The humiliation of being forced to return our pilot unilaterally under threat of war seems to have dented them,but some guys here are celebrating.This was not something to celebrate .Pros and cons that came out of this -
Pros-
1.We rewrote the rules of strategic engagement.Even if BJP is voted out of power,a congress govt will not have the ability due to popular pressure to resist a similar move on next terror attack,as opposition will compare and tear it apart.Pak army's bluff permanently called.This is the main plus.
2.We took out an f-16 with obsolete mig-21,speaks of IAF capability.We exposed Pakistani DG ISPR lies,first about 2 planes shot down and 2nd pilot in custody and 2nd about no f-16s.All but confirming f-16 shootdown.
3.Situation is still very tense and indian military is forward deployed .The world now sees us as not having escalated,but if there is another terror attack within a short time -s ay next 6 months,nothing remains to stop us from decisive action.
4.We might see quicker release for defence funds,particularly for airforce and army.
Cons -
1.We lost the information war,though it was somewhat made up by pakistan's unilateral surrender of pilot.IAF suffered a loss of prestige,even though in reality it likely performed superbly.It will now have to wait for its moment of revenge.Like we avenged 99 shootdowns in 2002,IAF has a long memory.
2.We lost a major oppurtunity to set back pakistani plans to sponsor terror .If we had caused major damage to their air installations and naval ships it would have caused billions of dollars of damage,damage that they couldnt have afforded with bankrupt economy.They would take years to rebuild while we could replace our losses very quickly.Before trying next big attack they would remember the pain,and wouldn't try any before their airforce was back up which would take years,if they tried anything in the meantime we would strike with impunity on camps from sky.
3.Again we proved we took too long to take the decision.Imran khan was able to preempt us and saudis and usa got involved.
4.While i believe we took down an f-16 and pak propagandist dg ispr was left with egg in his face,many are beginning to become skeptical of actual impact of balakot bombings.No satellite images,no images,independent sources saying no visible damage.Targets may have been missed or damage far less than first claimed.GOI should release bombing photos quickly to pacify the doubts of many indians and prevent opposition oppurtunists from denial.
Military lessons -
1. We need pre-prepared aerial mobilization plans and strike plans which can be issued and exercised within 24 hours.German general staff of ww1 and ww2 used to do this.Their entire military machine was so efficient it could mobilize 2 million men in 48 hours.We need to mobilize our airforce quicker.Land mobilization is much more costly and not needed,cold start is enough.
2.We need better SAM cover.Fighter jets need time to scramble ,one of the reasons we were forced to use mig-21 is because vulnerable forward airbases in kashmir tend to have low priority expendable fighters,and because it has good response time,also its largely useless unless used as a point defence fighter.Its good that tejas will replace migs,while s-400 and barak mrsam are coming too.Nonetheless i think at least one mig-29UPG interceptor squadron needs to be shifted to kashmir ,perhaps srinagar.The 21 mig-29s coming should replace the shifted squadron at adampur.
3.It is very possible that in future during action over pak skies our pilots may further be captured.It is necessary that IA have prepared localized plans to attack and capture some pakistani forward posts.Take prisoners and then exchange them for pilots in old fashioned honourable way.
4.Since naval movements take time,navy should be kept in loop from beginning and minute terror attack happens should be called upon to be ready to strike .As soon as we strike their targets inside pak,they will try to retaliate.Here navy should already be forward deployed.It shouldn't be that u do a tri services chief meeting and then navy goes ahead.Meeting should only be to decide on attack or not.An offensive posture by navy is guaranteed to spook the Pakistanis,tehy know they have no defense against our huge fleet,no defense against brahmos,they know a ship lost is 200-500 million dollars and hundreds of sailors - catastrophic loss.And they know karachi holds their oil storage as well as bulk of their GDP.And they also know if IN comes from sea their airforce will be hopelessly stretched making it easier for IAF to break through.
5.We need all aircraft within 600-700 kms of pak in hardened shelters.Only way pak can strike deep into our main airbases is cruise missiles in an all out aerial shootout.SAMS,aaa and hardened shelters hould be combined to minimize effect.