Ukraine - Russia Conflict

They wouldn't have been able to do that if they themselves weren't getting weapons and food from the UK and US.
The Soviet Union aided China from 1938 to 1941. During this period, the West did not provide aid to the Soviet Union, during this period, the Soviet Union provided a large number of interest-free loans and free aid to China. More importantly, a large and sufficient supply of weapons was provided. The most elite Kuomintang troops were already using Soviet weapons. And what was the United States doing? They are exporting oil and scrap steel to Japan. Of course, this history has been deliberately erased by the Taiwanese government. But the Chinese people always remember them. Up to now, there are monuments and memorials to commemorate Soviet pilots in Wuhan.
.
 
The Soviet Union aided China from 1938 to 1941. During this period, the West did not provide aid to the Soviet Union, during this period, the Soviet Union provided a large number of interest-free loans and free aid to China. More importantly, a large and sufficient supply of weapons was provided. The most elite Kuomintang troops were already using Soviet weapons. And what was the United States doing? They are exporting oil and scrap steel to Japan. Of course, this history has been deliberately erased by the Taiwanese government. But the Chinese people always remember them. Up to now, there are monuments and memorials to commemorate Soviet pilots in Wuhan.
.
During that period the USSR were allied to the Nazis via the Molotov-Ribbetrop Pact.


And you're still wrong:


Chiang's army received $250 million worth of tanks, trucks, and aircraft from the Soviet Union in 1938, plus some British and French military supplies. Nevertheless, by the summer of 1939 Japan controlled most of northeastern China and all major coastal seaports, except for the British Crown Colony at Hong Kong. In short, China was isolated except for supplies moving from the west along the so-called Burma Road or through French Indochina.

Joining in widespread international condemnation of Japan's aggression, the United States circumspectly supported China. President Roosevelt approved $25 million in military aid to China on 19 December 1940, permitting the Chinese to purchase one hundred P 40 pursuit aircraft
By late spring 1941, the United States had also earmarked over $145 million in lend-lease funds for China to acquire both ground and air equipment. In May 1941, Secretary of War Henry Stimson approved a Chinese request for sufficient equipment to outfit thirty infantry divisions, intended for delivery by mid- 1942. Prompted by his private adviser, Claire L. Chennault, a retired U.S. Army Air Corps officer, Chiang also obtained Roosevelt's support for an American Volunteer Group (AVG) of about one hundred U.S. civilian volunteers to fly the one hundred recently purchased P-40s. These "Flying Tigers" began arriving in Burma in late 1941, the first Americans actually to be fighting alongside the Chinese.
Having responded to disparate Chinese requests for specific arms, General Marshall moved quickly to ensure tighter coordination between Chinese requirements and U.S. production plans. He established the American Military Mission to China (AMMISCA) on 3 July 1941 under Brig. Gen. John Magruder, an officer with previous China experience. Rather than simply serve as a conduit for Nationalist requests for supplies, Marshall directed Magruder to advise the Chinese on their military needs and ensure a closer match between those needs and the capabilities of U.S. defense production.

You also have to allow for the fact that the Soviet's had a land border with you, the US and UK didn't and weren't really particularly close either. Plus the UK was also fighting Germany alone from 1939-1942, as well as Japan, and it was every much an existential threat at that stage.
 
Last edited:
During that period the USSR were allied to the Nazis via the Molotov-Ribbetrop Pact.


And you're still wrong:






You also have to allow for the fact that the Soviet's had a land border with you, the US and UK didn't and weren't really particularly close either. Plus the UK was also fighting Germany alone from 1939-1942, as well as Japan, and it was every much an existential threat at that stage.
What you extract from the National Archives of the United States is different from the actual situation. According to the Republic of China archives. China never got the equipment for 30 infantry divisions. The Burma Road was cut off by the Japanese in the early days. The main equipment provided by the United States has been the equipment of the troops stationed in India, mainly the equipment of three to four divisions, but also mainly used in Southeast Asia. It's not particularly helpful at home. Most of the equipment of the so-called 30 infantry divisions was used to aid the Soviet Union and the North African battlefield. It was not until 1944 that the Burma Road was reopened. The amount of American aid available in China is actually very small.

Soviet aid was different. In 1937. It turned out that China's German-trained and equipped forces had been nearly wiped out at Shanghai and Nanjing, and the Chinese Air Force was down to 30 aircraft. The Japanese had more than 900 aircraft. At that time, the Soviet Air Force transferred 233 active aircraft directly from the active forces as the first batch of assistance. And sent its best pilots into battle. And then came the aid, 904 aircraft in all. The Army. China organized 10 assault armies using Soviet weapons. Using these forces, China won the Battle of Zaoyi, the Battle of Kunlun Pass and the Battle of Changsha. It stopped the Japanese invasion. China and Japan have entered a phase of stalemate.
 
During that period the USSR were allied to the Nazis via the Molotov-Ribbetrop Pact.


