That's true for all nations.
It's not significantly more than 2.3m barrels per days and it's a lower percentage, so has a smaller % effect on economy. Saudi Arabia sells them more and guess who Saudi Arabia is likely to side with with reference to Pakistan.
Puppet regime is the same thing. They will need troops on the ground to have any chance of maintaining a pro-Russian regime on the ground after this and the G7 has already determined that Russian troops in Ukraine = sanctions stay in place.tin can either pull out or go bust.
They won't after seeing what happened with the 500 airliners that got seized and knowing that their investments could be impacted by sanctions at any time due to the Russian government being complete nut-jobs. The US and Europe are larger and more stable markets.
Global Firepower - 2022 World Military Strength Rankings are going to have to reassess their ranking, Russia is currently the second strongest military in Ukraine, not the world.
That page is full of propaganda. Chinese and Muslim trolls lecturing on morality.
Yes, it is possible. But I have the impression that this is the new plan, and that the initial plan was more ambitious because the Russians did not expect such strong resistance from the Ukrainians.Nope. In fact I guessed right in Jan on how it will unfold.
If anything I don't think Phase I will roll over to that extent, while Phase III won't happen at all. Meaning I doubt the Russians will ever cross the river or threaten Odessa.Ukraine - Russia Conflict
How much dependent are our armed forces on Ukraine? I can list two important areas 1. Zorya Gas Turbines in Talwar class and our destroyers 2. An32 RE Any more ??? Any conflict with Russia will hamper or Spares supply.www.strategicfront.org
They can take over the regions east of the river and then use their forces in Belarus to threaten Kiev for a settlement.
Taking over land up to the river will keep the Russians safe as well, even if Kiev doesn't settle. They will have an insurgency in their hands though.
So the Russians have concentrated on P2. Now one can argue they failed to achieve P1 or 3, but I don't believe that was the case, at least to the extent the narrative is being pushed. As already pointed out before, the Russians are fighting with a massive numerical disadvantage. And their numbers are going down while Ukrainian numbers are going up. So the objectives will be more realistic, like taking the south and east, where actual Russian interests are in play and the population is more receptive to Russian presence. Plus it doesn't make sense to cross the river, since the river can form a good defensive line against NATO.
@Picdelamirand-oil
Nope. In fact I guessed right in Jan on how it will unfold.
If anything I don't think Phase I will roll over to that extent, while Phase III won't happen at all. Meaning I doubt the Russians will ever cross the river or threaten Odessa.Ukraine - Russia Conflict
How much dependent are our armed forces on Ukraine? I can list two important areas 1. Zorya Gas Turbines in Talwar class and our destroyers 2. An32 RE Any more ??? Any conflict with Russia will hamper or Spares supply.www.strategicfront.org
They can take over the regions east of the river and then use their forces in Belarus to threaten Kiev for a settlement.
Taking over land up to the river will keep the Russians safe as well, even if Kiev doesn't settle. They will have an insurgency in their hands though.
So the Russians have concentrated on P2. Now one can argue they failed to achieve P1 or 3, but I don't believe that was the case, at least to the extent the narrative is being pushed. As already pointed out before, the Russians are fighting with a massive numerical disadvantage. And their numbers are going down while Ukrainian numbers are going up. So the objectives will be more realistic, like taking the south and east, where actual Russian interests are in play and the population is more receptive to Russian presence. Plus it doesn't make sense to cross the river, since the river can form a good defensive line against NATO.
@Picdelamirand-oil
Oh don't worry, all NATO spending has increased across the board, with the US now at $0.8tr. A local and active threat is a local and active threat regardless of (in)competence levels.I hope this isn't propaganda that actually spreads in the EU, to the point where militarisation is affected.
Because the RA you see here is a highly constrained RA. They are fighting with both hands tied behind their backs. They screwed up in their expectations, but if they actually fought a "war", Ukraine would have been long gone within this timeframe. So the EU shouldn't roll back its modernisation, rather it should be increased.