Ukraine - Russia Conflict


It's not really an excuse. Stuff that;s important in such command centers generally have kill switches that erase important data in computers.
Expensive equipment generally isn't left around for enemies.
It's under R&D by various companies, meant for the T-90's MLU.

I was referring to the MCS.

T-90s need APS more than any other modern battle tank, because their armour is crap.
 
Looks like good advice fell on deaf ears.


It's why you don't half-a*s a war. If you're going to war, once the first phase fails, you go all in.
 
Atgm's have the won the argument. Third gen and above atgm's can basically disable every tank doesn't matter if it's an Abrams or a t-55. Top attack munitions have made heavy armour obsolete. Even atgm's like the rpg 29 vampyr and kornet can easily pen challengers (which are by far the best protected tank on this planet without adding extra NERA or ERA). The Americans still haven't found a real counter to rpg 29 vampyr.

The way ATGMs are defeated is using helicopters to spot and kill, artillery for area damage, and infantry covering the flanks. Russia isn't using any of these. Their tanks are trying to Rambo the frig out of ATGMs.
 
The way ATGMs are defeated is using helicopters to spot and kill, artillery for area damage, and infantry covering the flanks. Russia isn't using any of these. Their tanks are trying to Rambo the frig out of ATGMs.
Decent reconnaissance should be showing their positions. And helicopters Should be working together with tanks too but Russia have not established air superiority and their entire C4ISR structure is almost non-existent. It's probably also hindered by the fact that none of his troops want to be there and probably don't believe in what they're fighting for. That said, war in Europe is different to war in the desert, it's generally much harder to see your enemy and our weather is generally shit, which sucks for visibility. It was one stupid war to get into for Putin and I can't see him still being President at the end of it, it's just a matter of when.
 
Expensive equipment generally isn't left around for enemies.

The personnel are more important due to their training. The equipment can be left behind after it's been made unusable. The US did the same in Afghanistan.

T-90s need APS more than any other modern battle tank, because their armour is crap.

The T-90's armour is as good as what was available in the 90s in the West. It provides up to 800mm of RHA protection. The T-90MS goes up to 1000mm. And since then not much has changed in the West, only add-on armour was added, and Russian tanks also get the same upgrades.

Against top attack, none of the tanks in the West are good enough.
 
Apparently his generals sent him an anonymous message saying, "Stop now."

They are not that stupid. The Russians only have to reorient and destroy the enemy. Winning or losing is only a matter of them changing their objectives.

It's in the world's long term interests that the Russians finish the war on their terms. Or we will only see a Part 2 and that time the Russians could include NATO in some capacity. The objective the West set out to achieve has more or less been achieved. Russia's under sanctions, grativating towards China and has been set up for long term isolation.
 
Decent reconnaissance should be showing their positions. And helicopters Should be working together with tanks too but Russia have not established air superiority and their entire C4ISR structure is almost non-existent. It's probably also hindered by the fact that none of his troops want to be there and probably don't believe in what they're fighting for.

Funny that the Russians are not taking this war seriously.

That said, war in Europe is different to war in the desert, it's generally much harder to see your enemy and our weather is generally shit, which sucks for visibility.

The exact opposite. There's nowhere to hide in deserts, the enemy is very easily visible.

It was one stupid war to get into for Putin and I can't see him still being President at the end of it, it's just a matter of when.

Putin will stay in power. Their firepower is something else entirely when they go all-out.

Zelensky is taking this time to eliminate all his political rivals and the Russians will eventually push him towards a surrender where he will stay in power while becoming largely subservient to Russia. Ukraine can't fight a second war with the Russians.
 
The operational situation in Mariupol on March 23:

msg-1310984791-23270.jpg
 
Funny that the Russians are not taking this war seriously.



The exact opposite. There's nowhere to hide in deserts, the enemy is very easily visible.



Putin will stay in power. Their firepower is something else entirely when they go all-out.

