Simply put, the EU is already sufficiently militarised compared to what Russia can do.This kinda circus only serves to do the opposite when there's enough leeway for other options.
Simply put, Russia can afford militarisation, the EU cannot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b092/5b092b5f006578c6f33941154a4b63fd815d2f4e" alt="Stick out tongue :p :p"
Simply put, the EU is already sufficiently militarised compared to what Russia can do.This kinda circus only serves to do the opposite when there's enough leeway for other options.
Simply put, Russia can afford militarisation, the EU cannot.
The time of your article is two weeks before Russia war against Ukraine, at this time the plan was to build 6 nuclear plants before 2050 with an option for 8 more after. Now it's 14 before 2050 and a plan to replace all our 54 nuclear plants.France's nuclear plans were ambitious even before the war. So Germany is just an excuse. This war has merely solidified existing French plans.
![]()
France to build up to 14 new nuclear reactors by 2050, says Macron
French president says ‘renaissance’ of atomic energy industry will help end country’s reliance on fossil fuelswww.theguardian.com
In any case, the sanctions were excessive, it should have been a lot more softer. The Russians will now simply cut production, artificially jack up prices and sell to others anyway, making a profit while still selling lesser than before. All this did is hurt the West's relations with the Third World, while also making the EU weaker in the process. Germany had decided to rework its plan as soon as Russia invaded, the sanctions don't help.
There aren't any other options, the pattern of Russian annexations and the invasion of Ukraine on the 24th indicates an intent to continue down this path. That must fail and sanctions must remain in place until it does.This kinda circus only serves to do the opposite when there's enough leeway for other options.
Simply put, Russia can afford militarisation, the EU cannot.
Because he's replacing the population after displacing it. Ethnic cleansing 101. His plan is to pay Russian dumbasses to settle there after the war.let me put in simple sentence that your half baked bum can understand, how will bombing the area that russia wants to keep force ukraine to the table? it has only helped ukraine's scorched earth policy.
You only find it baffling because you suffer from cognitive dissonance due to being terminally intoxicating with Russian narrative.Russian tactics in this war is absolutely baffling
This will finish off USD as a reserve currency.
Simply put, the EU is already sufficiently militarised compared to what Russia can do.![]()
The time of your article is two weeks before Russia war against Ukraine, at this time the plan was to build 6 nuclear plants before 2050 with an option for 8 more after. Now it's 14 before 2050 and a plan to replace all our 54 nuclear plants.
There aren't any other options, the pattern of Russian annexations and the invasion of Ukraine on the 24th indicates an intent to continue down this path. That must fail and sanctions must remain in place until it does.
This will finish off USD as a reserve currency.
The way they have seized Russian property and wealth, should we be worried? End of USD is good for us too. Do you think so?If the West steals Russian money, then the Russians will steal Western money exposed to the Russian market.
Petrodollar's end has already begun with the Russians, Saudis and Chinese.
The last time Russia tried to catch up with the West's military power, they bankrupted so bad the USSR dissolved.I doubt that. Maybe 10 years from now, alongside Russian modernisation.
No, the first domino was the Transnistria War.What's more accurate is Russia's future course of action was determined by the wholly avoidable Ukraine war. The Ukraine war has started this domino effect, the West has basically given Russia no choice by turning NATO into an existential threat.
Now, I don't think Georgia and Azerbaijan will survive as countries. In the meantime, the Baltics will see separatism, the same could happen in the Balkans.
The way they have seized Russian property and wealth, should we be worried? End of USD is good for us too. Do you think so?
The last time Russia tried to catch up with the West's military power, they bankrupted so bad the USSR dissolved.
What happened since is that the most productive parts of the Soviet Empire are part of the West now. So it's an even smaller and poorer Russia against an even bigger and stronger West.
No, the first domino was the Transnistria War.
And NATO is only an existential threat to Russia's ability to be an existential threat to their neighbor.
LOL don't be silly. Turkey will never let Azerbaijan lose, and Russia doesn't have the military power to oppose Turkey.