And you're still wrong:






You also have to allow for the fact that the Soviet's had a land border with you, the US and UK didn't and weren't really particularly close either. Plus the UK was also fighting Germany alone from 1939-1942, as well as Japan, and it was every much an existential threat at that stage.
It's actually in the lend-lease act in the United States. China was at the bottom of the pack, and a lot of material that should have belonged to China was diverted to other battlefields. And the Chinese forces, which use a lot of American equipment, are actually used in Southeast Asia. They are not playing their rightful role on China's domestic battlefields. The real Chinese army began to be equipped with Western weapons on a large scale after 1944. But for the Chinese battlefield. The most dangerous period was actually from 1937 to 1941. The Japanese army attacked China with all its forces. China had to rely on troops trained in early cooperation with Germany and a few warlord forces to fight, while Soviet aid was like a spring rain on an arid land. It made up for the huge losses of the Chinese army in 1937 and 1938.
 
Plus the UK was also fighting Germany alone from 1939-1942, as well as Japan, and it was every much an existential threat at that stage.
When did Britain start a war with Japan in 1937? After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japan began a large-scale offensive in Southeast Asia. It was in Burma in 1941. The British army disregarded the defense treaty. Easily left behind the flanking Chinese troops. As a result, a large number of Chinese troops retreated without friendly cover. A large number of Soviet-assisted T-26 tanks and 122mm artillery pieces were abandoned in Burma. China's only armored division, the 200th, was equipped by the Soviet Union. They were forced to abandon all their tanks and artillery. Back from the jungles of Burma.
 
What you extract from the National Archives of the United States is different from the actual situation.
Have you ever considered that your own archives may be different from the actual situation? I mean with a Communist government and all?

 
When did Britain start a war with Japan in 1937? After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japan began a large-scale offensive in Southeast Asia. It was in Burma in 1941. The British army disregarded the defense treaty. Easily left behind the flanking Chinese troops. As a result, a large number of Chinese troops retreated without friendly cover. A large number of Soviet-assisted T-26 tanks and 122mm artillery pieces were abandoned in Burma. China's only armored division, the 200th, was equipped by the Soviet Union. They were forced to abandon all their tanks and artillery. Back from the jungles of Burma.
British war with Germany began in 1939, war against Japan began in 1941. Britain did well to send any aid to China during that period since Russia was also helping Germany from 1939-1941. Many would argue that the USSR got far too much western aid during WWII and should have been left to stew in the soup of their own bad judgement. That's why the USSR was able to provide you the aid because they had agreed to divide Europe with the Nazis in 1939 and did so from 1939-1941. That's why we want to slap Putin every time he talks about fighting Nazis again. It's not like Russia chose to fight them the first time.
 
Have you ever considered that your own archives may be different from the actual situation? I mean with a Communist government and all?

You can find extremely detailed information about the things I described on the Taiwan Internet, which is not related to the Communist Party
 
British war with Germany began in 1939, war against Japan began in 1941. Britain did well to send any aid to China during that period since Russia was also helping Germany from 1939-1941. Many would argue that the USSR got far too much western aid during WWII and should have been left to stew in the soup of their own bad judgement. That's why the USSR was able to provide you the aid because they had agreed to divide Europe with the Nazis in 1939 and did so from 1939-1941. That's why we want to slap Putin every time he talks about fighting Nazis again. It's not like Russia chose to fight them the first time.
In fact, before 1941, Chinese people did not receive a single bullet or rifle from Britain. On the contrary, Britain pursued a policy of appeasement towards Japan. Prohibited a large amount of war supplies purchased by China from entering China from Myanmar. Before 1941, Britain was an accomplice to Japan. Until 1941, Japan launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. However, during the most difficult period of the War of Resistance Against Japan, the Soviet Union provided China with a large number of planes, tanks, artillery, and rifles. At that time, the British were trying to compromise with Japan. Prohibit China from purchasing war materials from the international community through Myanmar. At that time, China purchased a large number of lathes and metallurgical equipment, but the British closed the Burma Road. China has to sell the cheap ones in India
 
d agreed to divide Europe with the Nazis in 1939 and did so from 1939-1941. That's why we want to slap Putin every time he talks about fighting Nazis again. It's not like Russia chose to fight them the first time.
In fact, the main reason why Germany was able to launch aggression was in England and France. When Germany invaded the Sudetenland region. Britain and France chose to compromise with Nazi Germany. When Germany invaded Poland. Although Britain and France declared war on Germany. But in reality, no military action was taken. Until Germany destroyed France in four weeks.
 
So I say Indians know nothing about real history. At the very beginning of the Han Empire, the Western Regions Capital Guard was set up in Xinjiang. And stationed a large number of troops. They can also appoint local governors. The local states became vassals of the Han Empire.

This is not at all the same as the Indians collecting tributes from Southeast Asia.

Yo can place troops in your protectorate, but you can't control it, that's why it's a tributary state.

Are you saying S Korea and Japan belong to the US by that logic?

I don't have any desire to discuss it with you. China is a multi-ethnic country. The Chinese government respects the history and culture of all ethnic groups. And the formation of modern Chinese civilization through mutual communication. As for India. His ethnic language and religion are much more numerous than China's. If China should not exist as a multi-ethnic state. Then India should be divided. And the split is even more complete.

Almost all countries in the world are multi-ethnic.

