Ukraine - Russia Conflict
- Thread starter randomradio
- Start date
Are you saying that Russia still has some secret weapons and is unwilling to use them on the battlefield?
SEAD/DEAD requires showing off some capabilities that are not easily replaced, particularly in the EM spectrum. PAF suffered with the same problem after Balakot strikes, they are now in the process of buying new EW equipment that was compromised in 2019. It takes roughly 5-10 years to fully replace compromised systems.
Then there's also special formations and flying tactics. They haven't used attack helicopters for the SEAD mission as well.
Overall, they have only used less reliable standoff attacks against SAM targets.
Nope, they've recaptured several settlements if you follow the posts, breaching the 2nd line of defence in places. The sort of progress that took Russia weeks to achieve at Bakhmut.
You can, if you want to run that cable all the way to the far bank.
Ever heard of Occam's Razor? Occam's Razor says that Russia did it.
Yeah, sure, Russia is seeing tens of thousands of it's troops die and spending billions instead of using its best SEAD/EW capability?
Another Russian freight train derailed.
Freight train derailed at Alekseevka district of Belgorod region Belgorod - Ukraine Interactive map - Ukraine Latest news on live map - liveuamap.com
Freight train derailed at Alekseevka district of Belgorod region. Live Universal Awareness Map Liveuamap is a leading independent global news and information site dedicated to factual reporting of a variety of important topics including conflicts, human rights issues, protests, terrorism...
liveuamap.com
Интерфакс
⚡️В Белгородской области 15 грузовых вагонов сошли с рельсов "ЧП в Алексеевском городском округе. Рядом с железнодорожной станцией с рельсов сошли 15 грузовых вагонов локомотива. По предварительным данным, пострадавших нет", - сообщил глава региона Вячеслав Гладков. @interfaxonline
t.me
That's to China's benefit. A cold war is associated with the rise of a competing power. This war benefits the US, the most followed by China.
China has the same access to Russia's resources as India does. And the de-dollarisation process gives the greatest importance to CNY. And while Europe has become more dependent on the US, Russia's become more dependent on China. And India is too poor to balance US and China for both Europe and Russia.
It's just temporary, and it's not a lot of money yet.
Should have bought a few hundred mine ploughs with each tank.
US > China. All others are losers. Cheaper resources for India is just a consolation price.
What was in India's interests is stronger relations between Europe and Russia. The opposite hurts us a lot, because now Russia has to deal with 3 military competitors now, tying their hands when it comes to India.
Lol, you yourself keep claiming China will force Russia to shut off the tap to India.
3 vehicles and 500 casualties...
Look up the fortifications map. They haven't even crossed the line of contact yet.
And they also destroyed their own defences and killed their own troops and shut off water supply to their own province and destroyed their biggest foothold in the region in the process? And what do the Russians gain, UAF lines still remain intact, no one died on the Ukrainian side and Ukraine gets shallower water to attack from? How does this go again? Occam's Razor, eh?
They don't need SEAD/DEAD when they already have air superiority over the battlefront.
The blue line in the 3rd image is the first line of contact.
They have dude, even the 2nd line in one place.
You can't attack across a wide silt bed regardless of whether there's water on it. Occam's Razor says the simplest explanation is right. Russian was in control of the dam, only it had access, it was easiest for it to blow the dam. It did it to divert Ukrainian resources at the moment the counter-offensive began. Your shallower water argument would require an actual assault from that direction to back it up, there is none, therefore you are unequivocally wrong.
How come they've lost so many aircraft then? Why are they using expensive cruise missiles to attack Ukrainian cities instead of bombs. They only have air parity over the battlefront, they poke a bit and the run.
Nope, the entire red area was Russian controlled territory.
Last edited:
Cheaper resources and massive oil laundering payoff.
But you hate Europe and the West anyway, so why would you care about that?
They will when it comes to conflict, in the mean time you get to profit.
Likely a translation balls-up.3 vehicles and 500 casualties...
Did Pakistan lose ECM facilities in 2019? India just hit some houses on the border, standoff weapons will be the primary means of future major SEAD missions, like the AGM 88G increasing its range or using cruise missiles to stay empty for long periods time
If you want any relations between Europe and Russia you need the Russian military out of Ukraine, because there will never be any relations whilst it's there.