Burning Russian equipment near Izyum: more
Burning Russian equipment near Izyum: more
I guess it's easier to get permanent residence permits if you have the right passport.
When I retired I could settle just about anywhere in the world and even many countries offered to exempt me from taxes as an incentive to move there.
Need a honest answer,which tank in this world can survive a direct hit from Javelin? None I think. Even mighty Abrams will be a frying pan against JavelinT-XX tanks are just pressure cookers. You only put stuff in them that you want cooked.
Not decent ones it hasn't. Every piece of military equipment is always up for replacement but not at the rate we're talking about here.
And why can't they use them in India? Terrorists can use whatever, wherever, which is why supplying them is a bad idea.
NK already has ICBMs, so anything else they get is pretty much irrelevant at this stage. As for Iran, more worried about them getting nukes onto MRBMs and IRBMs than some reverse engineered ATGMs.
Don't kid yourself. Beslan Theatre.
DCS is full of crap when it comes to Russian weapon capabilities. DCS is waaaay to gracious to Russia.
Burke by itself was able to fend off 2-3 Yemeni antiship missiles fired at her but the Slava just totally failed. It's like the captain forgot he was in the middle of a warzone. Slava has like 500 hot Sailors on board I think... I do hope they get rescued.
Its an alarming bell for india too, for manybreasons.
1) Majority of our vessels were of Russian origin or loaded with Russian stuffs.
Leclerc tanks are no longer produced. For the rest, we have signed a strategic agreement with India, which remains valid. But it is India that has been holding back until now, I don't know if this has changed and even if it has, we will know much later.
Baraka,that's the only comforting factor.The Slava just has outdated air defences. Like the Osa. We use Barak-1s to stop such missiles.
Baraka,that's the only comforting factor.
B/W Moskva is defended by onboard S300 missiles.
Oh sure. Are you counting soldiers among those inventories too? What Ukraine has lost really is pittance compares to NATO inventories and industrial base.What they have lost is peanuts compared to their Soviet inventories.
Lol, 'cause the Pakistanis will keep it all for themselves.
No, their potential conventional forces will be the real threat. The US has the means to destroy NoKo's nukes. I don't think you have understood the scale of how destabilised the world will get due to this. The only real way out will be to reverse most of the sanctions on Russia once the war is over.
It doesn't affect state machinery. It stays localised. Sometimes it comes out, but is one-off.
Which is worse Beslan School or a potential attack on The London Palladium? There were attacks in Paris, Moscow and Mumbai too.
Probably but it depends where exactly it gets hit. Not sure it's ever been tried. Russian tanks have far less armour and less effective armour though.Need a honest answer,which tank in this world can survive a direct hit from Javelin? None I think. Even mighty Abrams will be a frying pan against Javelin
Oh sure. Are you counting soldiers among those inventories too?
What Ukraine has lost really is pittance compares to NATO inventories and industrial base.
You are foolish to think that.
The more you provide the more it comes out.
They can't replace any of it at the rate it's being destroyed. You even said yourself 500 tanks a year, that's clearly less than 700 MBTs in 7 weeks. As for missile cruisers, what's the timescale on those?Are you Joe Biden? I've already said that's the only thing they cannot replace.
Too bad they don't use NATO systems.
See it happening yourself.
You can look forward to terrorist attacks across Europe from here on. That's what you've invited home.