My post or this "Longewala" fellow ? How does our artillery compare to theirs today ?
His
Were these precision air strikes or precision artillery ? What were the weapons used?
Artillery. And no comments
My post or this "Longewala" fellow ? How does our artillery compare to theirs today ?
Were these precision air strikes or precision artillery ? What were the weapons used?
Not outgunned but out ranged, similar to how a 5.56 will outrange the 7.62x39. Range depends on the ability of the barrel to sustain the pressure, the Projectile design, the amount of charge. with a Heavier barrel, and additional charge even a 130 mm can be propelled as far.The 105 mm Indian Field Gun(IFG) ? That tiny little thing is out gunning 130 mm ? How ?
You still sure about the ATMOS being purchased ?
The advantage that the ATAGS brings will be eroded away if they don't come in time, that's what I fear. The Army's non-stop trials and delays in placing orders might work against them. Weren't 40 ATAGS ordered ? Anything new on that ?
We are going to need a lot more of those K9s to make up for our poor numbers in tracked SPHs. Any word on additional unit orders ? Have the K9s seen some action in the ongoing cross-border artillery fires ? Seemed like the perfect opportunity to try out new gear.
"Longewala" from Other Forum makes an excellent point :
"Apologies somewhat off topic but one thing that always made me nervous was artillery... In everything else we are superior to the Napaks 2-1 or more, but thanks to Congi scum and 30 years of under investment they actually had more 155mm pieces and SP than we have.
So it is a pleasant surprise to see us actually ourgunning them repeatedly despite the large calibre gap... which I presume is due to
1. Better, and home developed WLRs more suitable for mountains (which shows the benefit of R&D and army - scientists collaboration)
2. Better trained and professional artillery corps
3. Having money to buy ammo in the first place
4. Better maintained guns
5. Having more numbers of well directed and standardised guns, even if 105mm,
None of which reflects any credit on our napaki mughals btw"
I remember @Milspec writing about Pakistani artillery some very detailed long posts with colourful graphs and everything. Do those calculations still hold ? If so, how come we are outgunning them now ? Doesn't the addition of Dhanush and BMCS upset the previous equations ?
"Longewala" from Other Forum makes an excellent point :
"Apologies somewhat off topic but one thing that always made me nervous was artillery... In everything else we are superior to the Napaks 2-1 or more, but thanks to Congi scum and 30 years of under investment they actually had more 155mm pieces and SP than we have.
So it is a pleasant surprise to see us actually ourgunning them repeatedly despite the large calibre gap... which I presume is due to
1. Better, and home developed WLRs more suitable for mountains (which shows the benefit of R&D and army - scientists collaboration)
2. Better trained and professional artillery corps
3. Having money to buy ammo in the first place
4. Better maintained guns
5. Having more numbers of well directed and standardised guns, even if 105mm,
None of which reflects any credit on our napaki mughals btw"
I remember @Milspec writing about Pakistani artillery some very detailed long posts with colourful graphs and everything. Do those calculations still hold ? If so, how come we are outgunning them now ? Doesn't the addition of Dhanush and BMCS upset the previous equations ?
So OFB made IFG has heavier/better barrels than the Chinese/American supplied 122 and 130 mm in Pakistani arsenal ? Wow ! That was unexpected.Not outgunned but out ranged, similar to how a 5.56 will outrange the 7.62x39. Range depends on the ability of the barrel to sustain the pressure, the Projectile design, the amount of charge. with a Heavier barrel, and additional charge even a 130 mm can be propelled as far.
Read that already."Poor number" in SPH is being extremely generous. If you take the K9's recently inducted Indian SPH number stands a Zero. I had tallied the numbers a little while ago.
Indian Army Artillery Systems : News and updates
How come they are getting pounded by our atry every other day despite the numerical superiority ? Surely the propaganda machinery of Pakistan wouldn't stay silent if they were causing much damage to our side. They would be circulating videos on SM about it. Now what we get is : "The Endyians are lobbing mortars and shells on civilians" type stories. Not the usual bravado that would be associated with any action that Pak takes. Not to mention our casualty count would go up.Just add a few Dhanush and the initial batch of K9's other than that eveything else remain instact on the Indian side.
On pakistani side they got a big batch of 65 used SPH's from Italy.
Just add a few Dhanush and the initial batch of K9's other than that eveything else remain instact on the Indian side.
No, 130mm m46 is same spec as Russian. IFG and LFG are over engineered.So OFB made IFG has heavier/better barrels than the Chinese/American supplied 122 and 130 mm in Pakistani arsenal ? Wow ! That was unexpected.
How come they are getting pounded by our atry every other day despite the numerical superiority ? Surely the propaganda machinery of Pakistan wouldn't stay silent if they were causing much damage to our side. They would be circulating videos on SM about it. Now what we get is : "The Endyians are lobbing mortars and shells on civilians" type stories. Not the usual bravado that would be associated with any action that Pak takes. Not to mention our casualty count would go up.
How come they are getting pounded by our atry every other day despite the numerical superiority ? Surely the propaganda machinery of Pakistan wouldn't stay silent if they were causing much damage to our side. They would be circulating videos on SM about it. Now what we get is : "The Endyians are lobbing mortars and shells on civilians" type stories. Not the usual bravado that would be associated with any action that Pak takes. Not to mention our casualty count would go up.
As such it seems it benifits us more to not have Pak blacklisted by FATF but to have the sword of blacklist hang perennially over their head. Though that won't be possible. We'll see.They are right now silent because of UNHRC and FATF and restricted to non regulars only with light fire. It is expected that they will escalate after that. This is their plan. And the escalation will happen sudden where they will manage to inflict damage on Indian side in first as an element of surprize. They have assesed that what India can do and how to bring back situation to normalcy. Mark this post.
Wait! You mean to say they have assessed how to Make India retract on abrogation of Art. 370? It'sd not happening bro! Also, on the contrary, any escalation would shift the entire focus from Hr violations to Indo-Pak war and Pakistani belligerence! They did the same mistake in 65'. The minimum goal of doing 65' was to "internationalise" Kashmir and force India into a resolution! If anything it backfired.They are right now silent because of UNHRC and FATF and restricted to non regulars only with light fire. It is expected that they will escalate after that. This is their plan. And the escalation will happen sudden where they will manage to inflict damage on Indian side in first as an element of surprize. They have assesed that what India can do and how to bring back situation to normalcy. Mark this post.
achaa??
What about man power to operate, transportation of the equipment, extra logistic etc
It will take 1-2 months for this.
PM modi is doing good by keeping military busy other wise they were getting rotten in bunkers for nothing. They need extensive training on every new equipment at least 1 month real time.
How come they are getting pounded by our atry every other day despite the numerical superiority ? Surely the propaganda machinery of Pakistan wouldn't stay silent if they were causing much damage to our side. They would be circulating videos on SM about it. Now what we get is : "The Endyians are lobbing mortars and shells on civilians" type stories. Not the usual bravado that would be associated with any action that Pak takes. Not to mention our casualty count would go up.
Your in Kakinada?A mini CSD ....... yessssssssssss
A la Kakinada
These are my personal views based on my limited knowledge of ground operations but based on study of many past battles and a military thinking developed over a period of time. In my opinion a CSD with IBGs will be far more successful in present scenerios for following reasons,A mini CSD ....... yessssssssssss
A la Kakinada