even bhadoria said soCoincidentally, I had checked today with IAF retired officer on this and his inputs were, PAF was able to jam communications between IAF's controller & jet. That's where everything started collapsing. After this, no comments.
even bhadoria said soCoincidentally, I had checked today with IAF retired officer on this and his inputs were, PAF was able to jam communications between IAF's controller & jet. That's where everything started collapsing. After this, no comments.
The first point relates to the assumption that PAF would not fire BVRAAMs from their side of the LOC. The expectation since always was that they'd bait IAF aircraft into POK and try to execute a shoot down on their side. ROEs were formulated accordingly. Note: These were not new ROEs. Once the Radar controllers and Su drivers began to confirm that BVRAAMS were indeed launched across the LOC, the command went into a shell, not providing new ROEs to fighter crews who were by now caught up in engagement. Void of new ROEs and PAF ACs staying well within POK, GCI was constrained into asking IAF ACs into defensive positions.
Now nothing stops IAF from tossing BVRs across the LOC. Expect PAF to request that both sides revert to old ROEs soon, given Indian dominance in Air surveillence capabilities.
The next point relates to Su-30MKI & R-27/77 combo being outranged in a heavy EW environment. Why was this scenario not wargammed beforehand?
The intensive exercises and exchanges with IsAF, SgAF and even IAFs own evaluation of F-16 block 60 and AMRAAM AIM 120D/C-7 should have provided adequate information regarding the capabilities of this mix. In fact there is little doubt that key individuals knew about it. There should be volumes on this. The question is why was it not taken into consideration? Was the information classified? Was this information not included in upskilling Su Drivers?
This is the surprize what their army spokesperson was talking about. Intelligence failure and as well as assesment failure attributed to some officials in the Northern command. What if the intelligence might have got leaked from the Northern Command about India's assesment and PAF knew IAF was not expecting a BVRAAM combo.
Is that the only option they have? What about deployment of extra long range SAM batteries on the ground in POK. I hope IAF takes that into account as well.
Some one here can put light on it who is following their movements through media and all.
Valid points, rather they did not expect, while being overconfident and underestimating PAF' s retaliation. May be the lack of intelligence lead to such disastrous outcome.
SU30MKI in air and one of the Migs get shot while chasing an F16 and no SAM from our side lock down on any of the PAF even after they fired BVRAAM. Secondly it seems like we do not have SAMs in the proximity of LOC and they are only to secure the srinagar area. Or did we fire any SAM?
PS: Your post is very well organized , straight and to the point. Thank you for great and neutral insights.
How do you go to war for revenge against this entity? Kill soldiers you might say. They'll willingly cart a hundred thousand soldiers to their deaths. The PA never cared about it's soldiers. Cannon fodder would be an understatement of the degree to which an ordinary soldier is valued.
If you're planning to go to war with Pakistan, the motive can't be revenge. It can't even be teaching them a lesson. The objectives have to be strategic: destruction of key capabilities, the capture of territory
This OBSESSION with February is Absurd
IAF has made the Relevant and Necessary
Changes and Improvements , but people in
This Forum are still indulging in Hair Splitting
Even Pakistanis are " Realistically Awaiting "
The Next Round
They know it is a matter of WHEN and Not if
And they have played all their cards
It's not about obsession it is about accountability. Why every f******* time one has to remind that if PAF has become headache because of ROEs , then what about China. You think Chinese would be not analysing what happened on 27th?
So we should have by NOW
made have a Cell in IAF , TO
Re Examine all such ROE s , which will hurt us in Future
Sure, you are free to have your opinion and thoughts. But that rationale has no bearing on my opinions and thoughts. Since, the armed forces are so adamant at keeping the civilians out of the loop during such incidents, my opinions will be formed accordingly. If the leadership of this country has the same line of thinking then I guess having no expectations from the armed forces at all is the best solution here.Actually I'm in agreement with this specific comment that you've quoted. Though I am somewhat confused by the debate my comments triggered. My intentions were something else. Oh well.
War with Pakistan for the sake of avenging even a 1000 soldiers doesn't make sense. In fact any war aimed at avenging anything with Pak doesn't make sense, not from a tactical perspective and definitely not from a strategic perspective. The pointed reason is that Pakistan is an irrational state.
Pakistan, and PA in particular, has always been a nation of half truths and selective interpretation of the truth. It is a ideological entity which defines victory as merely not being destroyed. Cristina Fair got it absolutely right about the PA. It will always be victorious as long as it can avoid utter destruction, a degree of action we as a nation are unwilling to commit to. As such any military action, even crushing defeat, merely strengthens its grip on power within Pakistan and within the minds of the deluded citizens.
And by God are Pakistan is deluded, perhaps outside of Imperial Japan in 1940s, no nation has been this divorced from reality in the history of civilization. You only need to look at the Pakistani newspaper reports on FATF or any other global engagements mentioning Pak. You'll find the Pakistani reports are at 180 degree odds with the reporting in every other country. They've bought into their own propaganda and now live in a cocoon of their own truths. Reality be damned.
How do you go to war for revenge against this entity? Kill soldiers you might say. They'll willingly cart a hundred thousand soldiers to their deaths. The PA never cared about it's soldiers. Cannon fodder would be an understatement of the degree to which an ordinary soldier is valued.
If you're planning to go to war with Pakistan, the motive can't be revenge. It can't even be teaching them a lesson. The objectives have to be strategic: destruction of key capabilities, the capture of territory.
