Very old tech. Nothing "serious" or "destabilizing" about this.
Indeed. This is why they have a "moving satellite" called X-37. It is probably made to avoid a too easy targeted satellite solution.
I hope the end will be different.
I found Europe more secure under cold war. Far less low IQ immigration = far far less street violence.I don't think anything violent will happen though, just a new arms race and a new cold war. And this time Europe may have to fight alone 'cause the US has to deal with China, and without the high economic and population growth Europe experienced during the Cold War.
Very old tech. Nothing "serious" or "destabilizing" about this.
This move opens the Pandora's Box of 4th leg of nuclear delivery system from Triad to Quad Land Based Silos, Sea using SSBN, Air & now Space Based warheads that won't need missiles that are vulnerable to Anti Ballistic missiles and missile defence systems like S500s.Alarm Raised Over Destabilizing New Russian Threat In Space: Reports
It is unclear exactly what space-based capabilities, if any, this pertains to, but there are some very clear and troubling possibilities.www.twz.com
Interesting development.
@Picdelamirand-oil @vstol Jockey @BMD @Rajput Lion @Soldier35 @Parthu @Tatvamasi @Innominate @Ginvincible @A Person @Bon Plan @Amarante @Herciv @Ashwin @Gautam @marich01 @YoungWolf @jetray @Sathya @screambowl @Ankit Kumar @RASALGHUL @lcafanboy @screambowl @Hydra et al
Alarm Raised Over Destabilizing New Russian Threat In Space: Reports
It is unclear exactly what space-based capabilities, if any, this pertains to, but there are some very clear and troubling possibilities.www.twz.com
Interesting development.
@Picdelamirand-oil @vstol Jockey @BMD @Rajput Lion @Soldier35 @Parthu @Tatvamasi @Innominate @Ginvincible @A Person @Bon Plan @Amarante @Herciv @Ashwin @Gautam @marich01 @YoungWolf @jetray @Sathya @screambowl @Ankit Kumar @RASALGHUL @lcafanboy @screambowl @Hydra et al
This is quoting officials describing it as a nuclear anti-satellite weapon, so that pretty much confirms the above.
US facing 'serious' security threat: top lawmakers
Washington (AFP) Feb 14, 2024 - The United States is facing a new and serious national security threat, top officials warned Wednesday, with two media outlets reporting it involves a Russian attempt to build a space-based nuclear capability.www.spacewar.com
Space is the next war domain. Americans are developing satellites that can do the job of AWACS and track air moving targets. It's also no coincidence that IAF wants to transition into IASFThis move opens the Pandora's Box of 4th leg of nuclear delivery system from Triad to Quad Land Based Silos, Sea using SSBN, Air & now Space Based warheads that won't need missiles that are vulnerable to Anti Ballistic missiles and missile defence systems like S500s.
Also opens space based Anti Ballistic missile defence system both kinetic and lasers & space based ASATs. Space based Radars that can cover huge areas and track everything coming near your borders. There are many aspects to it.
These systems will make wars very expensive and can push up defence budgets of many countries that can bring down budget for social welfare, health, education & can even make them go bankrupt if countries start weapons race...
Not a good thing for humanity though....
Not too tricky for an SM-3 IIA to shoot down though.I'd imagine the reason for employing a nuclear-derived power source is to ensure it has enough energy to keep changing it's orbital plane?
Combine that with a ionized gas-emitting propulsion system, and any such satellite can be quite difficult to effectively keep track of.
No, it's not, at least not in that sense. If it was I imagine the threat would be described as 'immediate'. It could still be dangerous if it targeted ground radars during an attack though, depending on capabilities.
Nearly unlimited ability to maneuver between different orbits, overlaid with ionized gas emission means it's very difficult to maintain Space Situational Awareness on the platform.
Could disappear from here & pop up over there - and unless you send a X37B or another co-orbital platform to verify it's visual ID, there's no way to know where it really is.
Gels with it not being an "immediate threat".
I found Europe more secure under cold war. Far less low IQ immigration = far far less street violence.
Same can be said about economy.
Just my own opinion.
This move opens the Pandora's Box of 4th leg of nuclear delivery system from Triad to Quad Land Based Silos, Sea using SSBN, Air & now Space Based warheads that won't need missiles that are vulnerable to Anti Ballistic missiles and missile defence systems like S500s.
Also opens space based Anti Ballistic missile defence system both kinetic and lasers & space based ASATs. Space based Radars that can cover huge areas and track everything coming near your borders. There are many aspects to it.
These systems will make wars very expensive and can push up defence budgets of many countries that can bring down budget for social welfare, health, education & can even make them go bankrupt if countries start weapons race...
Not a good thing for humanity though....
Not too tricky for an SM-3 IIA to shoot down though.
No, it's not, at least not in that sense. If it was I imagine the threat would be described as 'immediate'. It could still be dangerous if it targeted ground radars during an attack though, depending on capabilities.
I'm fairly sure the US must have some undisclosed capabilities, the number of launches by the USSF since 2022 is huge.It needs to be a new unknown capability though. Like that new hypersonic weapon from China that can orbit around the globe.
I'm fairly sure the US must have some undisclosed capabilities, the number of launches by the USSF since 2022 is huge.
US has an even greater supply of SM-3 IIAs with the same terminal capability.Anyway, it's very likely that the Americans are referring to the S-550.
This BMD is capable of bringing down ICBMs, and can be bought in enough numbers to threaten Western deterrence. It's expected to begin fielding in 2025 and could take at least until 2030-35 for sufficient numbers to provide deterrence against nearly 2000 nuke warheads.
So it fulfills the criteria of a new capability and words like serious and destabilizing and long term. Even the Russians claim it is "never-before-seen."
Russia is open to export it to India. Our BMD is aimed for up to IRBMs, so we are still missing an anti-ICBM capability.