Zelensky is taking this time to eliminate all his political rivals and the Russians will eventually push him towards a surrender where he will stay in power while becoming largely subservient to Russia. Ukraine can't fight a second war with the Russians.
I don't know how you can lose 15,000 men in 4 weeks and not be taking it seriously. If this was a western country and our government did something like this, there'd be millions protesting and the media would destroy the leader, forcing him to resign.

That is actually what I said, if you re-read. It's harder to see enemies in Europe, and the ground off-road is often unfit for heavy vehicles or otherwise.

I'm not so sure, and there are limits to what raw firepower can achieve.

They won't have to fight a second war after this. Putin has destroyed Russia. It will be a while before any Russian leader attempts something this stupid ever again.
The operational situation in Mariupol on March 23:

View attachment 23011
Damn, have Russia still not taken that city they've had surrounded for weeks now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaktimaan
The personnel are more important due to their training. The equipment can be left behind after it's been made unusable. The US did the same in Afghanistan.
I'm not sure it's correct to assume the personnel have had training from what I've seen. The US did the same with Humvees and stuff, not crucial EW kit.

The T-90's armour is as good as what was available in the 90s in the West. It provides up to 800mm of RHA protection. The T-90MS goes up to 1000mm. And since then not much has changed in the West, only add-on armour was added, and Russian tanks also get the same upgrades.
O RLY?

1648070417121.png


1648070458324.png


1648070471175.png


Against top attack, none of the tanks in the West are good enough.
Against top attack maybe, but you don't need top attack to kill T-90s.
 
They are not that stupid. The Russians only have to reorient and destroy the enemy. Winning or losing is only a matter of them changing their objectives.

It's in the world's long term interests that the Russians finish the war on their terms. Or we will only see a Part 2 and that time the Russians could include NATO in some capacity. The objective the West set out to achieve has more or less been achieved. Russia's under sanctions, grativating towards China and has been set up for long term isolation.
I don't think the world agrees with you, we'd rather not see European democracies invaded by some slap-head Hitler, whether they're members of NATO or not. And Ukraine itself certainly wouldn't.

The best solution for the world and Russia is the collapse of Putin's regime and Putin in the Hague. That's also the legally correct outcome too and the only one that has a chance of getting sanctions lifted anytime this century.
 
Some Challenger IIs have survived hits from RPG-28 and -29 and Kornets in Iraq but they are not top-attack. Hard-kill protection systems can defeat top-attack, but that's about it.
That's because superior design choices of the western tanks even abrams would "survive" a hit from the vampyr point is you will most probably still lose one crewmember atleast if a vampyr hits.

Also no aps still can't stop a top attack munition. No one in the market. The Russians managed to make a one that can stop apfsds. But I doubt how effective they will be same for the Israelis. Right now any third gen atgm means the tank goes boom. It's sad really. Armoured warfare is really cool. But like guns made medivial armour obsolete same has happened with third gen atgm's they have heavy armour obsolete
 
I don't know how you can lose 15,000 men in 4 weeks and not be taking it seriously. If this was a western country and our government did something like this, there'd be millions protesting and the media would destroy the leader, forcing him to resign.

Autocratic countries can absorb more losses, the West cannot. Plus the main war is being fought on the diplomatic table. The Russians have shifted to concentrate on one city at a time. So after Mariupol, we may see Russian forces concentrating on Kharkiv or Odessa. After both fall, they may move on to Dnipro or take out the Ukrainian military in the Donbas. Then they could take Sumy and Chernihiv. Every time they do this, the more pressure Zelensky is under to surrender, because there's a good chance the Russians won't return territories won by blood.
Against top attack maybe, but you don't need top attack to kill T-90s.

Then we would have seen a lot more photos than just a handful.
 
I don't think the world agrees with you, we'd rather not see European democracies invaded by some slap-head Hitler, whether they're members of NATO or not. And Ukraine itself certainly wouldn't.

The best solution for the world and Russia is the collapse of Putin's regime and Putin in the Hague. That's also the legally correct outcome too and the only one that has a chance of getting sanctions lifted anytime this century.

It's not gonna happen, which is why Russia's gotta finish this war on their own terms.