They believe That Now and Henceforth there will only be Limited Conflicts
Hey, I believe any death toll above 100 would, especially of armed forces, in case of IAF it can be as less as 20 pilots would be a casus belli for a wider range of actions. We almost reached that point on 27th hadn't they released Abhi. Please don't get me wrong, read my comment in unison with the other points I had made. We need to create a better arbitrage for reliably desirable results. Till such time there would be an element of chance in such short skirmishes.Sure, you are free to have your opinion and thoughts. But that rationale has no bearing on my opinions and thoughts. Since, the armed forces are so adamant at keeping the civilians out of the loop during such incidents, my opinions will be formed accordingly. If the leadership of this country has the same line of thinking then I guess having no expectations from the armed forces at all is the best solution here.
So, how about this-
From my perspective (this is coming from someone whose family member is a Wing Commander in the Air Force), if my family members or I join the armed forces and somehow a random jihadi manages to blow my body apart including lets say the death of those 1000 other soldiers you mentioned, should we expect no escalation to war? Whats the point of these deaths then? Will these armed forces escalate if and only if some criterion are fulfilled? Who sets these arbitrary numbers as redlines? Will 2000 deaths suffice? or 5000? Or next you are gonna say that since there is no objective to be achieved with war, we should let these deaths go. Imagine telling the families that their husband's/son's life is really not worthy enough to go to war. What is the incentive here to join the armed forces? You do realize the signal that you are giving to the civilians here?
I get your point that PA are irrational actors, but are you telling me that those 1000s of strategists still haven't found a way to humiliate PA? Alright, if revenge cannot be a motive then start capturing land for every death that occurs. Step by step start eating up POK for every terrorist attack they orchestrate. How about publicly displaying the dead body of every infiltrator? That must have a psychological effect on general pakistani populace. Start a propaganda campaign to show the pakistani civillians the dead bodies of their fellow countrymen laying on LOC. All we get is a pathetic video once in 2 years or so. The whole of Pakistan can't be irrational, right? How about letting modi go to a world stage like UNGA and start displaying thousands of photos/videos showing pakistani bodies littering the LOC
Since I am a civilian and I have no basis to give such lectures/sermons, I'll stop lecturing the armed forces on what to do and how to do it. Enough people are already being paid to devise such strategies. But the least I expect the whole *censored*ing system to do, is to avenge those deaths somehow and present some tangible proof of the same. But even that is too much to ask while being branded a traitor.
The fact is that we are a nation that is larger than pakistan by a magnitude of several times and we still couldn't make it too expensive for them to sponsor terrorism in India. If we have failed at deterring them then its our complacency not theirs. Your explanation that that they are irrational and its not our fault, seems to me, is the result of same warped mindset. If we are still willing to take a sucker punch to our faces and not willing to retaliate, we really can't blame them if they keep punching us again and again. Which self respecting nation would let the death of 1000 soldiers slide like that?(paraphrasing you)
Somehow, my extremely subjective and pessimistic opinion is that, what we blame the PA for, is the same problem we have. After all, armed forces are comprised of humans, and humans everywhere have the same weaknesses. Nobody is innocent. After reading the incidents about IB being complicit with kashmiri politicians for milking the central govt., maybe just maybe, some higher ups in our chain of command have vested interests in keeping this shitshow in a status quo. I hope to god that this isn't so.
rant over /s.
From my perspective (this is coming from someone whose family member is a Wing Commander in the Air Force), if my family members or I join the armed forces and somehow a random jihadi manages to blow my body apart including lets say the death of those 1000 other soldiers you mentioned, should we expect no escalation to war? Whats the point of these deaths then? Will these armed forces escalate if and only if some criterion are fulfilled? Who sets these arbitrary numbers as redlines? Will 2000 deaths suffice? or 5000? Or next you are gonna say that since there is no objective to be achieved with war, we should let these deaths go. Imagine telling the families that their husband's/son's life is really not worthy enough to go to war. What is the incentive here to join the armed forces? You do realize the signal that you are giving to the civilians here?
Success sir?
IAF should be reduced to some aviation club for air shows entertainment only. Their assets be given to much more competent IN and IA.
Frankly, we were not prepared for the second act.
We never expected PAF to fire from within their own territory. And we did not have many fighters like M2K and SU-30MKI ready and loaded with AAMs. We were on defensive CAP with no intention of retaliatory action in case of a strike by PAF.We were. We were not prepared to be sluggish though. That happens as not everyone is a brilliant combat mind on first instance.
We were. We were not prepared to be sluggish though. That happens as not everyone is a brilliant combat mind on first instance.
The pount brought out by @DivineHeretic is what I also stated just after 27th Feb. please read my posts of that time. IAF just went clueless with options and they did not know what to do? They not only failed misrably to analyse the build up of fighters in Pak airspace but when the battle started, they even failed to respond in a way whichwas supposed to be their copy book response. IAF was stunned by what PAF did, but I know from my days as a fighter pilot that counter strikes are done without waste of time and when such fprmations are returning for landing, they are to be targeted and destroyed. IAF did not launch any such counter strike and called their failure a success. What stopped IAF from such counter strikes and who could have stopped them. It was ther sheer incompetence and nothing else.
I just don't understand what were the assumptions on the part of IAF to arrive at such idiotic conclusions!We never expected PAF to fire from within their own territory. And we did not have many fighters like M2K and SU-30MKI ready and loaded with AAMs. We were on defensive CAP with no intention of retaliatory action in case of a strike by PAF.