When I said it's none of our concerns, it means that we do not have any role to play in it's implosion / degeneration. It does not transpire that this won't have any repercussions on our national security. I'd rather the IAF plays to it's strength than calculate or rather miscalculate, underestimating the PAF and barely getting out of jail as on 27th Feb.
I admire the way you conflate issues and attempt to change the framework of the debate. In case you haven't noticed, the entire discussion over the past 24 hours has been centred around the events of the 27th Feb & not on Balakote.
The very fact that they attempted something like this in broad daylight tells you that the so called overwhelming strength the IAF was supposed to bring to bear on the PAF didn't work. The PAF wasn't deterred.
Your interpretation. I only hope you aren't spinning off the Abhinandan episode as another incident of friendly fire by stating that the "only major loss was what we suffered by our own hands. "
What PAF demonstrated on 27th Feb was they aren't a walk over and while in a full blown war they'd be at the receiving end, they have enough up their sleeves to extract a cost of the IAF. That to me is salient lesson of 27th Feb.
Meanwhile, you can continue to spin things to fit in with your narrative in keeping with the glittering results of Operation Gaganshakti. I doubt the IAF itself would share your optimism, after 27th Feb . It must also be added that while the IA has done some preparation for skirmishes , short of a war - long or short, as we witnessed in the aftermath of 26 / 27 Feb along the LoC , the IAF is still going about this in a very conventional manner.
So, according to you China is providing equipment to the Pakistanis free of cost. That's a new one. Please elaborate if you can. I'd be most interested to see how far and in what direction you go with this.
The P-3's may well have not cost the Pakistanis a dime but they were paid for by US aid, which otherwise would have fetched them other equipment. So, it's a cost to Pakistan whichever way you see it.
Okay, can you tell me where the IAF went wrong and what they should do to improve that?
If we do tremendous damage to PN, the Chinese will cover the damages. 4 Chinese frigates are just $1B and 4 subs are even less than that. The Chinese can raise 1 PN every year without affecting their own modernisation. In exchange, half the IN will get tied up in the Arabian Sea instead of postring against the Chinese in BoB and the SCS.
This is what even @Falcon was pointing out, when he said all we need to do is funnel some money towards proxies in Afghanistan. This can drastically reduce our own defence spending. This is what Pakistan is doing to us.
It's only a delay, not a cost. Equipment that was supposed to be bought now will simply be bought another time. In India projects are delayed so badly, that the small delay Pakistan faces is of little consequence to them.
We should be able to thwart such large scale attacks , either by SAMs or Fighters in the Air
Secondly once we have attacked and are expecting Retaliation we should keep missiles and Bombers ready for Escalation
The thing is you are going to get a window of just 2 days , so make it count
I think @STEPHEN COHEN beat me to it. While I don't agree with all his points, I'm in broad agreement with most of them.Okay, can you tell me where the IAF went wrong and what they should do to improve that?
SAMs don't exist yet. And the IAF will tell you to give them more fighters, which they have been for the last 25 years.
What's the objective? What are we going to attack?
Why is the window only 2 days?
What happened on Feb 27 , that is a 24 plane attack will Happen AGAIN , next time there will be Attacks at 2 or more places
It is our Job to be able to Thwart it And then
Escalate the whole thing to the next level
That is why I am saying , there is no point in attacking Balakot like places
We should directly attack Military bases and installations
Our opening attack should be at Military Targets
I tell you what is the problem of Pakistanis. Till 2010 Pakistanis were fighting American war in Afghanistan and now because you have a new master which is China you are fighting their war with India.
Indian aircrafts could have struck in Lahore aswell it's only 35 kms from the border. But Mansehra is a place from where Chinese cargo from Gwadar will be en-routed to western province of China, it's a CPEC corridor site. By now ISI analyst would have got it but can't say openly because it would be a political turmoil.
India knows that Pulwama was a Chinese plan making fool out of Pakistanis. And getting one of the Pakistani Pilots killed by Pakistanis on 27th and many soldiers in the aftermath on cross border skirmishes.
Chinese are making you consumers of their goods by giving you loan to use their service to develop infrastructure for themsleves where Pakistanis will work and in return Pakistan has to pay interest to chinese. I mean who on earth signs such a foolish deal?
Because China can't directly involve with India, nor India
If we do tremendous damage to PN, the Chinese will cover the damages. 4 Chinese frigates are just $1B and 4 subs are even less than that. The Chinese can raise 1 PN every year without affecting their own modernisation. In exchange, half the IN will get tied up in the Arabian Sea instead of postring against the Chinese in BoB and the SCS.
This is a political call. Modi & Doval for all their bluster don't seem keen to go down this path. I understand their hesitancy and partially endorse their narrative too.This is what even @Falcon was pointing out, when he said all we need to do is funnel some money towards proxies in Afghanistan. This can drastically reduce our own defence spending. This is what Pakistan is doing to us.
It can be interpreted this way too but it's a cost. Coming out of their share of US aid.It's only a delay, not a cost. Equipment that was supposed to be bought now will simply be bought another time. In India projects are delayed so badly, that the small delay Pakistan faces is of little consequence to them.
You should share your ideas with Babaji
He will take it forward
Ask him for a E mail address
Chinese assistance is highly over rated
They are sucking them dry economically
And you think they will finance all ships for free
I think @STEPHEN COHEN beat me to it. While I don't agree with all his points, I'm in broad agreement with most of them.
Because after 2 days Pakistan will start their usual Crying and Telephonic calls
By the way did you see any appetite in Pakistan for an escalation after Feb 27
Escalation is a bogey , Pakistan gets scared when you start hitting them regularly
The Objective is of course military targets
Balakot terror camps are meaningless
Pakistan does not want either a Conventional conflict or a nuclear conflict
They only want to use proxies
But when they start loosing Military assets , they come to their senses
What do you think I want the IAF to do?Nothing what he said there applies to what you want the IAF to do.
Please refer to how we got to this post of yours. You've been claiming that China would supply ships & subs free of cost to PN. Now you're spinning it in something else. 2 very different topics.Kindly do not conflate issues.Don't force me to quote mine & your posts at this time of the night.
That's not what "objective" means. What do you think will be gained by doing this?