Anything funky in the Baltics will be squashed quickly, EU and NATO will no longer have any patience for "polite green men" and other Russian catspaws on their own territory. Maybe twenty years ago Russian separatists in the Baltics could have been seen as something to solve politically through some sort of compromise; but today it'll be seen as terrorism at best, and as direct Russian aggression at worst, so if they try anything, the only response will be hot lead injection in the head. There's really, really, really no patience at all for Russian shenanigans anymore.
The Balkans are where there's the most potential for trouble. However the fact that Slovenia, Croatia, Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia are in NATO now -- along with Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, and Italy -- means that their capacity to destabilize the area will be very limited. It's just Serbia, Bosnia-and-Herzegovina, and Kosovo that are not under the NATO umbrella. Serbia remembers, I think, what happens when NATO comes to deliver a curbstomp, I doubt they have much appetite for more. The worst we can expect, therefore, is from the ethnically Serbian areas of BiH (Republika Srpska) and Kosovo (North Kosovo), but all done in a plausibly-deniable way for Serbia itself, so it's doubtful it'll have the capacity to escalate past Western peacekeeping efforts.
Yeah, there was no need for Russia to start the war, or invade Crimea, that was completely avoidable. If it was smart it could have used Ukraine's EU-bound direction to work out a trade deal with the EU themselves that would have benefited the Russian economy. Now it's f*cked its economy for the foreseeable future through 8 years of bad decisions.What's more accurate is Russia's future course of action was determined by the wholly avoidable Ukraine war. The Ukraine war has started this domino effect, the West has basically given Russia no choice by turning NATO into an existential threat. Now, I don't think Georgia and Azerbaijan will survive as countries. In the meantime, the Baltics will see separatism, the same could happen in the Balkans.
It was ridiculous government that did the USSR in, and the same will happen again under Putin. When you make your country shit, people will just leave it.Oil prices crashed back then. Dutch disease did them in, not their military buildup, even if it did contribute in part to their demise.
But this time the situation is different due to the rise of the TW, which means Russia cannot be isolated like the SU was.
Only if you intend invading a neighbour.The way they have seized Russian property and wealth, should we be worried? End of USD is good for us too. Do you think so?
Russia is 140 million people, Europe (EU + EFTA + UK + Ukraine) is 570 million people. 650 million if you count Turkey in.What militarily separated the SU from the EU was the US. But the US is gonna become really busy elsewhere, so this time the EU is gonna be on its own for the most part.
This is the same calculus as "Russia will successfully invade Ukraine in three days, and the West will not dare interfere".I won't be surprised if the US throws the Baltics under the bus.
The US and EU will stop Turkey from interfering.
Yeah, that's what they keep doing. DARVO. But that doesn't make their bullshit true. It only makes those who believe Russia's bullshit morons.The Russians can throw that statement right back at you...
It's pretty funny you can think that foreign fighter and separatism is a bluff that won't be called.Separatism can function well under the NATO's red lines. Again, it doesn't have to be the Serbians themselves, there's plenty of foreign fighters.
Russia's economy is sooo bad that Pooty himself is saying it by allowing this to air on orc televisionYeah, there was no need for Russia to start the war, or invade Crimea, that was completely avoidable. If it was smart it could have used Ukraine's EU-bound direction to work out a trade deal with the EU themselves that would have benefited the Russian economy. Now it's f*cked its economy for the foreseeable future through 8 years of bad decisions.
NATO has never attacked Russian territory, so I don't know how it can be defined as an existential threat. The only threat the EU and NATO pose is in existing and making the Russian government look economically incompetent and socially retarded simply in doing so. That's basically what destroyed the USSR, our existence near them. So if that's what you mean by existential threat then yes I guess.
The Balkans is done. Russia had separatist games planned for the Baltics anyway, if it had been successful in this war. Now though, Russia will be too busy dying in Ukraine to bother the Baltics and Finland and Sweden have joined NATO, which has some irony, since it was marauding Swedish Vikings that made Russia in the first place.