I stopped reading here:![]()
What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma
KIEV (Reuters) - During his time on the board of one of Ukraine’s largest natural gas companies, Hunter Biden, the son of former U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden, was regarded as a helpful non-executive director with a powerful name, according to people familiar with Biden’s role at the company.www.reuters.com
Yeah, there was no need for Russia to start the war, or invade Crimea, that was completely avoidable. If it was smart it could have used Ukraine's EU-bound direction to work out a trade deal with the EU themselves that would have benefited the Russian economy. Now it's f*cked its economy for the foreseeable future through 8 years of bad decisions.
NATO has never attacked Russian territory, so I don't know how it can be defined as an existential threat. The only threat the EU and NATO pose is in existing and making the Russian government look economically incompetent and socially retarded simply in doing so. That's basically what destroyed the USSR, our existence near them. So if that's what you mean by existential threat then yes I guess.
The Balkans is done. Russia had separatist games planned for the Baltics anyway, if it had been successful in this war. Now though, Russia will be too busy dying in Ukraine to bother the Baltics and Finland and Sweden have joined NATO, which has some irony, since it was marauding Swedish Vikings that made Russia in the first place.
If Russia had began by negotiating continued access to Sevastopol if would have got it without any sanctions, and the EU would fully have supported them in that negotiation for the sake of keeping the peace. That was never the issue, don't kid yourself.Ukrainians were gonna cut the Russians off from their main base in the Black Sea at Sevastopol post the coup.
If NATO placed Pershing IIs or French S3 missiles in Sumy then it would be equivalent, otherwise it isn't. Not that Ukraine was particularly close to getting into NATO anyway, or the EU (which is what it was really about).Cuba didn't do anything to the US either, but we still got the Cuban missile crisis, along with attempts to invade Cuba unlawfully.
It always has everything to do with Russia. The Balkans is fine, its only problem was that it was polluted with rich Russian Tsarists fleeing the revolution in the early 1920s. And Russia is too busy dealing with Ukraine to pose problems elsewhere. In the Baltics Russian passports have been made invalid and procedures put in place for people to get new passports for the Baltic countries, so that there is no possibility of Russia trying to pull a Ukraine there.The Balkans still has problem areas, those regions will flare up as long as Russia actively deals with the Caucasus and the Baltics. It won't even have anything to do with Russia.
Russia is 140 million people, Europe (EU + EFTA + UK + Ukraine) is 570 million people. 650 million if you count Turkey in.
I think the main problem of Russia and Russia's stans is that they don't understand advanced mathematical notions such as addition.
This is the same calculus as "Russia will successfully invade Ukraine in three days, and the West will not dare interfere".
Yeah, that's what they keep doing. DARVO. But that doesn't make their bullshit true. It only makes those who believe Russia's bullshit morons.
"Boohoohoo, mean bad evil Poland joined NATO! Now poor oppressed little Russia cannot give mean bad evil Poland the friendly gift of surprise invasion anymore! Oh woe is poor little oppressed Russia! Boohoohoo, big bad evil Georgia and Ukraine want to join NATO! Now poor little downtrodden Russia needs to amicably invade these two countries and bring them the friendly gift of mass murder before it's too late!"
It's pretty funny you can think that foreign fighter and separatism is a bluff that won't be called.
In any case, these foreign fighters will have to be brought in. If you want to bring a significant number of people, it's going to be noticed. Now, just for fun, try to plot a course from Syria or whatever other Russian-controlled country to the Balkans without going through NATO-controlled space. For the Baltics, you could but you'll have to go through the Russian or Belorussian borders, and those are very closely watched.
If Russia had began by negotiating continued access to Sevastopol if would have got it without any sanctions, and the EU would fully have supported them in that negotiation for the sake of keeping the peace. That was never the issue, don't kid yourself.
If NATO placed Pershing IIs or French S3 missiles in Sumy then it would be equivalent, otherwise it isn't. Not that Ukraine was particularly close to getting into NATO anyway, or the EU (which is what it was really about).
It always has everything to do with Russia. The Balkans is fine, its only problem was that it was polluted with rich Russian Tsarists fleeing the revolution in the early 1920s. And Russia is too busy dealing with Ukraine to pose problems elsewhere. In the Baltics Russian passports have been made invalid and procedures put in place for people to get new passports for the Baltic countries, so that there is no possibility of Russia trying to pull a Ukraine there.
What would India do if Russia cut off their oil and weapons and together with China excluded them from BRICS BTW?
That was under the Yanukovych government, and failing to approve a deal once doesn't mean that it won't get approved eventually with a slight tweak to the terms. The EU would have made it happen for the sake of peace, believe me, they even largely overlooked Russia invading Crimea FFS and the Donbass. And it was Russia who removed Donbass from Ukraine's parliament by invading, making it impossible to hold acceptably monitored voting there - you've see what Russia's idea of a fair vote is.No, it was guaranteed to happen after the removal of Donbas from Ukraine's parliament.
How Likely Is the Cancellation of the Gas-for-Fleet Pact Between Ukraine and Russia?
By Maskym Bugriy On June 19, the Ukrainian parliament (Rada) failed to approve a draft law on the denunciation (abrogation) of the “Kharkiv Accord,” which President Viktor Yanukovych’s government signed with Russia in April 2010. The Kharkiv Accord allowed for the continuation of the stationing...jamestown.org
What is? The missile I mentioned no longer even exist. The only missiles in Poland are SM-3s, which are defensive weapons.They are already in Poland.
It already has told, Serbia is trying to join the EU like the Baltics. And if Russia tries anything in the Baltics it will be in a hot war with NATO from day 1. Putin won't have to complain about NATO support because he will be getting 1,000 cruise missiles per day until he either desists or is desisted. We won't even try negotiate with him in such a situation, we will actively attempt kill him wherever he pops his head up.Time will tell.
Your view is flawed, you could make assumptions like that in nearly all cases, but that wasn't my question. What would you do if they did?Why would Russia do that? Especially with a country they see as a potential new enemy.
They can keep China in check with their energy supplies and nuclear arsenal. You are surplus to requirements.Russia will use their relations with India to keep a check on China. This is how weaker powers use relations with others to balance relations with stronger powers.