I really admire these Pakistanis. They shamelessly speak lies after lies with a straight face. This kind of ability can't be acuired, it has to be in genes of a person.This was the real killer.
I really admire these Pakistanis. They shamelessly speak lies after lies with a straight face. This kind of ability can't be acuired, it has to be in genes of a person.This was the real killer.
Group Captain MJA Vinod VSM (retd) (@MjaVinod) Tweeted:
Refer @joe_sameer 's article
Skeletons are tumbling from #Pakistan 's cupboard Ninjamonkey on Twitter ( )
Sir, let's keep up all the argument aside now only one question...If they had the evidence of a claim kill of Su30,why didn't they provide it to the front of the entire world..Sir, I'm not sure who told you this, but the only "taqiyya" I'm familiar with is the pillow I sleep on every night.
Sir, thank you for your compliment.
Sir, please calm down. I personally don't believe that those radar snapshots were ridiculous. Let me rephrase: After dismissing those images, PAF had no moral standing to share its own as credible evidence.
Sir, please read my previous reply again. PAF's claimed kill (large RCS target/Su-30, deep inside IOK) and IAF's claimed kill (F-16, over AJK) are two different claimed kills, separated in time and space. I'm not sure why PAF would award its pilot for a kill claimed by IAF.
Sir, I would try to explain the difference between confirmed kill in air combat, and something confirmed to Alan Warnes personally...but I don't think it will be of any use. As stated before, PA spokesperson issued the "no F-16s used" statement because PA was not fully aware of the T&Cs of PAF's F-16s.
Sir, the problem is that you gentlemen believe the F-16 arguments (tadpoles, puffs) of the same media (analysts). Anyways, since everything is a figment of my imagination, relax and amuse yourself with my creative imagination. As others have noted, there is no point in discussing this over and over again unless some new evidence pops up. You know, something like a new-uddin, 606 or an engine cowling.
Sir, @The Deterrent F16 'B' still a typo after these pictures?Why is Pakistan trying to pass off tail number 606 F16 as single seater while it's twin seater with multiple pics on internet?
Pakistan army is involved in everything from real estate to selling cornflakes but they dont know the T/Cs of F16 lol and i thought ISPR is PR officer of all 3 forces so why didnt he consult first , what a joke , lies + to hide tha lie lie + .........This was the real killer.
Dont u see Endia , thats photoshop , Kafir liersSir, @The Deterrent F16 'B' still a typo after these pictures?
Sir, I'm glad to be of service in providing you with amusement.This was the real killer.
Sir, I assure you, the 1st world doesn't gives a rat's behind about the kill-claims of the South-Asian rivals. Besides, unlike a very professional air-force, PAF doesn't feel the need to go out of its way to prove anything.Sir, let's keep up all the argument aside now only one question...If they had the evidence of a claim kill of Su30,why didn't they provide it to the front of the entire world..
Your opinion:We would ridicule...
The evidence is not for to please some internet warrior in India but for the entire world military to analyze that...
Sir, I urge you to read my replies carefully. I'm not sure what 606's photos prove, besides what we already know that it is a B-version.Sir, @The Deterrent F16 'B' still a typo after these pictures?
Thats according to your narrative but according to us , we have scored a kill , first F16 kill for a Mig21. Both sides know the truth, the world knows who has a better credibility based on each others history of speaking truth and lies. Its futile excercise to debate anything else on this. Truth will prevail one day.Sir, I'm glad to be of service in providing you with amusement.
However I am yet to reach the level of the 4th-largest air force in the world, who with 350+ 4th-gen aircrafts at its disposal, waves around a piece of a missile complaining about the use of a 4th-gen aircraft by its adversary, regretting that it didn't have 36 more 4.5-gen aircrafts.
Sir, I assure you, the 1st world doesn't gives a rat's behind about the kill-claims of the South-Asian rivals. Besides, unlike a very professional air-force, PAF doesn't feel the need to go out of its way to prove anything.
Sir, I urge you to read my replies carefully. I'm not sure what 606's photos prove, besides what we already know that it is a B-version.
