The US is required to make public the records containing detailed information of end use monitoring of US made assets. Even if US doesn't issue a press statement on this topic, a simple Freedom of Information act request will yield the requisite details. We might be just a few days away from an official aircraft count being made public.
We have to prepare for the possibility of no F-16s being found missing from PAF inventory. The implication of this will be massive. The IAF and GOI will lose any credibility with national and international media and more importantly, with it's citizens. The IAF's credibility will have been permanently eroded, never to be regained. Its very reputation as a credible, capable force will be decimated in eyes of people who matter, and consequently, the loss of deterrence the Air Force Should present to potential hostiles.
Reputation once lost at such a level will never be regained, no matter how anyone tries to sugar-coat it.
@Falcon , it is absolutely the prerogative of the IAF and the GOI to release information/proof. But by being conservative wrt to information sharing, whilst the other side now may have third party evidence to back up its own evidence, the narrative will decisively shift to IAFs disadvantage.
You've already seen people clinging to the words of whoever is spreading rumors, due to the lack of adequate information. If the US statement does appear, IAF now risks losing the confidence of the very people whom they asked to believe in them
20 years back a nation chose not to take into confidence its citizens. It backfired lick a mule kick to the crotch. We now stand at the same precipice. The IAF and GOI chose not to take the people into confidence. Now they might not have the confidence of the same very people when this is over. And that will be a far more dangerous long term problem