You can claim to be a single country only if you federalize and become a democratic republic like India. If India was communist or a dictatorship, then what you said would apply.

It's because UK was a monarchy that may kingdoms like Scotland and Ireland had separatist tendencies. Even today there are separatist movements in the UK that are strong. Otoh, a massive country like the US has very little separatists because it's a democratic republic.

This is what Dalai Lama said:
"I prefer the concept of a 'republic' in the People's Republic of China. In the concept of republic, ethnic minorities are like Tibetans, The Mongols, Manchus, and Xinjiang Uyghurs, we can live in harmony."

This is basically what India has.

So turn from People's Republic of China to "Democratic" Republic of China and you can claim all the invaded territories, as long as the locals vote for integration.
 
I'm starting to think you're a clown yourself. Let's not mention India, let's not mention the Golden Temple incident in Sikkim in the last century, and let's not mention the long history of Indian oppression of Kashmiri Muslims. India alone these last few years. Purges and massacres by the police and army in the northeastern states of India. That's enough on the international news. And all you did was plug your ears. To create a harmonious society in your fantasy India.

You are thinking about small, isolated incidents. In India, there were no massive purges by Hindus against anyone in its entire history.

There were only riots and war-related deaths. No Hindu king in India has ever woken up from sleep and said, "Let's kill this entire group of people today."

Massacres were more common in the Middle East, China and Europe.

Golden Temple was a terrorist-hostage situation, not a massacre. Even the Sikhs today agree it was necessary.

You should read what "massacre" really means. Even Northeast incidents were related to terrorism. All these situations have ended as India became richer and development started reaching villages. Funny how that works.

Both the Punjab insurgency and Northeast insurgencies were fueled by Pakistan and China. So it wasn't local either.


A massacre is when you line up helpless people and execute them, ISIS style or Nazi style against Jews.

In India, it was mainly Hindus who were victims of massacres.
 
I'm starting to think you're a clown yourself. Let's not mention India, let's not mention the Golden Temple incident in Sikkim in the last century, and let's not mention the long history of Indian oppression of Kashmiri Muslims. India alone these last few years. Purges and massacres by the police and army in the northeastern states of India. That's enough on the international news. And all you did was plug your ears. To create a harmonious society in your fantasy India.
I'm starting to think you're a clown yourself. Let's not mention India, let's not mention the Golden Temple incident in Sikkim in the last century, and let's not mention the long history of Indian oppression of Kashmiri Muslims. India alone these last few years. Purges and massacres by the police and army in the northeastern states of India. That's enough on the international news. And all you did was plug your ears. To create a harmonious society in your fantasy India.
Listen up you noodleslurping buffoon. Kashmir is Hindu land. The existence of muslims there is artificial and illegal. No circumcised inbred is being oppressed in Kashmir. They roam freely and throw stones all the time at everyone. As for golden temple it was a terrorist situation not a massacre. You have no idea what happened and what led to that event.
Also a slit eyed lying mongrel like you shouldn't be lecturing anyone about harmonious society. We know fully well how artificial your society is. Everybody knows the situation of Tibetan and Uyghurs in your Great Chongland.
 
In fact, the main reason why Germany was able to launch aggression was in England and France. When Germany invaded the Sudetenland region. Britain and France chose to compromise with Nazi Germany. When Germany invaded Poland. Although Britain and France declared war on Germany. But in reality, no military action was taken. Until Germany destroyed France in four weeks.
The USSR invaded Poland with the Nazis, so what was the UK supposed to do, take them both on at the same time?

 
You can find extremely detailed information about the things I described on the Taiwan Internet, which is not related to the Communist Party
I've proved that help began before 1942, which was impressivge considering Britain was under existential threat from a Soviet-backed Germany and Japan.
 
In fact, the main reason why Germany was able to launch aggression was in England and France. When Germany invaded the Sudetenland region. Britain and France chose to compromise with Nazi Germany. When Germany invaded Poland. Although Britain and France declared war on Germany. But in reality, no military action was taken. Until Germany destroyed France in four weeks.

  • 1937–41 – British public and official opinion favours China in its war against Japan, but Britain focuses on defending Singapore and the Empire and can give little help. It does provide training in India for Chinese infantry divisions, and air bases in India used by the Americans to fly supplies and warplanes to China.[40]

At least we didn't invade you 4 years after WWII like the Soviets effectively did, using territory they stole from you in the 19th century as a staging ground.
Listen up you noodleslurping buffoon. Kashmir is Hindu land. The existence of muslims there is artificial and illegal.
:ROFLMAO:
 
1704621301218.png
 
Listen up you noodleslurping buffoon. Kashmir is Hindu land. The existence of muslims there is artificial and illegal. No circumcised inbred is being oppressed in Kashmir. They roam freely and throw stones all the time at everyone. As for golden temple it was a terrorist situation not a massacre. You have no idea what happened and what led to that event.
Also a slit eyed lying mongrel like you shouldn't be lecturing anyone about harmonious society. We know fully well how artificial your society is. Everybody knows the situation of Tibetan and Uyghurs in your Great Chongland.
Whoa! Calm it down!!!