I suppose now you know who gets thrown out![]()
Even a person with Undiagnosed/Untreated paranoia/Schizophrenia isn't going to believe these predictions.Dmitry Medvedev has published a list of his predictions for 2023.
![]()
You wouldn't need nukes to attack those. And no, the launchers in Poland can only carry air defence missiles. And even after withdrawing from the INF, the US has no plans to introduce nuclear warheads to MRBMs or IRBMs, plus Russia could counter that by placing similar nukes in Kaliningrad anyway, so it would be a fools game with no net gain. And the idea of NATO attacking Russian territory even with conventional weapons under normal conditions is ridiculous, they're not even doing it now, when they have the world's greatest excuse for doing it.
No it didn't, Jihadism dates back centuries (before the CIA was even founded) and Iran conducted the first Islamic suicide bombing in Lebanon.
Cast iron hard fact. Note the supporters column:
![]()
Chinese Communist Revolution - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Nobody was even interested in Communism until after the Soviet uprising in Russia, let alone being a Communist dictatorship.
Why doesn't India transition faster? I can't see why China should be the first. And India is going the nuclear route instead of gas for electricity generation. And I imagine India needs central heating less than China, assuming it even needs it at all.
Assumptions, meanwhile the Chinese economy is already there and consuming, whereas you are a 'what if' and sometimes what ifs never materialise.
Conventionally China is already more than a match, don't know how you can't see that, just as NATO is. But the threat of nuclear destruction still prevents direct engagement, let alone an invasion which would almost certainly lead to the use of nukes, after all, it's what WMDs are there to stop.
Skewed sex ratio? Nope. This isn't China or India.
Countries by sex ratio 2024 - StatisticsTimes.com
list of countries/territories by sex ratio based on the projections by United Nations. Sex ratio by world bank. Data tables and maps.statisticstimes.com
As for aging population, sure, but the demographic outlook is worse for Russia than for Europe because, surprise surprise, it turns out Europe attracts people a lot more than Russia does.
There's a lot of money that can be taken from wealthy westerners. Just a clampdown on the thousands of tax evasion schemes would bring an immediate boost. Good thing that the UK has left so that there's no one in the EU anymore to veto things in the name of Bahamas, Gibraltar, and the Cayman Islands anymore! Still need to strongarm Ireland and the Netherlands, of course, but that will be easier.
On the other hand, Russian oligarch wealth? Why, it's already been taken away! But no by Russia. By the West.
And why would that particularly benefit Russia?
I see US, EU, China of course, Japan too... I know there are also big names in Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but as for Russia? What do they have?![]()
Top 20 Largest Construction Companies in The World
The world's largest construction companies are known for their exceptional work on large scale projects. Here are the 20 of the biggest firmsonebasemedia.co.uk
Fun fact: the famous Kerch Bridge? It was built by a Dutch company. Not a Russian one. Russia didn't have a construction company that could handle a project of this size.
Yes of course, it's Boris Johnson who told the Russian tank crews to pack their dress uniform as they rolled towards Kyiv on February 24...
There is a fundamental disconnect if you think such a treaty could exist. Western view is that, in accordance to the UN charter, each sovereign country is free to choose its own defensive alliances (article 51, "inherent right of individual or collective self-defence"). So it's up to Poland, Ukraine, and so on if they want to become buffer states by treaty. Do you believe they would?
Plus, at some point you'll have to open your eyes and realize that it was never about buffer states. It was always, purely and solely, about rebuilding the Russian empire. What NATO expansion means is that any country that joins NATO cannot be reclaimed for the greater glory of the Russian empire, this is the only reason why Russia whines about NATO expansion.
Okay, you don't get it.
If the Pachtun Front For Liberation of Russian Latvia suddenly appears, nobody is going to be "oh sure, the historic Pachtun population of Latvia has always allied with the Russians, they've always been there, yes yes yes". Nobody is going to care whether they can be traced to Russia or not. It'll just be the proof that we're facing a foreign-backed terrorist plot, and not anything that could potentially be considered a legitimate revendication of the people who live there because they were born there.
