If you were targeting a Patriot battery, you would target the radar because it's the most expensive piece, probably the most fragile, and destroying it puts the battery out of commission.
They've lost more ground on the Western flank though. Captured a pile of rubble just in time to get encircled in summer when all the tanks run over them.
I need this kind of delusional confidence in my life.
How many missiles though? For 8 launchers of the standard PAC-3 (non-MSE), 128 missiles would cost 128 x $3m = $384m, MSE cost might give $560m.
Oh sure, a 4.3 ton ballistic missile with a manoeuvrable RV and a radar in the nose, plus electronic decoys is only $1m.
Do you even believe the things you say? <-Serious question.
next time you post think logically instead of allowing your hate to cloud your judgement.
terrorist organization will not disappear but it will embolden other cntries to stand up against the mob. Assad is back in arab league, iran & saudis are teeing off, its only in asia they are still able to play the games all due to chinese thugs.
Are you talking to me or yourself?
All I can tell you is that when Ukraine have destroyed stuff on Russian bases, NATO has provided satellite imagery. Regardless of whether they were moved, before and after shots of the site should be possible.
western weapons are now becoming more of a cost burden to operate, imagine the cost if it was a iranian drone that had hit instead of kinzhal.
You mean like Finland and Sweden joining NATO?
So you're saying that if the S-400 can shoot down a 50 year-old fighter it's good?
It's not European countries who exceeded their entire target budget deficit for 2023 in the first quarter.
