24 pages of utter BS subsequently any procurement is not effective against Pakistan as they have successfully maintained conventional equillibrium with India.
I too seriously doubt that Modi and BJP is getting funds from USA. While Russia backs congress at all levels.Two points Kshitij.
Please understand. Assassination? A theory. Can you give a rationale for it? USSR got all it's objectives. It is a red herring just like SC Bose being alive.
As for others, there was no "TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER'. Has it been mentioned as such? The Khalistan issue and the Kashmir and Kamraj's? Please do read about the subversions in Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Kashmir as Indira Gandhi tried to subvert regional parties. This discussion will take the thread off course. Read about it and if you have queries, you post them in the member's section to clarify.
Also understand that I am pointing to you to look towards answering your questions through your own research. There is also the theory that Sonia Gandhi's father, an Italian soldier and POW of Russia, was 'turned' by the then NKVD and GRU along with KGB (NKVD's successor) were controlling him. As part of the same reportedly she was "placed"
That the Mitrokhin report, reportedly quoted him as stating that post 2003 elections, SVR had managed an asset at the highest echelons of Indian Governance, was again a point fuelling the above theory as Sonia Gandhi flew to Moscow just immediately upon winning the elections without much fanfare and in a low key affair.
Recall PV Narasimha Rao, one of the most dynamic and visionary yet underappreciated PM of India, got his daughter's US residency immediately after backtracking from conducting an overt nuclear test in 1995 (was it? just check the year). MMS was at Harvard and his name was already announced as FM in a French Daily even before he was appointed.
Also, there has been the infamous 'mole' in Indira's cabinet and also an intelligence report by Indian Military Intelligence, reportedly naming presently active and famous politicians who have and are receiving funds from multiple countries both friendly and adversarial.
These include politicians from across the political spectrum. So, your heading into that direction will be a Pandora's box. That is why, we have extreme compartmentalisation with most of the top leadership not aware of 'sensitive' information, which may be made available to PM on emergent requirement and not informed in routine or even as a executive brief.
There are lot of red herrings and lot of truth to it. The Technical Services Division under Gen Vk Singh was nothing new. Military Intelligence keeps tabs. But the beauty of the Indian Democracy is that Armed Forces do not have the mandate to intervene in political affairs, a policy well tested and correctly adhered to.
Recall the invite of Indira Gandhi to COAS to take over during emergency. She would have played the victim then
What I am saying is that accept that the system is penetrated by vested interests. Also understand that all do not become proxy to these interests, merely use them to promote their interests.
24 pages of utter BS subsequently any procurement is not effective against Pakistan as they have successfully maintained conventional equillibrium with India.
India is on its own. Congress, after the fall of Soviets, went under USA control. Nambi Narayan case sabotage of Cryogenic engine, Vajpayee govt collapse in 1999, Sonia Gandhi being installed, Lalu Yadav and cronies collapsing stonewalling BJP govt in 1996 etc were USA's deeds. The signing of Nuclear deal was also by US directiv. It was stated that the deal was a first step to non-proliferation. India had enough coal for hundreds of years and there was no need to convert a measly 3GW (3%) energy into imported Uranium under IAEA safeguards. Indian nuclear plants were almost all designed in PHWR for plutonium generation (except for a few reactors). The nuclear deal was a big antinational move.I too seriously doubt that Modi and BJP is getting funds from USA. While Russia backs congress at all levels.
Very much possible that I m wrong here.
It's not uncredible !The way things are going, I see more rafale orders as I suspect the rafale deal was for obtaining Kaveri consultancy. India has asked for infrastructure of more than 36 planes while order is for 36 planes only. It appears that India has put a condition that only after Kaveri engine is delivered, the next batch will be ordered. This will be as a payment for Kaveri help, not because Rafales are awesome.
I am sure by 2023-2024 they will be ready enough to churn out big nos and take the production further up from 83mk1a. By then indigenous Kaveri with safran help might just be ready.HAL is far from ready to churn out the numbers required. That remains a fact. Until and unless an indigenous engine is available, forget about it.