If Russia takes over Ukraine, they'll mostly be in Russia. And they'll blame Russia. Those in Europe will probably just support those in Russia, providing them with funds and equipment to commit terror attacks in Russia. Remember that the last time Russia had annexed Ukraine, it took them decades to eradicate all the Ukrainian resistance cells. Same thing will happen again.
Besides, Neo-Nazis are like 10% of the Russian population, compared to less than 2% for Ukraine. It'll be easy for Ukrainian neo-Nazis to find help from Russian neo-Nazis; if you remember that the entire Azov Battalion thing was originally created by Russian neo-Nazis, not Ukrainian ones.
No. They had no reason to do that before Russia started their proxy war against Russia using Russian secret service operatives and a select number of Ukrainian criminals that the Russian troops had busted out of prison.
But now they definitely are, if they can reclaim Crimea. This is what is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. Russia thought they needed to attack Ukraine because Ukraine may become hostile to them, to the surprise of the Russian intelligentsia, it is the Russian attack that is turning Ukraine hostile to them.
If anyone says that Ukraine would have started trouble against Russia if Russia hadn't attacked first, then they are complete stupid morons absolutely out of touch with reality. Ukraine couldn't afford to take that risk, and we see the reason why.
But now? Now Ukraine has got nothing more to lose. So Russia shoot itself in the foot. They gave Ukraine a good reason to reclaim Sevastopol, and removed their reason not to do it. Congrats to genius 17-dimensional chess player Putin the Great.
The Baltics are safe and peaceful because they're integrated in the EU and NATO. If Russia tries to "actively deal" with them, Russia will cease to exist as a nation-state.
The Caucasus sucks and is in a state of constant warfare because it's integrated in Russian power structure like the CSTO and the Eurasian Economic Union. Such is life in Russian satellites. And you people don't get why Eastern European countries want to leave Russia's orbit forever...
For the sillies who think Russia will be their ally against China:
For the sillies who think Russia values and respects India and would not commit their shenanigans on Indian soil:
For the sillies who think Central Asia is still aligned with Russia:
For the sillies who think Russia's industrial capacity is up to the task:
Dmitry Medvedev has published a list of his predictions for 2023.
![]()
Russia paying for drones in Su-35s.
once sanctions are imposed, ppl will revolt and throw out putin, I suppose now you know who gets thrown out![]()
I'm not surprised that you'd be so happy and cheerful after seeing an old woman get brutalized by a mob. This is the kind of attitude that inevitably goes with being a Putin supporter.
You should read up on what happened before the Russian invasion. Zelensky was preparing to attack Donbas.
Russian invasion did not start in 2022. It's the Kremlin that decided to start a proxy war in Ukraine and anschluss Crimea with a phony referendum.This war was planned, but not in the Kremlin.
Nope. They thought it'd be a one-sided war where the Ukrainians would let themselves be shot or captured without retaliation. If they thought there wouldn't be a war, they wouldn't have started with a massive volley of missile strikes on Ukrainian military facilities. Unfortunately for them, they used largely outdated intelligence so about 60% of their missiles hit irrelevant targets -- emptied base, decommissioned aircraft, etc. That Ukrainian air defenses had largely resisted and were still active has crippled Russian air support.Can we at least agree that Russia went into Ukraine thinking there won't be a war?
We know for sure it's the case because the Russians went to Kiev without air defences and infantry.
Russian military presence in the region is dwindling rapidly, and especially its military presence. Central Asia is stuck between three regional powers, Russia, China, and Turkey. Russia used to be first place, now it's in third place. China is in first place and will make sure Russia does not come back.Why would anyone think that? But CAR is stuck. Whatever hissy fits they wanna throw, the fact is Russian presence is very strong in the region, even military presence.
OK! what are other options in Foreseeable future? EU and China. EU is onboard with US, That left china.Russian oligarch wealth is yet to be drilled out. Stealing Russian wealth in possession of the West will weaken the West in the long term due to the distrust it will create in the international market.
