It does.
Not really, India doesn't have friends or enemies due to the way it plays the game.
They've always fought against Russian equipment, with Russian money propelling it.
Errr.... no. They benefits net exporters and hurt net importers.
The 'pro-China' party is only slightly more pro-China. Neither party seriously wants to join because people tend to not want to throw away their rights.
You're contradicting yourself again.
Yeah.Lol, no.
Are you seriously saying the west was a friend to China? Only pre-Revolution.We have enemies. And our enemies have friends. The West was a friend to both our enemies at one point. So, no, you don't know what you're talking about.
Against Israel.The SU were their enemies. In Russia's case, it makes more sense for them to work with the Arabs, that's all.
Prices haven't reached that point though. Exporters prefer $80-90 rather than $60-70. It's only at $120 that it starts becoming concerning.When importers go into a recession, it hurts their exports. And it increases the prices of their imports.
That will never happen after seeing what happened in HK. No one will vote to lose their civil rights. 'Pro-China' simply means trying to work wit China more, not joining them.I'm not entirely sure about that. Some of the KMT proponents are quite pro-China. It's why China's holding on hope for a unification, or even a Hong Kong style system.
Exactly, least popular.There are basically three groups. One group is similar to DPP, but want to hand over the strait to China. The second group is pro-China and prefers diplomacy over military deterrence to maintain sovereignty. The third group consists of OG KMT members, they want full reunification, although they are the least popular. The second one is most popular, but very dangerous to Taiwan's military capabilities.
Russia doesn't care about anyone period, but yes they use Israel as a punch bag because the other punch bags will hit back harder. That still makes them enemies though.It's 'cause you are failing to understand the issues. Russia doesn't care as much as you think about Israel, but are happy that the West is distracted.
Not in the case of Hamas or Hezbollah.But at the same time, the Russians and Israelis cooperate when dealing with terrorism 'cause it's of mutual benefit.
You just made those words up.They also have a shared goal of kicking Iran out of Syria, which is why they allow Israeli airstrikes into Syria targeting Iran and its proxies.
Are you seriously saying the west was a friend to China? Only pre-Revolution.
Prices haven't reached that point though. Exporters prefer $80-90 rather than $60-70. It's only at $120 that it starts becoming concerning.
That will never happen after seeing what happened in HK. No one will vote to lose their civil rights. 'Pro-China' simply means trying to work wit China more, not joining them.
Exactly, least popular.
Russia doesn't care about anyone period, but yes they use Israel as a punch bag because the other punch bags will hit back harder. That still makes them enemies though.
Not in the case of Hamas or Hezbollah.
You just made those words up.
Literally the opposite of reality. Russia is the one with constant meatwave assaults. They don't give a shit about minimizing their own casualties. When an assault fails, instead of letting their assault troops retreat to try again later, they kill their own troops with barrier troops. And no, that's not just the prisoners who are treated like this. Anyone can be sent to a Storm-Z battalion, for any arbitrary reason. Even well-trained specialists.'Cause they have no intention of doing that, they want a slow grind 'cause it minimizes casualties on their side and the UAF's tactics are so harebrained that it's working in Russia's favor. It's all 'cause Ukraine is pushing a lot of troops towards Russia's offensives. And the West is draining money as well.
It's funny how few people have any reading comprehension. When Zaluzhny said according to NATO standards Ukraine should have reached Crimea in four month, that was to point out that he cannot follow NATO standards (America was too busy denying F-16 and ATACMS until long after the counter-offensive had stalled).The truth:
Literally the opposite of reality. Russia is the one with constant meatwave assaults. They don't give a shit about minimizing their own casualties. When an assault fails, instead of letting their assault troops retreat to try again later, they kill their own troops with barrier troops. And no, that's not just the prisoners who are treated like this. Anyone can be sent to a Storm-Z battalion, for any arbitrary reason. Even well-trained specialists.
It's funny how few people have any reading comprehension. When Zaluzhny said according to NATO standards Ukraine should have reached Crimea in four month, that was to point out that he cannot follow NATO standards (America was too busy denying F-16 and ATACMS until long after the counter-offensive had stalled).
No. In 1969 China was still arming the NVA. After that they gave them some support against local Soviet proxies in the late '70s and '80s but it was limited and never friendship.
China did a lot itself that India never did.It's what allowed China to open up its economy and receive a lot of military technology. For example, America transferred FBW tech, Israel transferred radar and missile tech, along with other tech related to Lavi. The PL-8 is basically Israel's Python 3 missile. The J-10 uses an Israeli radar called EL/M-2035. Grumman was involved in developing the J-10's airframe and control laws. Sweden provided AIP tech for submarines. Germany provided diesel engine tech, most of their ships still have German diesel engines. Americans also provided jet engine tech, which is how they developed the WS-10. We actually do not know the extent of technology provided by the West to China during this period.
