Take the UK and US. Both democratic, both capitalist, both have independent executive, judicial and legislative, both support free speech, equality and civil rights. Both speak the same language. Their friends are our friends, and the same goes for enemies.
What exactly does India have in common with Russia aside from the fact that members of your citizenry occasionally like talking sh1t about 'the west'* as evidenced above?
*Even though it's been a long time since 'the west' was just the west, if it even ever was.
Then your are a fool. The CCP wouldn't even exist were it not for Russia and now China has Russia by the balls anyway.
16% which they can buy from elsewhere at a slightly higher cost won't cause anything like the instability witnessed in Tiananmen Square in 1989, and they dealt with that, so they don't give two f*cks.
It already has diversified away from Russia and diversified its economy, far more so than Russia or India. You're kidding yourself, you know what your saying is false and you're just saying it anyway for the sake of argument.
It isn't lower than the likes of Saudi Arabia. If it wasn't about a monopoly for Russia then they wouldn't be in Ukraine or Syria, simple as that, no more evidence required.
Oh yeah, especially with all the equipment they lost, the general costs of deployment, all the sanctions, the destroyed ammo dump and oil depot. War is a great way to achieve a budget surplus. Dear me, let me talk to your teapot instead.
The only signal I see is a signal that your membership of the Quad is a waste of time, since you wouldn't actually help anyone else in need anyway, you just joined in the hope that they might help you when you are in need. Partners like that are no partners at all.