EFC of 250.
There's nothing weird about Russian equipment having shoddy build quality, globally known, which we have drastially improved upon after we begin license production.
2A46M can achieve 600m+ penetration . mango M APFSDS has certified penetration of 560mm LOS at 2km according to manufacturer itself. Svinets 2 can be fired using 2A46M using upgraded loader & it has 600m+ pen.Nope. Our gun, the 2A46M, can only manage 450-500mm. With a new shell, they are trying to achieve about 550mm.
What you are referring to is the latest 2A46M-5, which is only present on the T-90MS and the T-90M.
Any tank will become like that if you hit it from the side.
T 90A provide 715-725mm protection against KE and 1100 against CE but from front only.Any tank will become like that if you hit it from the side.
BS provide source.
2A46M can achieve 600m+ penetration . mango M APFSDS has certified penetration of 560mm LOS at 2km according to manufacturer itself. Svinets 2 can be fired using 2A46M using upgraded loader & it has 600m+ pen.
![]()
None of OFB 125mm gun are better than russian gun. You either provide source or take your words back.You will have to find it yourself. Google 2A46 Maple, it's OFB's gun with thier own barrel made using their own production techniques.
Lol. Okay.Lol. Okay.
None of OFB 125mm gun are better than russian gun. You either provide source or take your words back.
Lol. Okay.
Ha ha! I will tell you there is no such barrel superior to russian one either.Not gun. Barrel. You will have to find it yourself. It will help you find other things in the process. 2A46 Maple autofrettage.
2A46M gun on our T 90 can fire svinets 2 ( the round on the above pic is svinets 2 ). You don't need a new gun , just need to upgrade autoloader. It's written on it. DOP will be low though.No clue what you want me to see, but the gun we have on the T-90 is the 2A46M. Only 2A46M-2 was upgraded to handle long rods. The biggest round we can use is the Mango. For Lekalo and Svinets, we need the new 2A46M-5.