Next time I post such views, I'd make sure to add aIcg unfortunately has no ships capable of firing missiles. It has only 76mm guns.
to it for better comprehension by you.Next time I post such views, I'd make sure to add aIcg unfortunately has no ships capable of firing missiles. It has only 76mm guns.
to it for better comprehension by you.I believe the Phillipines export order is our first. Even though it's for 2 regiment only.Why the hurry?
R&D takes time. We finished the development of Brahmos-1 variants by the middle of the previous decade. Then we began the development of advanced versions at the fag end of the previous decade and are now in the construction and even flight testing phase of some of these advanced variants.
You may recall that a lot of things changed after India became part of MTCR in 2016, so some designs went back to the drawing board and some new designs were added in.
Export clearance is a very recent event. So why the hurry?
No. Original plans were 500 for India, 500 for Russia and 1000 for export. India's current orders are more than 500.
Your expectations for Brahmos are based on your own fantasies. No one's gonna meet it.
Lol. Many noob people even seriously believe such statements trust meNext time I post such views, I'd make sure to add ato it for better comprehension by you.

Heard about 800km & mini versions. But is it true that we are working with 1500 km version? I didn't heard about it so far.
Also there is no room for 1500 km ranged Nirbhay (if the project become successful ) and a 1500 km ranged ulta expensive Brahmose.
I believe the Phillipines export order is our first. Even though it's for 2 regiment only.



1) Not Nirbhay, but ITCM-03.Flew 150 km, is it a miss reporting on range? Or another failure from Nirbhay

Neither does Brahmos.ASMP is stato ==> it doesn't need to carry oxygene so total mass is divided by two.
So its failed again, i dont beleive the media reports like we already inducted this missile with forces.The missile was fired just prior to 10 am and remained airborne for 15 minutes, covering a distance of 100 km. As per DRDO sources, while the indigenous engine tested successfully, the delivery platform encountered a technical hitch.
![]()
DRDO tests Nirbhay missile, indigenous engine a success: What you need to know about India's subsonic missile
The last test of the subsonic missile was carried out in October 2020 when the trial had to be aborted after just eight minutes.www.timesnownews.com
Indranil mentioned somewhere in Twitter.. We have around 20-30 nibhaya frames made as a batch.So its failed again, i dont beleive the media reports like we already inducted this missile with forces.
Just a speculation I guess. I do respect him,but he behaves like a an indigenous item fan boy most of the time. May be an attempt to boost homegrown equipment reputation or a deliberate attempt to stir confusion among enemies on our capabilities.Indranil mentioned somewhere in Twitter.. We have around 20-30 nibhaya frames made as a batch.
Deployed missiles are using Russian Turbofan engine.So its failed again, i dont beleive the media reports like we already inducted this missile with forces.
Just 3 successful tests out of 7 before the deployment news came. U still beleive that news about deployment? Also not tested for full range in last successful test too.Deployed missiles are using Russian Turbofan engine.
Details are not provided. Many times in integrating new components, neither component in itself are faulty but integration is not correct. Any engineering student knows, integration is the hardest problem there.FYI the brand new failure of yesterday is due to missile proble asper that link,not on engine. It says missile is having glitches still.

User doesn't care about those things,they don't need to.what user is required is credible, reasonably reliable product. Nirbhay & the word reliable didn't go together till today. And there is no any official statement from military on Nirbhay deployment,what we have is some fanboys statements/reporting/tube videos.Details are not provided. Many times in integrating new components, neither component in itself are faulty but integration is not correct. Any engineering student knows, integration is the hardest problem there.
View attachment 20568
If you want to be really honest, you don't know what was tested and what was achieved or what failed. There are always "un-named sources" used by media. You don't even know if this was Nirbhay or something totally different. All that was there was some reporting in media. There is no official word of test besides perhaps NOTAM.User doesn't care about those things,they don't need to.what user is required is credible, reasonably reliable product. Nirbhay & the word reliable didn't go together till today. And there is no any official statement from military on Nirbhay deployment,what we have is some fanboys statements/reporting/tube videos.
The first part is always true for each and every missile we tests,none failed the way Nirbhay did. This itself shows how pathetic is it's development.If you want to be really honest, you don't know what was tested and what was achieved or what failed. There are always "un-named sources" used by media. You don't even know if this was Nirbhay or something totally different. All that was there was some reporting in media. There is no official word of test besides perhaps NOTAM.