Everyone is accused of communism for dollars gain, isn't this the cardinal rule?!? You people think everybody else is uneducated, without the means to gather information and understand it? There is a a thing called GOOGLE! Use it...1953, 71 f*cking years ago. And the Shah was removed in 1979, did Iran become a democracy in the 45 years since? Nope. Lumumba - 1960, 64 years ago. Both were guilty of cosing up to Stalin, a genocidal mass murderer who'd annexed half of Europe.
If someone supports a dictator who's a real existential threat to us, we will not support them, regardless of how they got to power. They may have been elected, but those are clearly not the ideals they are supporting.
The image you gave said 1953 but you've been spamming so much you probably didn't realise. You accuse us off not supporting democracies, yet you want us to support democracies who don't support democracy elsewhere. Very 2:1-sided standards don't you think? Who supports democracy more, NATO or Russia and China?View attachment 32144
Thank you very much for so much clearly saying UK & Western world doesn't want other countries & its people to have free will! All hail colonialism!!!
UK again did Congo in 2000s, come again....
Yes planting fake evidence, assassinations, discredit an honest & democratic elected person are go to tool for UK system, agreed. We are not new to divide & rule system of UK, you know!?!1953, 71 f*cking years ago. And the Shah was removed in 1979, did Iran become a democracy in the 45 years since? Nope. Lumumba - 1960, 64 years ago. Both were guilty of cosing up to Stalin, a genocidal mass murderer who'd annexed half of Europe.
If someone supports a dictator who's a real existential threat to us, we will not support them, regardless of how they got to power. They may have been elected, but those are clearly not the ideals they are supporting.
None of the three. They all work for their own bloody interests, there is no honour in what all 3 have done, are doing and will continue to do.The image you gave said 1953 but you've been spamming so much you probably didn't realise. You accuse us off not supporting democracies, yet you want us to support democracies who don't support democracy elsewhere. Very 2:1-sided standards don't you think? Who supports democracy more, NATO or Russia and China?
So the guy wanted to seize control of massive amounts of privately owned land, which is basically stealing. 70 years ago, middle of last century, just to distract from India's role in funding the Ukraine war. Also, many of these so-called democracies from the 1950s would certainly not score above 6 on this chart.Everyone is accused of communism for dollars gain, isn't this the cardinal rule?!? You people think everybody else is uneducated, without the means to gather information and understand it? There is a a thing called GOOGLE! Use it...
View attachment 32145
The image you gave said 1953 but you've been spamming so much you probably didn't realise. You accuse us off not supporting democracies, yet you want us to support democracies who don't support democracy elsewhere. Very 2:1-sided standards don't you think? Who supports democracy more, NATO or Russia and China?
1953. What was Stalin doing back then? What was Mao doing? How many Sikhs and Muslims was India mass murdering back then.Yes planting fake evidence, assassinations, discredit an honest & democratic elected person are go to tool for UK system, agreed. We are not new to divide & rule system of UK, you know!?!
View attachment 32146
None of the three. They all work for their own bloody interests, there is no honour in what all 3 have done, are doing and will continue to do.
Congo is not democratic, despite the name, not even close. As regards Pakistan and India, both of you are guilty of sectarian tribal warfare, but India supports Russian invasions too. You play a stupid game which inevitably leads to both the west and China supporting Pakistan against you and instead of rethinking it, you dredge up 70-year-old history to distract from your present-day wrong-doings.Goto post 21310 again read how UK knowingly continued to provide support to Rawanda & Pakistan military regimes despite them engaging in tribal warfare against a democratic nation. I have written quite a few times 2000s yet to continue to ignore those posts very conveniently...
So much ignorance on display here.So the guy wanted to seize control of massive amounts of privately owned land, which is basically stealing. 70 years ago, middle of last century, just to distract from India's role in funding the Ukraine war. Also, many of these so-called democracies from the 1950s would certainly not score above 6 on this chart.
Democracy Countries 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
Shows how ignorant UK people are, that must be by design seeing how far removed UK people are from GOOGLE!Australia, since 1945, what the shit?
Which was probably part of an existing deal that was paid for. Forcing them to pay taxes would have been one thing, but simply stealing the land and giving it to landless peasants is basically a Mugabe/Mao/Stalin. Given what it led to in those cases, i.e. mass famine/death, the country was probably better off for the coup. A quick Google shows only 2 people in the sitting government were killed and >100 from the other side. I don't justify it but hell, it was 70 f*cking years ago and the guy was an idiot.So much ignorance on display here.
US corporation wasn't paying taxes and people had rights to reforms.
You justified overthrow of a democratically elected government for people demand of reforms??? We had our own land reforms doesn't mean any Tom D!ck & Harry comes and do regime change?
Get your facts straight. The Australian government was deadlocked and they asked the UK to intervene. The viceroy dismissed the sitting government and held fresh elections, there was no coup, democracy continued and it was done by request. This is what happens when you get half-arsed knowledge from the internet/RT.Shows how ignorant UK people are, that must be by design seeing how far removed UK people are from GOOGLE!
View attachment 32148
WTF?This is probably the only possible explanation for friendly fire.
View attachment 32150
View attachment 32151
So you're saying Australia isn't a free democratic country where governments aren't established & removed by the votes of Australian citizens? Got it!Which was probably part of an existing deal that was paid for. Forcing them to pay taxes would have been one thing, but simply stealing the land and giving it to landless peasants is basically a Mugabe/Mao/Stalin. Given what it led to in those cases, i.e. mass famine/death, the country was probably better off for the coup. A quick Google shows only 2 people in the sitting government were killed and >100 from the other side. I don't justify it but hell, it was 70 f*cking years ago and the guy was an idiot.
Get your facts straight. The Australian government was deadlocked and they asked the UK to intervene. The viceroy dismissed the sitting government and held fresh elections, there was no coup, democracy continued and it was done by request. This is what happens when you get half-arsed knowledge from the internet/RT.
Guess which country's government propaganda channel claims It's not financing the Russian aggression while continuing to import Russian oil while some of UK citizens blame poor countries for enabling them to live good life. Hippocrates!?!Many of these Western world countries (including the country where sun never set) are munching on Russian oil & continue till day while lecturing poor countries to not consume Russian, Iranian and Venezuelan oil! Guess which country that might be?View attachment 32152