The West did it with the hopes that China will become a democracy. But after the massacre in 1989, military cooperation ended. And lessons learned then were applied on India, so the US prevented significant tech transfers for over 30 years to India.
It wouldn't, a global recession would happen long before that.A war will boost prices to 250.
We do. There's more chance of India unifying under Pakistan.We don't know that.
The others are just looking for economic angles.The others groups aren't any better. KMT is overall more pro-China than necessary.
Same difference when you're friends with that many of them. That something India has never understood fully.No. Just friends of Israel's enemies.
Hezbollah are on Assad's side in Syria, same as Russians. Russia supports both.Against Hamas, they don't care. Against Hezbollah, they do. Particularly the ones in Syria.
Nah, you just made it up.Nope. Everybody knows this.
Thats a western media not russian , you should ask the boys & girls in whitehouse on whats going on.Bullshit.
This is one of the dumbest things I have come across lately. It is unsurprisingly being spread on pro-Russian and Russo-neutral sources.Doesn't Ukraine only have a limited number of these western equipment especially tanks? (14 Challengers here 30 Abrams there)According to pro-Russian sources the limited number and the slow pace at which Ukraine receives western equipment never allows them to have a major impact on the war.So a limited number and a slow pace means Ukraine only needs a few people to operate them and can constantly replace the crews, which btw have a impressive survival rate when compared to old soviet stuff, the latest destroyed Leopards and Bradleys but even those destroyed during the start of summer offensive are enough evidence for that.This bs that Ukraine has no soldiers left has been going on since the start of the war now. Then who is doing all the fighting? Why can't Russia just steamroll Ukraine but instead keeps building up and reinforcing their defensive lines?Ukraine only lacks a serious number of western equipment at once to have a much bigger impact on this war...for the little stuff they have been given, they have done a much better job than most expected.
this if from western propaganda mouth pieceThe casualties are lopsided. Now even women are being drafted, that's a big clue.
'Cause they have no intention of doing that, they want a slow grind 'cause it minimizes casualties on their side and the UAF's tactics are so harebrained that it's working in Russia's favor. It's all 'cause Ukraine is pushing a lot of troops towards Russia's offensives. And the West is draining money as well.
The truth:
The Russians should end it by the end of next year though.
No. In 1969 China was still arming the NVA. After that they gave them some support against local Soviet proxies in the late '70s and '80s but it was limited and never friendship.
China did a lot itself that India never did.
It wouldn't, a global recession would happen long before that.
Hezbollah are on Assad's side in Syria, same as Russians. Russia supports both.
Nah, you just made it up.
this if from western propaganda mouth piece
What the TIME article means for Ukraine
The recent article in Time magazine about doubts in Ukraine was prepared in advance and was waiting to be publishednews.yahoo.com
Half of American media are pro-russian... And contrarily to russia, the medias in the West are not controlled by the government and can say whatever they want, including bullshit.Thats a western media not russian , you should ask the boys & girls in whitehouse on whats going on.
US was still enemies with both of them, but Soviet expansionism was the biggest problem at the time. India enjoyed shooting itself in the foot.In 1969 China officially became enemies with the SU. So India signed a Friendship Treaty with the SU in 1971 and China followed that with a similar treaty in 1973, and opened up its economy to the West in 1974.
They did a lot for themselves too. 6G etc.Nope. They bought a stole a lot. India doesn't steal and wasn't allowed to buy.
The price of oil will never reach $250.Prices will climb up and then a recession will happen, 'cause prices will climb up in a matter of weeks.
Fact. Russia supports all trouble-makers in the region and elsewhere.Lol.
You making sh1t up isn't my problem. This is why many of you are disliked on Twitter, you try and muddy the water with made up garbage that doesn't exist outside your own mind, plus mass false equivalency.Your ignorance isn't my problem.
Bet that golden spike is long gone though.Half of American media are pro-russian... And contrarily to russia, the medias in the West are not controlled by the government and can say whatever they want, including bullshit.
Claiming the problem is that Ukraine doesn't have enough personnel to use the 10 or so tanks it has been oh so generously given is self-evidently bullshit. If the West wanted the offensive to be successful, wanted Ukraine to reach Crimea in four month, then they should have given thousands of armored vehicles, as well as hundreds of combat aircraft. This is obvious to anyone who uses their brain instead of shutting it off and letting russian propaganda do the thinking for them.
America has been very vocal about promising a ton of stuff, and then finding excuses to not actually deliver. Which isn't surprising when you know that the entire GOP is vehemently pro-russia.
Meanwhile, russia still sucks:
100 billion rubles were spent to build a ten-meter railway that's not connected to anything.
when US govt sings , its media dances.Half of American media are pro-russian... And contrarily to russia, the medias in the West are not controlled by the government and can say whatever they want, including bullshit.