Interesting discussion.
Yesterday PAF did a exercise and the Results were Very bad and gloomy for them
Interesting discussion.
@randomradio @vstol Jockey
Both of you have suddenly become Very Active on this thread
Did you receive some Interesting news
About likely activities and events
Babaji is also Hinting something
Gen Rawat is touring all forward areas
I have no idea what you are talking about.Yesterday PAF did a exercise and the Results were Very bad and gloomy for them
Malaysia and Turkey can be easily cooked by changing Palm oil supplier and cancelling 2.6b tanker deal with Turkey.I don't expect anything big to happen until Pakistan's been put on the blacklist. Perhaps by October.
I suppose Malaysia will have to be dealt with first.
If US wanted both these votes would have been neutralized. with all the stuff happening with Iran It's in the interest of US to keep pak in greylist and not downgrade it.Malaysia and Turkey can be easily cooked by changing Palm oil supplier and cancelling 2.6b tanker deal with Turkey.
So, what's the state of alert in a no war - no peace scenario? Kindly elaborate. We had enough air assets in the air such that the full magnitude of what we were up against became apparent at the 11th hour and we had to scramble what we had to square up to the PAF. All we could muster was 8 AC in the air. 2+2 undertaking CAP and 4 scrambled to tackle the incoming tangos. The rest of the MiG 29 or Mirages were too far South to even contemplate being tasked to tackle the incoming tangos.We are in a state of no war - no peace.
And we had enough assets in the air to stop an attack, which we did properly. Both Balakot and the air battle are feathers in the IAF's cap. One can imagine what could have been had Abhi escaped.
Even the US hasn't had the pleasure of fighting such a battle in a network-centric environment.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Considering the US will attack Iran, Which clearly trump is downplaying. At max, you will see the US retaliating by shooting down a drone or bombing a military asset without and loss of life. Both countries are already backing off.Simply because , when the whole world attention is focussed on Iran and US
Both sides expect the other to take advantage of this situation
Malaysia and Turkey can be easily cooked by changing Palm oil supplier and cancelling 2.6b tanker deal with Turkey.
We have to turn Malaysia towards us, like we did Sri Lanka and Maldives.
But I don't think much can be done about Turkey. They are firmly in Pak camp. And cancelling the tanker deal will only hurt us more, considering how long it takes us to get another deal going.
So, what's the state of alert in a no war - no peace scenario? Kindly elaborate. We had enough air assets in the air such that the full magnitude of what we were up against became apparent at the 11th hour and we had to scramble what we had to square up to the PAF. All we could muster was 8 AC in the air. 2+2 undertaking CAP and 4 scrambled to tackle the incoming tangos. The rest of the MiG 29 or Mirages were too far South to even contemplate being tasked to tackle the incoming tangos.
The events of the 27th Feb were a feather in the cap for the IAF? That's news. In spite of losing a helo to friendly fire, losing a MiG 21& having your pilot taken as a PoW and downing an F-16 about which a controversy still persists, apart from having your brigade HQ nearly blown away by PGM's One can imagine what would be the case if Wing Co Abhi didn't do what he did intentionally or unintentionally.
And we did a splendid job on the 27th Feb thanks to our newly acquired network centric warfare abilities, which incidentally PAF doesn't possess.
But did they do any damage? Why didn't they do any damage?
Or are you one of those who believes they spent so much time, personnel and money just so they can "miss deliberately"?
Your view. They certainly didn't win but they made their point. In their narrative they forced an over whelmingly superior air force to eat humble pie - a view as disconcerting as it is , isn't completely off the mark.Nothing was exposed. The Pakistanis came in, they lost, they left.
As I said, if we target their armed forces in their territory, they will gain sympathy. This is the classic case of supporting the underdog. And this in turn means financial support. It is India that should look weak and helpless and unable to do a thing about Pak sponsored terrorism so that the international community takes action. That's why we repeatedly called our strikes as "non-military strikes". Escalating matters after they are already down works in their favour.
As for losses at LoC, we have eliminated dozens to hundreds of soldiers, depending on where you get your news from. We have no interest in taking their BoPs, we would much rather they are unable to occupy their own BoPs instead while we sit safe in our BoPs.
Military force doesn't work against non-state actors. Look at the US in Afghanistan and Syria.
We need to pull financial support, which can't be done if we attack Pakistan.
We stopped them with what we had, didn't we?
