Maybe they have, maybe not. Either way , we will know soon enough. What @Falcon said about GTI makes sense in this scenario. Folks here are just debating the possibility of it. Besides, these Indian handles have driven Pakistanis crazy over the last 24 hours. Which in itself is a good thing.
India - Pakistan Standoff 2019
- Thread starter nair
- Start date
- Status
Maybe they have, maybe not. Either way , we will know soon enough. What @Falcon said about GTI makes sense in this scenario. Folks here are just debating the possibility of it. Besides, these Indian handles have driven Pakistanis crazy over the last 24 hours. Which in itself is a good thing.
I read it for few days and thought they will come to senses and talk rationally but they were so obsessed with Bhramos striking nuclear facility that it became absurd, never read it again no wonder they are finding Pakistani satellite, one of their major moderator is active on Twitter and tweets he likes and engages with looks like some child though he maybe above 50.
This is the only place where sanity strikes after few replies and if not, hellfire rains non stop
To be honest, No offence. I get the feeling too many people think themselves as superior to others. Discussions need to be curtailed to a specific set of topics and in a specific boundary so as to not feel outlandish. If you simply felt this is ridicules, ask them. Even Balakot airstrikes, and surgical strikes at some point felt outlandish. I could go on and point out specific hypocrisy but I am no mood to fight.
If you don't believe, talk to them. Stop ridiculing them just because you feel you have different opinions. People are simply discussing the possibilities of such actions. One of the reasons I left this forum for months is the very high handed attitude few people seem to have here.
This is not high-handedness but a basic application of brain won't kill anyone, how absurd it is to think we strike nuclear faculty using missiles! It's is not possibility and instead of stopping it keep finding reasons to justify it.
Nobody is asking you to fight and no surgical strikes or Balakot strikes were not outlandish, strikes inside Pakistan happened way before surgical strikes though not on that scale and definitely not overt. When situation demands actions are taken but there should be a situation like that. To strike with Bhramos you need to be hurt at that magnitude and you don't pick nuclear facilities as first target and leave it unfinished while a $10 Billion budget and $100 Billion business turnover army sit back comfortably.
If you feel a counter as some kind of high handedness then it's your choice but sugarcoating stupidity as "possibility" is really not digestible.
It took us 25 days to wire M2Ks for LGB strikes in Munthadhalo. Sometimes, strikes are done to demosntrate a capability and it is not necessary that the nuke facility had nukes at that time.
I AM NOT AT ALL STATING THAT WE STRUCK SOME SUCH FACILITY IN PAKISTAN USING BRAHMOS. I am just informing you that at times things are done which may not have any immediate tactical benefit but delivers a huge startegic benefit. Strategic benefit is not only in terms of the enemy but also the morale of own people.
Just read about Dolittle raid of WW-2 and the Vulcan Raid of Falkland War.
Maybe it is basic application of brain, if you don't like these opinions. Create an account and write a polite reply as to why you think these claims are unrealistic. Pulwama has hurt of lot of people, people are baying for blood. They may or may not believe outlandish things. They may think from their hearts than from their brains.
On one hand you claim its not high handedness and then following sentence you use "sugarcoating stupidity as "possibility". How hard is it for people to be polite? How hard is it for people to not ridicule. Is it that difficult to restrain yourself a little bit? Do you really think using these fancy words will help you convince anyone? When was the last time ridiculing and making fun of people convened them of their mistakes?
This isn't PDF where you are dealing and laughing and ridiculing pakistanis. These are your own people, you deal with them differently.
Hope I made my point clear.
Depends upon situation and adversary sir. We can hit Nepal or Sri Lanka Parliament with cruise or ballistic missile with impunity and they won't be able to do anything but Pakistan is not weak militarily. This action can never go unanswered and unnoticed with half of world breathing down our neck threatening crippling sanctions.
Sir, for the specific bold.
AWACS was on station in depth area. This news that there was no AWACS on station has been quoted to me by a Pakistani member too. But the same is, I believe, based on some ex-IAF writing as such.
It is an incorrect assertion by the gentleman.
If my reply made you feel offended my apologies and everyone else who felt that way.
Sir.
The same appears to have been a secondary target, primary having been rendered 'awry'.
I have survived 12 bans in PDF
, I am rarely offended. Just saying, Many are thinking with their hearts than their brains. There is a scar over there which won't heal easily since Pulwama.
Sir.
Very much expected. The positioning of MR-SAM before undertaking the strike to reinforce the exiting AD units in Srinagar, Awantipore and Udhampur, points to the same too.
In that case explain to me why GCIO controlled the Intercept and the battle and not AWACS?
Retaliation was expected but not so soon and not in broad daylight. IAF did get a surprise. So much so that they had detected these formations getting airborne way earlier but did not think that they are going to attack targets in India. It was only when some of them approached the 10Km line that things became serious.
- Status