Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile : News, Updates and Discussions

Wow ! That's ~ 500 nos give or take . Wonder when are the IA & IAF going to follow suit . We need all these missiles particularly the long ranged ones like Shaurya in huge nos meaning in the thousands ~ 2-3000 of each iteration of these missiles to be in a comfortable position. .
It seems the order is for 200 missiles. With that kind of price tag, the number of targets this missile can be used against, will be rather limited. India has to develop a cheaper option ASAP.
 
It seems the order is for 200 missiles. With that kind of price tag, the number of targets this missile can be used against, will be rather limited. India has to develop a cheaper option ASAP.
There is already a program called GlideFire which will replace the Kh-35.
 
It seems the order is for 200 missiles.

That leaves about Rs 1,300 crore (Rs 13 billion) for 38 BrahMos missiles, putting the cost of each missile at about Rs 34 crore/Rs 340 million ($4.85 million).



With that kind of price tag, the number of targets this missile can be used against, will be rather limited. India has to develop a cheaper option ASAP.
 
 
Per Panditji the longer range variant also done maiden test.
Though hard to gauge it from test notam areas
also, why ships only? subs can also carry it & there was job vacancy that read like major missile vls fitting related work. So they can fit Brahmos on the subs in dual use role?

It's impossible to put VL Brahmos inside any submarine we operate. It's a 3ton/28ft missile. It's too big and expensive. Can't be used everywhere.
 
It's impossible to put VL Brahmos inside any submarine we operate. It's a 3ton/28ft missile. It's too big and expensive. Can't be used everywhere.
Then how come they show a sub launched version? we tested few times from a pontoon, maybe in future we will put it on a desi sub?
 
Indeed I chose the ~5 m USD price tag . Even if we admit to improved iterations 200 missiles for 2.5 b USD works out to 12.5 m USD . How exactly does an improved version of the missile go from 5 m to 12.5 m is beyond me . I used 5 m coz I thought 12.5 m was a misprint .
 
Indeed I chose the ~5 m USD price tag . Even if we admit to improved iterations 200 missiles for 2.5 b USD works out to 12.5 m USD . How exactly does an improved version of the missile go from 5 m to 12.5 m is beyond me . I used 5 m coz I thought 12.5 m was a misprint .
As per the news it’s 75 cr I.e. around 9 mil $. Few days back I came across another article which quoted the price as 8 mil. I agree there is no reasonable explanation why the price has jumped from 3 mil ( few years back) to 8-9 mil. But then anything can happen in India.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Anonymous_
As per the news it’s 75 cr I.e. around 9 mil $. Few days back I came across another article which quoted the price as 8 mil. I agree there is no reasonable explanation why the price has jumped from 3 mil ( few years back) to 8-9 mil. But then anything can happen in India.
Seems like hafta vasooli has increased.
 
From the other forum by @EagleEye: Nirbhay with russian engine. ITCM with manik engine. Nirbhay aka LR-LACM going under design change. Folded wing in lower part of nirbhay missle may move to centre. Warhead weight may also increase! Navy is hand-holding the program. Dont ask sauce!
 
From the other forum by @EagleEye: Nirbhay with russian engine. ITCM with manik engine. Nirbhay aka LR-LACM going under design change. Folded wing in lower part of nirbhay missle may move to centre. Warhead weight may also increase! Navy is hand-holding the program. Dont ask sauce!
Another feather in the cap of ADE & GTRE.
 
From the other forum by @EagleEye: Nirbhay with russian engine. ITCM with manik engine. Nirbhay aka LR-LACM going under design change. Folded wing in lower part of nirbhay missle may move to centre. Warhead weight may also increase! Navy is hand-holding the program. Dont ask sauce!
Nirbhay is not equal to LR-LACM. Its a new missile derived from original TD program to fit the requirements for particular services. Thus redesign is evident.