There are things we need not discuss here. But suffice to say, several critical issues remain with HAL-DRDO products.
I am sure by 2023-2024 they will be ready enough to churn out big nos and take the production further up from 83mk1a. By then indigenous Kaveri with safran help might just be ready.
The MRCBF offer from France included giving a training squadron on lease right now itself for SBTF.
looks like the french are upping the stakes for a deeper Indo-French co-operation. is this mostly for the money? or is there some grouping of France against China?cos ultimately, the rafale will be used mostly against China and Pak.All this is FREE OF COST and is being offered for the deep India France Relationship
I would say it's pure business. They are just making sure IAF is Intrested in plane and are aware of all good qualities of the system. They know their only hope of more orders is a strong push from IAF. They know who will bat for them so trying to keep intrest alive.looks like the french are upping the stakes for a deeper Indo-French co-operation. is this mostly for the money? or is there some grouping of France against China?cos ultimately, the rafale will be used mostly against China and Pak.
The cost of infrastructure is included in the deal. It is French duty to build it properly and hence they will be flying their rafales to check and test it.Credit to @Abingdonboy
In a candid discussion with an insider, our @Abingdonboy got few more information tid bits
- French offering to bring some of their FrAF Rafales by mid-2018 to test the new Rafale infrastructure prior to proper Rafale induction in 2019.
- This will also allow first-hand training to few more local folks other than main trained people in France
- File is with MOD for consideration and approval
- All this is FREE OF COST and is being offered for the deep India France Relationship
- This follows with earlier offer of Rafale M for SBTF test
Apparently lot of scope here if we make a decision soon
@Picdelamirand-oil @Hellfire @halloweene @Bon Plan @nair @Tarun @randomradio @Milspec @vstol Jockey @Ankit Kumar @Nick @GuardianRED @all
looks like the french are upping the stakes for a deeper Indo-French co-operation. is this mostly for the money? or is there some grouping of France against China?cos ultimately, the rafale will be used mostly against China and Pak.
Credit to @Abingdonboy
In a candid discussion with an insider, our @Abingdonboy got few more information tid bits
- French offering to bring some of their FrAF Rafales by mid-2018 to test the new Rafale infrastructure prior to proper Rafale induction in 2019.
- This will also allow first-hand training to few more local folks other than main trained people in France
- File is with MOD for consideration and approval
- All this is FREE OF COST and is being offered for the deep India France Relationship
- This follows with earlier offer of Rafale M for SBTF test
Apparently lot of scope here if we make a decision soon
@Picdelamirand-oil @Hellfire @halloweene @Bon Plan @nair @Tarun @randomradio @Milspec @vstol Jockey @Ankit Kumar @Nick @GuardianRED @all
In what sense? Indigenous manufacturing is everything. Pakistan doesn't have enough Uranium, doesn't make helicopters, trucks, tanks, 3rd generation ATGM like NAG, doesn't have SAMs, doesn't have BVR, radars, Sonars, satellites and so on. They may be importing some items here and there but if India begins indigenous manufacturing, there is no stopping it.
The cost of infrastructure is included in the deal. It is French duty to build it properly and hence they will be flying their rafales to check and test it.
It is not free but a way of being sure. France can't afford to botch up and then receive complaints from India. I don't really see any deep relation here. France is not an ally of India unless they give us ToT. These people are good in making gestures. But, real relation is shown by action, not words and gestures. ToT is that action. France didn't give ToT for Rafale or even for Scorpene submarine.
Israel is a real ally as it needs as many friends as possible and has helped time and again when India needed in a very quick and timely manner, even providing weapons on credit. The same has not been seen by French.
I've often been an advocate of the theory that stupidity should invite capital punishment . Think of it this way , there'd be no Hitler but then our independence would be delayed and in all likelihood would have been a bloody affair too. What're your views on this subject ?
Two points Kshitij.
Please understand. Assassination? A theory. Can you give a rationale for it? USSR got all it's objectives. It is a red herring just like SC Bose being alive.