Of course, there will be. How we react the next time will tell whether we have derived the right lessons or not. But we've stayed supine for so long that any reaction however half hearted and in half measure is like manna from heaven. That's how much we've punched below our weight and that's a measure of how much Pakistan has punched above its weight.Yes, even if the best team goes to play against the weakest cricket team, there will be some surprises.
Pakistanis do posses network centric capabilities. In fact, before we did. Ours is simply much more advanced.
So, the intent counts for nothing. Are you suggesting we act only of one of those PGM's cause material damage and casualties?
Prima facie, it doesn't appear to be the case. But this is Pakistan we're talking off. What else could they have targetted apart from military installations. But then where was the justification for it when India clearly declared the Balakote air strikes as pre emptive strikes at non military installations.
They could target our military installations, cause material damage and casualties and escalate. Which would clearly not be in its favour. So they opted to " Strike" Our military establishment and yet not strike them.
For if what you hold to be true, then it's absolutely inexcusable on our part not to respond in kind and for which you avoided taking retaliatory action claiming escalation.
Your view. They certainly didn't win but they made their point. In their narrative they forced an over whelmingly superior air force to eat humble pie - a view as disconcerting as it is , isn't completely off the mark.
Targeting their armed forces is long overdue especially after they attempted a hit on ours giving us ample justification to respond in kind. The world can & must be told, it's tit for tat. It'd suit the world if India just took it on their chin and moved along, like we've done forever. Why did we even initiate Balalote then. We could've kept quiet and won the appreciation of the world for our restraint and pats on the back
Escalating matters to debilitate their air Force by taking down a few planes preferably their F- 16's or their AWACS / A&EW works in our favour in the long run.
Yes. All those tweets by Baba Benaras or whatever moniker he goes by are good to boost our self esteem. I propose the next time there's a Pulwama, we do nothing except warfare by Twitter.
If they aren't working, why's the US still there in Afghanistan and what exactly have been their achievements since they overturned the Taliban regime.
We need to pull financial support as well as take our PA / PAF / PN assets apart from targeting their non state actors and supporting infrastructure.
With a bit of luck, yes. It could easily have gone the other way.
Of course, there will be. How we react the next time will tell whether we have derived the right lessons or not. But we've stayed supine for so long that any reaction however half hearted and in half measure is like manna from heaven. That's how much we've punched below our weight and that's a measure of how much Pakistan has punched above its weight.
So, what's the state of alert in a no war - no peace scenario? Kindly elaborate. We had enough air assets in the air such that the full magnitude of what we were up against became apparent at the 11th hour and we had to scramble what we had to square up to the PAF. All we could muster was 8 AC in the air. 2+2 undertaking CAP and 4 scrambled to tackle the incoming tangos. The rest of the MiG 29 or Mirages were too far South to even contemplate being tasked to tackle the incoming tangos.
The events of the 27th Feb were a feather in the cap for the IAF? That's news. In spite of losing a helo to friendly fire, losing a MiG 21& having your pilot taken as a PoW and downing an F-16 about which a controversy still persists, apart from having your brigade HQ nearly blown away by PGM's One can imagine what would be the case if Wing Co Abhi didn't do what he did intentionally or unintentionally.
And we did a splendid job on the 27th Feb thanks to our newly acquired network centric warfare abilities, which incidentally PAF doesn't possess.
Malaysia and Turkey can be easily cooked by changing Palm oil supplier and cancelling 2.6b tanker deal with Turkey.
So, what's the state of alert in a no war - no peace scenario? Kindly elaborate. We had enough air assets in the air such that the full magnitude of what we were up against became apparent at the 11th hour and we had to scramble what we had to square up to the PAF. All we could muster was 8 AC in the air. 2+2 undertaking CAP and 4 scrambled to tackle the incoming tangos. The rest of the MiG 29 or Mirages were too far South to even contemplate being tasked to tackle the incoming tangos.
The events of the 27th Feb were a feather in the cap for the IAF? That's news. In spite of losing a helo to friendly fire, losing a MiG 21& having your pilot taken as a PoW and downing an F-16 about which a controversy still persists, apart from having your brigade HQ nearly blown away by PGM's One can imagine what would be the case if Wing Co Abhi didn't do what he did intentionally or unintentionally.
And we did a splendid job on the 27th Feb thanks to our newly acquired network centric warfare abilities, which incidentally PAF doesn't possess.