Ukraine - Russia Conflict

Yakymivsyky district: In the area of Peremozhne and Annovka villages, the occupying forces blew up chain of ponds, having previously filled them with water to the maximum. The road to Kherson, fields with plantations are completely flooded.​



1686078510092.png
 
Russian base was hit in Novooleksiivka of Kherson region this morning.


1686078812199.png
 
Before and after images:

1.jpg


2.jpg

Obviously, the Ukrainian side being on the high ground is not flooded. Of course, the Russians blew up the dam to flood themselves and cut off water supply to Crimea and make the nuclear power plant vulnerable to attacks and accidents.

And of course, Ukraine has opened up the dams they control so the water reaches the high ground and buries them too.

Sheeple logic remains undefeated.

With that said, Russia needs to stop half-arsing the war. Said this right at the beginning, the more time it takes, the worse it gets for Russia and the world. The losses they take within a shorter period of time will still be less than if they prolong it for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RASALGHUL
3.png

So Russian fortifications along the bank are gone.

Now Ukraine only has to wait for water to recede before embarking on an offensive from that direction. But that could still give the Russians some time to fortify on higher ground.
 
Zoomed in:
4.png

So the entire defence line downstream is gone. The remaining fortifications are not enough to stop an offensive, the trenches are more like small checkpoints.
 
Zapo.png

UAF cannot get through all that to reach Crimea or break the land bridge, so it makes sense to flood the river and try from across the river.
 
Lol. Russians have been in control of dam you have any idea how much boom it takes to breach it? Just look at the first boom Russians used at the dam a year ago... it didn't breach.

A lot of amphibious equipment was transferred to the Ukrainians by NATO for an amphibious invasion. Undersea explosions are not difficult when you're on the other side of the river.

Anyway, the loss of the dam is way too big for the Russians to have done it, it supplies 85% of Crimea's water. And if they wanted to flood their own defences, all they had to do was open the floodgates, would have done the same thing at the flick of a switch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RASALGHUL
Yeah, looks like Ukraine went all the way over to right next to the Russian side to do it huh?


View attachment 28108
I m having a working brain, i have my reasons to beleive that its not Russian act.
A lot of amphibious equipment was transferred to the Ukrainians by NATO for an amphibious invasion. Undersea explosions are not difficult when you're on the other side of the river.

Anyway, the loss of the dam is way too big for the Russians to have done it, it supplies 85% of Crimea's water. And if they wanted to flood their own defences, all they had to do was open the floodgates, would have done the same thing at the flick of a switch.
Exactly.
@Rajput Lion shows how mediocre & unprofessional is Russian military. They let enemies to blown up the Dam. Can expect same level of incompetency in the weapon they developed too.
 
I m having a working brain, i have my reasons to beleive that its not Russian act.
It leaves all Ukrainian areas north of the dam short of water. The dammed-up water was used to supply reservoirs. Whilst the canal supplying Crimea was north of the dam, Crimea itself is south of the dam and they can tap the water from further downstream.

The Russians also blew up ponds storing water in Yakymivsyky district.

 
A lot of amphibious equipment was transferred to the Ukrainians by NATO for an amphibious invasion. Undersea explosions are not difficult when you're on the other side of the river.

Anyway, the loss of the dam is way too big for the Russians to have done it, it supplies 85% of Crimea's water. And if they wanted to flood their own defences, all they had to do was open the floodgates, would have done the same thing at the flick of a switch.
Oh and the Russians aren't monitoring that? They just let Ukrainians move maybe 5t of explosives underwater to the dam right next to the turbine hall that they control?
View attachment 28116

UAF cannot get through all that to reach Crimea or break the land bridge, so it makes sense to flood the river and try from across the river.
Whilst amphibious vehicles can cross water they are still better on land, a shorter crossing would have been more advantageous and would also have allowed for pontoon bridging to move heavy tanks in later on.

Russian fortifications in Belgorod didn't perform to well.