Let me rephrase: I believe that KT made a typo when he recreated the honor roll to include the awards for the respective pilots. 606, an F-16B, piloted by S/L Hassan, launched the AIM-120 that made its mark. The entire PAF F-16 fleet had the same aircrafts and fleet size, before and after the skirmish.
Gentlemen, I realize that being military enthusiasts you root for your home base. However I'd urge you to look past the events of February and focus on the aftermath. It was a small-scale, localized skirmish. It doesn't matter who came out on top that day, rather what lessons were learnt and what gaps were identified. IAF clearly benefited a lot more than PAF when it comes to that.
I rest my case.
Yes. It found its mark but the mark was either a chaff cloud or a ghost radar echo generated by EW system of Su-30MKI and not an actual Su-30MKI. But there is no doubt that R-73 blasted off an F-16B.an F-16B, piloted by S/L Hassan, launched the AIM-120 that made its mark.
Yes. It found its mark but the mark was either a chaff cloud or a ghost radar echo generated by EW system of Su-30MKI and not an actual Su-30MKI. But there is no doubt that R-73 blasted off an F-16B.
In every video of the engagement that we have not seen even one single deplyoment of flares by either side. So there is no question of R-73 being fooled or having picked a wrong heat signature.
1. Any proof that it was in actual IAF presser??@BlackOpsIndia i have a question ,i have watched all these events which was unfolding like all other enthusiasts
my question is
1) at any point in the fog of war IAF said anything like " all our pilots ,planes are accounted for" or it was usual shenanigans by our media quoting from the sources
2) i have read two version ,press statement said" Pakistanis plane violated our border space" and bs dhanoa said they never ingressed
which one is correct
Most probably a chaff ( that if they are truthful about the radar blip) if they want to make the fog thick with this claim to hide doosra banda.... then no one can helpYes. It found its mark but the mark was either a chaff cloud or a ghost radar echo generated by EW system of Su-30MKI and not an actual Su-30MKI. But there is no doubt that R-73 blasted off an F-16B.
In every video of the engagement that we have not seen even one single deplyoment of flares by either side. So there is no question of R-73 being fooled or having picked a wrong heat signature.
It was from Vishnu Som or Shiv Aroor I guess, few minutes after conflict via sources, IAF NEVER made such claim, after around 2houra IAF told one Mig21 and pilot is missing in action. I remember it as if it happened today, you can cross check, infact I was the one who posted in that thread of all pilots accounted for after his tweet, IAF never made that claim.1) at any point in the fog of war IAF said anything like " all our pilots ,planes are accounted for" or it was usual shenanigans by our media quoting from the sources
It was technical violation as explained by @Falcon many a times, any party coming within 10km of airspace of LOC is technically violating the others airspace. They never really crossed LOC and even Pakistan didn't claim they did. Abhi was the only one I think who crossed it. So they violated the airspace and didn't ingressed both are correct.) i have read two version ,press statement said" Pakistanis plane violated our border space" and bs dhanoa said they never ingressed
That I agree with, but it was more of what actually happened for me than who won. And as far as bigger picture goes India is way too strongly prepared after this 370 removal than they were for Pulwama revenge.It doesn't matter who came out on top that day, rather what lessons were learnt and what gaps were identified. IAF clearly benefited a lot more than PAF when it comes to that.
Yes. It found its mark but the mark was either a chaff cloud or a ghost radar echo generated by EW system of Su-30MKI and not an actual Su-30MKI. But there is no doubt that R-73 blasted off an F-16B.
In every video of the engagement that we have not seen even one single deplyoment of flares by either side. So there is no question of R-73 being fooled or having picked a wrong heat signature.
I fail to understand, how do senior and junior staff of your armed forces commit such basic errors? How long will you put up with this chauthi jamaat mein chaar baar fail, fools? Look at where it's landed you?@BlackOpsIndia Sir, as expected, it was a typing error. KT has rectified it and apparently provided an explanation:View attachment 9693
Link to the updated blog-post: Aeronaut
Thank you and others on twitter for pointing it out.
@BlackOpsIndia Sir, as expected, it was a typing error. KT has rectified it and apparently provided an explanation:View attachment 9693
Link to the updated blog-post: Aeronaut
Thank you and others on twitter for pointing it out.