
This Ukrainian UAV Destroyed a Total of $100 Million Worth of Targets in the russian Rear | Defense Express
Sych reconnaissance-and-strike aerial suicide drones are used for attacks on enemy manpower, armor, and strongholds

You keep supporting Ukrainian Neo Nazi regime while Muzlim make London londonistan.....![]()
JFC, you're going straight to ignore for that comment. You don't even believe what you're posting, you know it to be a lie. Difference of opinion I have time for, deliberate lying I don't. A million people are probably going to die as a result of Putin's War. That's far more likely to be a fact. Russian dead and seriously wounded alone currently stand at 600k.
This war keep getting more & more of a hell for soldier with no way out......... Days of man are over, Age of Drones have come.The new FPV drone "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky" controlled via fiber optic cable has begun to be used by the Russian army in the Kursk region. The Russian FPV drone "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky" was developed by the Novgorod Scientific and Production Center "Ushkuynik", the manufacturer did not provide technical details and photos of the drone.
As reported, the drone was used in the Kursk region to attack Ukrainian armored vehicles about seven times. Control of the drone "Vandal" via fiber optic cable provides complete invulnerability from electronic warfare equipment, and you can also see excellent image quality. The disadvantages of this method of controlling the drone include limitations on range and flight routes and a higher price for the drone.
I think it will even out in the long run, this also makes harder for larger powers to win wars. Their advanced weapon systems wont matter much when they fight against smaller opponent who use simpler cheaper drones as force multipliers to harass them. At the end of the day more boots on the ground has greater chances of winning the war.This war keep getting more & more of a hell for soldier with no way out......... Days of man are over, Age of Drones have come.
Take out the factories that produce the drones and supporting industries. Take out the storage bases and transport vehicles. Small drones that home in on drone control emissions (SEAD for drones).I think it will even out in the long run, this also makes harder for larger powers to win wars. Their advanced weapon systems wont matter much when they fight against smaller opponent who use simpler cheaper drones as force multipliers to harass them. At the end of the day more boots on the ground has greater chances of winning the war.
you seriously dont need advanced industry or mega factories to build drones, most of the parts are available in consumer space and can be assembled by amateurs. drones can be pre-programmed to recognize landmarks & their radio emissions can be reduced to a large extent, its not they need to access or emit signals constantly.Take out the factories that produce the drones and supporting industries. Take out the storage bases and transport vehicles. Small drones that home in on drone control emissions (SEAD for drones).
Depends on the type of drone. Many people can build drones but not in massive volumes, you need a factory for that.you seriously dont need advanced industry or mega factories to build drones, most of the parts are available in consumer space and can be assembled by amateurs. drones can be pre-programmed to recognize landmarks & their radio emissions can be reduced to a large extent, its not they need to access or emit signals constantly.
The had the forces spare guarding their border regions. This is just using what was previously unused.