Taking back laundered money is a one-time thing.
Yup! Agree on this.Resources. Not their construction tech, but the stuff underground. India needs Russia's vast natural resources, and not just oil and gas.
![]()
10 Countries With the Most Natural Resources
Commodities are the raw materials used for products manufactured worldwide. This article lists the top 10 countries with the most value in natural resources.www.investopedia.com
You can see that while Russia sits on top, India isn't even in the top 10.
YUP! agree here too.Can we at least agree that Russia went into Ukraine thinking there won't be a war?
We know for sure it's the case because the Russians went to Kiev without air defences and infantry.
RFF killing civilians in Donbass and all over Ukraine is okay because there's civilian casualties from the fire exchage between FSB "separatists" and Ukrainian forces?Ah, the holier than thou attitude. UAF killing civilians in Donbas is okay. And a dumb Russian supporting that should be protected. That guy probably did that woman a favour before someone hit her. People need to learn how to read the room, especially when life can be at risk.
The average Russian supports the war because the Ukrainians are killing Russian civilians with artillery.
It's a delusional list . Even 1 doesn't seem realistic.For 2023, only 1 is realistic. Quite an entertaining list though.
What Do you mean?Militarisation of Iran was bound to happen.
La Russie se dit prête à augmenter ses livraisons de gaz à l'Europe
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Russia says it is ready to increase gas supplies to Europe
Russia's deputy prime minister has opened the door to a return of supplies to Poland and Germany via the Yamal pipeline. But this is unlikely to happen: Europe has found other sources... including Russian liquefied natural gas.
One step forward, one step back... Russia is currently sending contradictory signals. After threatening to cut its oil production in protest against the European embargo on crude and the price cap, Moscow says it is ready to resume gas deliveries via the Yamal pipeline. "The European market remains relevant because the gas shortage persists and we have the opportunity to resume supplies," the deputy prime minister in charge of energy, Alexander Novak, told the official news agency Tass.
He said the Yamal pipeline, which links Russia to Poland and Germany, had been stopped for "political reasons". Shortly after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, as supplies to Europe began to dwindle, Gazprom stopped its deliveries via Yamal. Then the Russian company demanded that Poland pay in roubles. Warsaw refused and the Polish government terminated its contract with Gazprom.
View attachment 25776
Investment in LNG
At the end of August, the pipeline was shut down for three days of maintenance, but has not been reactivated since. The flows were then reversed to allow Poland to be supplied from Germany.
These statements could indicate that the various measures taken against Russia and its hydrocarbon production are beginning to dry up its economy. So far, Moscow has been able to rely on the liquefied natural gas (LNG) market to keep its exports high. The more flexible transport of this energy by ship allows the country to diversify its customers. European imports of Russian LNG are said to have increased by 40% this year.
Russia has developed an ambitious programme to increase its liquefaction capacity. By 2035, it hopes to be able to export 80 to 140 million tonnes per year, up from 35 million tonnes today. Novatek still hopes to restart the Arctic LNG 2 project, in which TotalEnergies has invested but which has been at a standstill since the Western sanctions, by the end of 2023. A large part of Russian production could therefore now be liquefied and then shipped to international markets.
Stocks are rising in Europe
The future of gas pipelines is more uncertain. To resume deliveries to Poland, Moscow will first have to ease its own sanctions against Warsaw. And on the Polish side, there is nothing to suggest that they are ready to start buying from Russia again, even though they have largely diversified their sources this year.
In Europe, the pressure has eased in recent weeks as temperatures have risen. Stocks have not really been dented despite the first cold snap in December. They have even started to be filled again and now stand at an average of 83%. Germany, which had fallen to a filling rate of 87%, has risen to 88% in the last few days (compared to 77% at the same time last year), while Poland has a record rate of 96%, putting it in a strong position.
