Ukraine - Russia Conflict

Russian driving on display.

In Belarus, the movement of a column of Russian equipment was recorded





 
Warehouses are burning, supplies are detonating, explosions are heard - it was a restless night in Alchevsk, Torez, Khartsyzk, Shakhtarsk, Kirovsk, Ilovaisk and Kalinin districts of Donetsk. In Shakhtarsk, due to fires and explosions, an evacuation was even announced, so far only within the city limits.
 
In this war the situation of Ukraine and Russia are not comparable. Ukraine is at home and has no logistical problems. For example, Ukraine fires 3000 shells per day and Russia at least 6 times more. The number of Russian trucks is not sufficient to ensure the corresponding logistics and the Russians use the train to compensate. But the last few kilometres to the front have to be done by truck, so there are depots near the railways and near the front. The distance between the front and the depots is determined by the number of trucks available: the further away they are, the safer they are, but the more trucks are needed to ensure the flow to the front.

Long-range weapons are therefore important on the Ukrainian side to complicate Russian logistics while they have a negligible effect on the Russian side because Ukrainian logistics are not stretched.

All that is fine. But you need numbers to make that happen. One of the objectives of MLRS is interdiction, but nothing much can be done without numbers.

Generally speaking, the situation is very unbalanced between the two belligerents:


And yet the Ukrainians are resisting, but they need to improve their assets which is being done.

We now know that the Russian casualties are so low because regular troops are barely even fighting in offensives. Most of the fighting is being done by militias and PMC. Only artillery is being used by regular troops, and of course some additional units to support some thrusts that require considerable vehicle-based firepower.

Ukr isn't "resisting", the front is moving slowly by design. The Russians are simply forcing the Ukrainians to protect terrain that cannot be protected without taking high casualties.

The Russian tactic is simple. Russia starts pounding a major Ukr position. And as Ukrainians die, more come in to reinforce, and this cycle repeats. After enough of the infrastructure is destroyed, making the position untenable, the UAF retreat on their own. This way, Ukrainians continue taking large casualties, while the damage to infrastructure is localised and limited.

 
All that is fine. But you need numbers to make that happen. One of the objectives of MLRS is interdiction, but nothing much can be done without numbers.



We now know that the Russian casualties are so low because regular troops are barely even fighting in offensives. Most of the fighting is being done by militias and PMC. Only artillery is being used by regular troops, and of course some additional units to support some thrusts that require considerable vehicle-based firepower.

Ukr isn't "resisting", the front is moving slowly by design. The Russians are simply forcing the Ukrainians to protect terrain that cannot be protected without taking high casualties.

The Russian tactic is simple. Russia starts pounding a major Ukr position. And as Ukrainians die, more come in to reinforce, and this cycle repeats. After enough of the infrastructure is destroyed, making the position untenable, the UAF retreat on their own. This way, Ukrainians continue taking large casualties, while the damage to infrastructure is localised and limited.

The numbers are increasing constantly.

Garbage, garbage and garbage. Who are you trying to kid with 'Russian casualties are low'? The militias are negligible, they always were, 'militias/rebels/separatists' are broadly code for Russians.

The front is moving slowly because tanks are getting blown up and Russian logistics are being torn to pieces by strikes on ammo dumps, not to mention trainline sabotage.

The problem with that is that Ukrainian artillery can now outrange Russian artillery and it's vastly more accurate. Russia has lost ~1,100 pieces of artillery and MLRS, and lately it's been losing a lot of the things that go in them en masse too.

Russian losses are just as high as Ukrainian losses, some days higher. Notably Russia made several failed advances on 8th July and many ammo dumps were levelled. It lost 1200 men to death and injury and made zero gains. Since Ukraine withdrew from the pocket, Russia has made no advances and lost hundreds to death and injury every day, with crap blowing up behind their lines all over the place, explosions inside Russia, Russian rail lines exploding. 58 Russians killed at last 4 warehouse explosions alone.

Ukraine will continue fighting because it's their country. North Vietnam had half the population of Ukraine, suffered as many losses or more and still won. They won even though they were only able to inflict 1/15th of their losses on the US. By comparison Russia is getting its ars kicked, i.e. Russia is doing way worse than the US did in Vietnam, way, way worse, it will have exceed the US's entire Vietnam casualty figures by the end of October. And the scale of their equipment losses are something the US/NATO has never seen in any war. The US wasn't facing sanctions during the Vietnam War either, Russia is, that has a toll too. Russia can't sustain this for more than 3 years maximum. All Russia does by continuing in Ukraine is get closer to turning a military loss into complete self-destruction.
@Picdelamirand-oil @BMD

There you go. Western propaganda versus reality. Watch the video in the quote first.

