Mostly yes, in their narrativeThese are not "assumptions".
In combat, the primary goal is to achieve objectives. Did PAF achieve their objectives or not?
Mostly yes, in their narrativeThese are not "assumptions".
In combat, the primary goal is to achieve objectives. Did PAF achieve their objectives or not?
This is being peddled by only one guy and no one is agreeing with him.Soon someone will call you an Indian, watch out.
btw whats the count on PDeF these days? last time I checked it was some 8 iaf jets including mig 29s, su30s and mk2s
'We did not expect PA to announce the strike' - what do you mean Sir? And even after they announced the strike, we could not imagine that they would attack in broad daylight.Balakot was a bit different. We did not expect PA to announce the strike. But they did. Next time we will not keep quiet and will do it even better.
We had very well imagined retaliation from them and it was for this reason that we had aircraft on CAP and all radars staring deep in Pakistan. They came in broad daylight because the aim of the mission neccesitated it. Their aim was to strike Brigade HQ and weapons dump and cause max casualties. These places have least manpower at night and morning 10am was the right time as max number of personal would have been present in these places.'We did not expect PA to announce the strike' - what do you mean Sir? And even after they announced the strike, we could not imagine that they would attack in broad daylight.
You had said that an F-16 went down, for which there is no conclusive proof. The official narrative from Pakistan is of no F-16 loss.Today I received my first negative rating on PDF.i told them we don't have any proof of su-30 kill and this is the reason for negative rating.lol
Problem is they are sure that su-30 went down but no f-16.i asked them what is more important? Radar data or statement? They gave me negative rating on that comment.i hope we will find out the real story.anything is possible.In PDF,Oscer dude mentioned that no f16 was shot down but may be a mirage iii,as it was questioned by The Deterrent..In early days post balakote...So clearly assumed that paf lost an aircraft that day{pakistani opinion},but We know it was an F16,your pride
Incorrect.
The intent, as very clearly put forth by ACM Tipnis, was to "drop" a couple at AFBs of Srinagar and Awantipore. They were the primaries. The secondary targets were army formations nearer to LC. The PAF did not achieve the primary. So, a switch to secondary was undertaken.
And contrary to the self appreciating posts prevalent in Social Media of Indian COAS being at the Brigade HQ, nothing could be further from the truth. If the targeting was required to be done, it could have easily been done with the Artillery Systems already existing within your Area as of today. Or even a stand off strike from well away from LC by your Aircrafts could have been done. Think this one out.
Time starting from 21st June till 11th August is very bad for Pakistan and a war can easily break out.
True. But wars - short or long aren't fought on sentiments alone. You need money , material and trained personnel for it. Let them be as United as they can be. And let's see what this unity throws at us. Post 27th Feb, we had the perfect alibi to target their military installations and the GoI backed out. No matter. Pakistan being what it is will present us with many such opportunities in the future. Hopefully this GoI and our armed forces won't squander such opportunities.
We were not in position as our SU-30MKI were at lower levels. The R-77 envelope has been posted here manytimes. You can see that it has poor range while engaging targets flying above it. PAF chose its time and place. In any future battle, we too will chose our time and place. After 27th a serious escalation was a nearly done thing. But returning WC Abhi cooled things a bit.@vstol Jockey had replied to one of my posts saying that we were not in a position for an air-battle because of our R-77s - hence the rumours of the threat of missile strikes. Possibly a serious escalation of the situation was also undesirable
Pulwama happened on 14th, IN had localised this sub before balakot and by 4-5th Mar we were in a position to sink it. The 5-6th March strikes happened after that as we were now fully sure of taking out complete Pakistan in case of serious escalation. Pakistan backed off. We tried many more acts to force them into retaliation but they just kept quiet. Athmuqam was where we took out two APCs killing a Brigadier and two cols of PA. Than we took out three of their MBTs opposite Jammu. We took out their ammo dump opposite Akhnoor and then Tarbela. And they kept quiet.Pakistan is a tough opponent mainly because they are deluded fools who never accept defeat..
Now look at the latest news about IN on an extensive search for PNS Saad.. India finally tracked it down after 21 days.. Indian Navy had confined the PN to the Makran coast ( Official statement of IN virtually signifying a blockade..). The chumps could not send a single ship to their Iron brother China naval review for the chicoms 70th anniversary.. Indian Navy never boasted about this... But just read pakistani newspapers about the PNS Saad incident, and they making a virtue of it... Hell, even if in a future limited war, an Indian IBG ingresses 5km into pakistani Punjab, and captures a 100 sq. Km... The Pakistanis would still say that they stopped the Indian war machine just 5 Kms into pakistan and celebrate Pakistan Defence day II..
If I remember correctly, Their were three floors and the penetrator needed to explode on the ground floor after going thru three roofs. nearly everyone was in the ground floor.
Sir this is what you said in post #8969 - 'But the intruding F-16s were at a level lower than even MKIs. And MKIs could not even get a shot at them.' So i infer that the R-77s are bad compared to the C5s.We were not in position as our SU-30MKI were at lower levels. The R-77 envelope has been posted here manytimes. You can see that it has poor range while engaging targets flying above it. PAF chose its time and place. In any future battle, we too will chose our time and place. After 27th a serious escalation was a nearly done thing. But returning WC Abhi cooled things a bit.
So in your opinion, damage at Balakot was minimal?View attachment 7652
IAF to change missile-firing procedure to ensure video feed in Balakot-like operations
You still think sir that a special penetrator bomb was needed to penetrate a tin roof and a concrete roof?
No concrete roof can stop 1200kg bomb from that height, this story of using Spice 2000 seems to have been created to avoid embarrassment when third party pictures are released and no damage was seen.
I suggest that instead of asking me this question, you please read up a bit about time delay, penetrater and impact fuses. That will ensure that you need not ask these questions.View attachment 7652
IAF to change missile-firing procedure to ensure video feed in Balakot-like operations
You still think sir that a special penetrator bomb was needed to penetrate a tin roof and a concrete roof?
No concrete roof can stop 1200kg bomb from that height, this story of using Spice 2000 seems to have been created to avoid embarrassment when third party pictures are released and no damage was seen.
Sir this is what you said in post #8969 - 'But the intruding F-16s were at a level lower than even MKIs. And MKIs could not even get a shot at them.' So i infer that the R-77s are bad compared to the C5s.
I see.They intruded when MKIs were evading the incomi ng C5s