There are no plans to put nukes in such missile though, and if there were they could do it from the Baltics, or from Finland right now without Ukraine anyway. None of these theories hold.The Russian ground forces are not like the SU's. And tac nukes have the ability to get into missile designs capable of getting through Russian IADS, since few numbers are required compared to conventional munitions.
Islamic fundamentalism started centuries ago and never ended. Iran was funding suicide bombers against Israel before the Afghan War started. And Russia caused the problems in Afghanistan by overthrowing the king by proxy in 1973. India and the USSR both recognised the new illegitimate government just 2 days after the coup! So you need to start accepting some responsibility yourselves for how Afghanistan turned out, it was a nice, civilised country until 1973, you and Russia ruined it.Modern day Islamic fundamentalism dates back to the CIA's war against the SU in Afghanistan. Look up all the major terrorist organisations and when they started, that will give you the clue necessary to piece the puzzle.
Go to China and say that. LOL, that's a good one.Mao's China was sh!t. Today's China was created by the West after 1974.
Always an excuse. You were useless, that's why China shot ahead. Just imagine where you'd be if you'd allied with NATO from the start. Ask yourself that question honestly.India's transition is happening really fast, extremely fast for a $2500 economy. But China has a headstart, it's simply the nature of things. What China will do by 2030, we may need up to 2035-40. So, Russia will find India to be more important than China. Another problem is India lacks oil reserves entirely, our best is 1 million bpd, whereas China's local reserves give them 5 million a day.
Don't do it, go EV, hydrogen is ridiculously inefficient over the full cycle by comparison.India is going the hydrogen route.
Figured, so China will use more gas.India needs central cooling. Our local temps go up to 47deg C. Even Bangalore is considered cool at 37deg C, even if I personally disagree. While we do not need gas, we need electricity. Our summer electricity bills are much higher than winter bills.
Lots of people in China don't have a car yet.China's oil consumption has likely already peaked and will more than likely go into decline. China's future need is gas, not oil.
Russia will get weaker due to the war, war never makes any of its participants stronger, it impoverishes and weakens.China today is conventionally stronger than Russia. But against Russia in 10 years, China won't be its conventional match. NATO minus US will not be able to match the Russians either.
All three have different priorities. The Russians are ground forces heavy, whereas China wants to develop its navy and air force to challenge the US instead. The EU needs to raise a proper army as well. And in the meantime, there will be quite a bit of technological mismatch. The EU's next gen tech is only gonna arrive after 2040 versus 2025 for the Russians. So the Russians will have a significant tech lead in ground forces versus both the EU and China in 10 years.
That's simply not the case. China has 1.3bn people and a border with Russia, and a large economy. Saying Russia needs India more, is like Britain saying that Turkey is more important than the EU going forward. No offence to Turkey of course, but facts are facts.But I'm not referring to the military, it's not as relevant, economics is more important. For at least this decade, China needs Russia more than Russia needs China. And India needs Russia for a decade longer. So, in the long run, Russia will give India greater importance, because Russia will need India once China no longer finds Russia economically useful. Plus, in the long run, both India and Russia need each other to counter China, the same as it was during the Cold War.
After 1971 war, India had no choice but to support USSR antics, Whether it was legal/moral or not.India and the USSR both recognised the new illegitimate government just 2 days after the coup! So you need to start accepting some responsibility yourselves for how Afghanistan turned out, it was a nice, civilised country until 1973,
Nope. India just voted. That's it. India didn't ruined anything in Afghanistan.you and Russia ruined it.
Well, I think that's probably what Nixon and Kissinger thought in 1971 too. It's interesting though that Indians intervention to prevent a genocide in East Pakistan in 1971 but often castigate NATO for doing the same in Serbia in 1999.After 1971 war, India had no choice but to support USSR antics, Whether it was legal/moral or not.
To have accepted it so fast afterwards, like the Soviets, India must have been in on it. You have to admit it smells, and you would accuse us if it was the other way round.Nope. India just voted. That's it. India didn't ruined anything in Afghanistan.