Tank's smoking, damaged tracks, it will be abandoned and collected later as a trophy, like the other 4.
 
The numbers are increasing constantly.

Garbage, garbage and garbage. Who are you trying to kid with 'Russian casualties are low'? The militias are negligible, they always were, 'militias/rebels/separatists' are broadly code for Russians.

The front is moving slowly because tanks are getting blown up and Russian logistics are being torn to pieces by strikes on ammo dumps, not to mention trainline sabotage.

The problem with that is that Ukrainian artillery can now outrange Russian artillery and it's vastly more accurate. Russia has lost ~1,100 pieces of artillery and MLRS, and lately it's been losing a lot of the things that go in them en masse too.

Russian losses are just as high as Ukrainian losses, some days higher. Notably Russia made several failed advances on 8th July and many ammo dumps were levelled. It lost 1200 men to death and injury and made zero gains. Since Ukraine withdrew from the pocket, Russia has made no advances and lost hundreds to death and injury every day, with crap blowing up behind their lines all over the place, explosions inside Russia, Russian rail lines exploding. 58 Russians killed at last 4 warehouse explosions alone.

Ukraine will continue fighting because it's their country. North Vietnam had half the population of Ukraine, suffered as many losses or more and still won. They won even though they were only able to inflict 1/15th of their losses on the US. By comparison Russia is getting its ars kicked, i.e. Russia is doing way worse than the US did in Vietnam, way, way worse, it will have exceed the US's entire Vietnam casualty figures by the end of October. And the scale of their equipment losses are something the US/NATO has never seen in any war. The US wasn't facing sanctions during the Vietnam War either, Russia is, that has a toll too. Russia can't sustain this for more than 3 years maximum. All Russia does by continuing in Ukraine is get closer to turning a military loss into complete self-destruction.

Tank's smoking, damaged tracks, it will be abandoned and collected later as a trophy, like the other 4.

RAF KIA is less than 5000. DPR/LPR KIA is a little above that. Ukr KIA is 10 times those figures.
 
RAF KIA is less than 5000. DPR/LPR KIA is a little above that. Ukr KIA is 10 times those figures.
:ROFLMAO: :poop: There's no way to even square that number with this:


They lost damn near 5,000 multi-person vehicles (4678), never mind personnel, and Oryx have a backlog. These are fully-documented losses. The figures you believe are impossible.

Ukrainian losses by comparison:

 
:ROFLMAO: :poop: There's no way to even square that number with this:


They lost damn near 5,000 multi-person vehicles (4678), never mind personnel, and Oryx have a backlog. These are fully-documented losses. The figures you believe are impossible.

Ukrainian losses by comparison:


Oryx has started proving to be unreliable.

Now Oryx says 1233 vehicles destroyed, captured or abandoned until today. But let's see what the Ukrainians themselves have to say.

I’m just talking about heavy weapons. As of today, we have approximately 30 to 40, sometimes up to 50 percent of losses of equipment as a result of active combat. So, we have lost approximately 50 percent. … Approximately 1,300 infantry fighting vehicles have been lost, 400 tanks, 700 artillery systems.

And these numbers are as of a month ago. So 1233 by Orxy, but 2400 by the Ukrainians themselves, DESTROYED, not just abandoned or captured. And they are still lying about it. As per the Russians, Ukr's inventory is now almost entirely foreign. So that's over 6000 heavy weapons destroyed. A lot of the Oryx kills attributed to Russians are actually Ukrainian.

As I said before, most of the Ukr "kills" are merely isolated units killed in ones or twos, but Ukr is losing entire units at the brigade level. Many brigades have been pulled out with 80% losses. Hell, the Ukr general himself admits 50% losses, as of a month ago. That's 50% of their entire military.
 
The Ukrainian army began to create motorcycle ATGM crew units. Soldiers use the Metis 9K115 ATGM developed in 1978 with a range of one kilometer and move on Dnepr motorcycles




The moment of a Russian missile strike at a temporary deployment point for Ukrainian soldiers and foreign mercenaries in the city of Chasov Yar in Ukraine was caught on video. During the analysis of the rubble, the dead in military uniform were found.