As for others, there was no "TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER'. Has it been mentioned as such? The Khalistan issue and the Kashmir and Kamraj's? Please do read about the subversions in Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Kashmir as Indira Gandhi tried to subvert regional parties. This discussion will take the thread off course. Read about it and if you have queries, you post them in the member's section to clarify.
Also understand that I am pointing to you to look towards answering your questions through your own research. There is also the theory that Sonia Gandhi's father, an Italian soldier and POW of Russia, was 'turned' by the then NKVD and GRU along with KGB (NKVD's successor) were controlling him. As part of the same reportedly she was "placed"
That the Mitrokhin report, reportedly quoted him as stating that post 2003 elections, SVR had managed an asset at the highest echelons of Indian Governance, was again a point fuelling the above theory as Sonia Gandhi flew to Moscow just immediately upon winning the elections without much fanfare and in a low key affair.
Recall PV Narasimha Rao, one of the most dynamic and visionary yet underappreciated PM of India, got his daughter's US residency immediately after backtracking from conducting an overt nuclear test in 1995 (was it? just check the year). MMS was at Harvard and his name was already announced as FM in a French Daily even before he was appointed.
Also, there has been the infamous 'mole' in Indira's cabinet and also an intelligence report by Indian Military Intelligence, reportedly naming presently active and famous politicians who have and are receiving funds from multiple countries both friendly and adversarial.
These include politicians from across the political spectrum. So, your heading into that direction will be a Pandora's box. That is why, we have extreme compartmentalisation with most of the top leadership not aware of 'sensitive' information, which may be made available to PM on emergent requirement and not informed in routine or even as a executive brief.
There are lot of red herrings and lot of truth to it. The Technical Services Division under Gen Vk Singh was nothing new. Military Intelligence keeps tabs. But the beauty of the Indian Democracy is that Armed Forces do not have the mandate to intervene in political affairs, a policy well tested and correctly adhered to.
Recall the invite of Indira Gandhi to COAS to take over during emergency. She would have played the victim then
What I am saying is that accept that the system is penetrated by vested interests. Also understand that all do not become proxy to these interests, merely use them to promote their interests.
Timely action depends on time. Now is not the time. Until oil runs out or severely depleted, it won't be the timeIf you have no timely action then all the chunks of metal toys would be waste.
I was commenting about "deep relation" between Franc and India. Without ToT, I won't consider it any more than trade/business.Problem is the next alternative is not providing ToT , even to its retiring legacy fighter.
Though Welcome news.Credit to @Abingdonboy
In a candid discussion with an insider, our @Abingdonboy got few more information tid bits
- French offering to bring some of their FrAF Rafales by mid-2018 to test the new Rafale infrastructure prior to proper Rafale induction in 2019.
- This will also allow first-hand training to few more local folks other than main trained people in France
- File is with MOD for consideration and approval
- All this is FREE OF COST and is being offered for the deep India France Relationship
- This follows with earlier offer of Rafale M for SBTF test
Apparently lot of scope here if we make a decision soon
@Picdelamirand-oil @Hellfire @halloweene @Bon Plan @nair @Tarun @randomradio @Milspec @vstol Jockey @Ankit Kumar @Nick @GuardianRED @all
Oh! So then for the sake singularity of spares, lets just buy one single type of fighter jets from now on. I mean, logistics do win wars don't they?
Either your so called 'Senior Pilot' is an incompetent fool or you're just taking his comments out of context to support your narrative. They fact that the A-330s were highlighted during an Air Mobility presentation with the Indian Army points to the fact that both IAF and IA consider them as excellent troop transports.
With the same platform capable of being converted into a tanker, transport and AWACS its only prudent to look at that option. Meanwhile specialized transports like C-17s, C-130s and Il-76s are configured for cargo, with the capability to transport troops as well. But using them just for mobilizing troop is a waste of resources hence other options are being looked at.
To your question as to why the Il-76 upgrades are being looked at, the answer is plain simple. The airframes have a lot of life left, and the aircraft is going for its next life extension program. Also, due to the fact that IAF did not get their required number of Heavy lift Strategic transports because of the red-tape marred bureaucracy in our country.