most of them are from private companies like maxar.All I can tell you is that when Ukraine have destroyed stuff on Russian bases, NATO has provided satellite imagery. Regardless of whether they were moved, before and after shots of the site should be possible.
no one will explicitly disclose their capability. A good example is SAR imagery.It's not exactly a secret that Russia has military satellites capable of capturing imagery mate.
Now with Bakhmut fully under Russian control, the end has just begun for NATO...
Also I'm waiting for US to approve F-16 sales/supply to Ukraine. They would prove nice cannon-fodder to Su-30SM/35S/57. LOL.
Oh sure, a 4.3 ton ballistic missile with a manoeuvrable RV and a radar in the nose, plus electronic decoys is only $1m. Do you even believe the things you say? <-Serious question.
I think now the goal is do drag the conflict and make it a big money pit for nato. Russia will use wagner & allied groups to grind the ukraine and ukraine will keep asking for support from west.Nah. As per Prigozhin, Donbas will take a minimum of 1.5 years and all the territories east of the Dnieper will take 3 years. Must be underpromising, but any conclusion is years away.
For the end to just begin, the Russians have to take the 3rd line, Slovyansk to Kostiantynivka, marked in red.
View attachment 27829
Right now, after Bakhmut (1), the next target will be Chasiv Yar (2). Post that, until the 3rd line, the red line, everything is just flat lands, which will allow the Russians to directly threaten Kostiantynivka. Next would be Pokrovsk (4). Once 4 falls, Donbas can be conisdered captured.
Of course, in order to capture the cities along the red line, the Russians will also have to start a new offensive in the Lyman and Siversk regions, which are in the northeast and east resply of Slovyansk.
Also, the one city on the top left corner of the map called Barvinkove also needs to be captured, it's a rail line that can supply to Slovyansk.
For any decisive victory, it's a long road ahead.
In any case, the Russians are not prioritising taking land, they are focused on killing the UAF.
They will just use it differently, without exposing themselves in a head-on collision with the Russians. So low altitude support and interdiction missions and standoff strike.
Wagner has fulfilled its contract and is quickly pulling out/getting the hell out of Bakhmut because they know what is coming.I think now the goal is do drag the conflict and make it a big money pit for nato. Russia will use wagner & allied groups to grind the ukraine and ukraine will keep asking for support from west.
So where are Russia's shots of the damage to the Patriots.most of them are from private companies like maxar.
Right, so now you're arguing that a simple image from a satellite is too top secret for Russia to disclose, but they're happy for the innards of all their missiles to be discovered and analysed. Why are there no shots from private companies even?no one will explicitly disclose their capability. A good example is SAR imagery.
Don't change what he said. He said 6 months for Donetsk and Luhansk and 1.5-2 years for everything east of the Dnieper, i.e. Zaporizhzhia and Kherson too. Instead Bakhmut took 6 months.Nah. As per Prigozhin, Donbas will take a minimum of 1.5 years
All your assertions are nonsense. Iskander-M costs $3m, and is a single piece missile, Kinzhal is far more complicated, the RV separates and there's a radar in the nose. Not to mention that they had to turn an interceptor into a non-interceptor that can only carry Kinzhals just to use it, which has a separate, yet absolutely necessary cost associated with it too that isn't even included in the Kinzhal's $10m price tag. As for Kalibr's, India must have got ripped off then. You won't find your figures quoted anywhere.What's so surprising about that? The Iskander-M costs $800,000. The Kinzhal is just a modified Iskander M. The Kaliber is more sophisticated and costs $1M. Tomahawk costs $2M. The Kinzhal has always been hypersonic on the cheap.
It's Russia that's exceeded their target budget deficit for the whole of 2023 in Q1.I think now the goal is do drag the conflict and make it a big money pit for nato. Russia will use wagner & allied groups to grind the ukraine and ukraine will keep asking for support from west.
Correction of part in bold.So where are Russia's shots of the damage to the Patriots.
Right, so now you're arguing that a simple image from a satellite is too top secret for Russia to disclose, but they're happy for the innards of all their missiles to be discovered and analysed. Why are there no shots from private companies even?
The simplest answer is usually correct, i.e. there was no destruction of a battery by Kinzhals.
As regards Kinzhals costing $1m, who the hell are you kidding? Not even yourselves I would bet.
You mean like Finland and Sweden joining NATO?
Don't change what he said. He said 6 months for Donetsk and Luhansk and 1.5-2 years for everything east of the Dnieper, i.e. Zaporizhzhia and Kherson too. Instead Bakhmut took 6 months.
All your assertions are nonsense. Iskander-M costs $3m, and is a single piece missile, Kinzhal is far more complicated, the RV separates and there's a radar in the nose. Not to mention that they had to turn an interceptor into a non-interceptor that can only carry Kinzhals just to use it, which has a separate, yet absolutely necessary cost associated with it too that isn't even included in the Kinzhal's $10m price tag. As for Kalibr's, India must have got ripped off then. You won't find your figures quoted anywhere.
It's Russia that's exceeded their target budget deficit for the whole of 2023 in Q1.
I think now the goal is do drag the conflict and make it a big money pit for nato. Russia will use wagner & allied groups to grind the ukraine and ukraine will keep asking for support from west.
Wagner has fulfilled its contract and is quickly pulling out/getting the hell out of Bakhmut because they know what is coming.