India - Pakistan Standoff 2019
- Thread starter nair
- Start date
- Status
I am of the opinion that an enemy is best dead and finished. I do not support the idea of a strong and prosperous Pakistan. A dismembered Pakistan will not be a problem for India. I had written about it. Most of the terror is confined to KPK and north Punjab. That too is partly due to Pak Army and ISI. If we annex Sindh and keep Balochistan as a protectorate, whatever is left of Pakistan will never be a problem for us. Please remember that Pak punjab is home to 65% population of Pakistan. Sindh is relatively a peaceful place and problems in Balochistan are due to insurgency.
Its not like they are not trying to do that anyway. I believe we have already faced full brunt of what PA/ISI, local Jihadi population can muster and have came out on top. The only thing stopping them from increasing their activity is their weak economy and instability in their country. As long as Pakistan exists as a country, it will always oppose India. It will always be a threat. We can't keep doing the same thing again and again and hope for a different result. A conventional victory in 1971, surgical strike, APS massacre, countless terror attacks by TTP, Balakot, Kargil. Nothing changed them. Pakistan as a country has been drilled from birth into believe India being the "eternal enemy". Destroy Pak, divide Pak into 4 pieces, and watch them quibble and fight amongst themselves.
Javani mein sir apki pakka koi sindhi gf rahi hogi jiski shadi nahi hui apse ab purey Sindh se badla
By the way, the sindh nationalism was there, and then guess what the establishment brought Fanne Khan Altaf bhai as MQM leader to suppress the Sindhi Nationalism. Otherwise plans were there. It's not that India might have not tried.
Yes. There are no two muslims countries anywhere in the world which live as ideal neighbours? Not even one such example. Plus once we divide Pakistan, No sindhi will even piddle in the direction of Punjab and vice versa.
Sindh is part of our National anthem. Sindh has to belong to us only.Javani mein sir apki pakka koi sindhi gf rahi hogi jiski shadi nahi hui apse ab purey Sindh se badla
By the way, the sindh nationalism was there, and then guess what the establishment brought Fanne Khan Altaf bhai as MQM leader to suppress the Sindhi Nationalism. Otherwise plans were there. It's not that India might have not tried.
A nice piece of article and interestingly substantiating my argument.
e.g you wrote "If the insurgent manages to dissociate the population from the counterinsurgent, to control it physically, to get its active support, he will win the war because, in the final analysis, the exercise of political power depends on the tacit or explicit agreement of the population or, at worst, on its submissiveness."
Well in 2019 elections the majority has shown the support to counter - insurgent even advocating to take further more hard actions. In several interviews the voters have conveyed the message that for them national security is top priority even if the country is certainly facing the problems of slow growth, unemployment and agrarian distress.
"
In any insurgency, the population is divided into three broad segments:
- The pro-insurgent minority.
- The neutral majority.
- The pro-government/counterinsurgentminority."
1- Pro counter - insurgent majority
2- Pro insurgent minority.
"Effective political action on the population must be preceded by military and police operations against the guerrilla units and the insurgent political organisations."
I agree. Even the government seems to abide by this rule. Remember that have first launched operation all out two times and only the took the political action in Kashmir
( abrogation of article 370).
Now since the Pro - insurgent groups in Kashmir are basically low tier members of the insurgent political organisations that is why again abiding to your aforementioned rule we need to take military and police action on the upper echelon of those organisations before any political actions. In our case this means we have to strike on Pakistan because it is the real insurgent organisation we face and after that we will take political action i.e dividing this country into 4 pieces etc.
I once again thankyou Sir for providing me this article which substantiated my point of view.
What are we going to do with radicalized Muslim population?
I think taking over Gilgit Baltistan is the only safe option. Huge real estate, beautiful, strategic(cuts China off from Pak) and very sparse population.
It is much easier to deradicalise them as they believe in their identity and have sindhi nationalism. They even today consider themselves to be the original Indians. POJK is what we need for sure to get a direct route to Afghanistan and central Asia bypassing even Afghanistan.
Their Sindhi and muslim identity can conflate and make them oppose us even more. Like in Kashmir.
No. It will not as most Mohajirs who created Pakistan are also in Sindh now and have realised their mistake. I can say with certainity that max sindhis will convert to Hinduism in very short time and so will many baloch.
I don't think your second point will ever happen but yeah a large mojahir population can be amenable to us.
How so? PoK doesn't have a border with Tajikistan, it's only Pakistan, Afghanistan and China.
Let's cross the bridge when we come to it. Right now, it's PoK that should be on our radars.With Chitral.A few years down the line, if we are successful in prosecuting our mission in PoK, with Afghanistan torn asunder in a civil war with the Pashtuns under the Taliban supported by Pakistan on one side and the Northern Alliance supported by Iran, Russia, etc on another side, a sudden crisis develops in East Asia much like the present one in HK, say in the Formosa Straits, the IA suddenly executes a seize & grab of the entire Wakhan corridor. Russia won't be pleased for certain but can be mollified. China's to be presented with a fait accompli. Of course all this is in the future.
Wakhan border can be part of swap deal with Afghanistan to disolve Durandline. Moreover you guys will be shocked to know that India does have a border of about 43kms with Tajikistan. I mean the border of J&K.
@randomradio, how is Russia involved in it?
As I stated the original J&K had that border with them and now part of China as they have taken that territory from Tajikistan. Between Wakhan corridor and China, we had this tip of Tajikistan touching the border with J&K state.
- Status