The unemployment is just capturing more of the persistent underemployment that has been hallmark of Indian labour scene a long time now.
Glad better standards are being used now by NSSO. Mind you they need to keep reforming this and improving on it....maybe 20% of labour is formalised/salaried at best.
And then this rubbish media compares it all apples to apples with the earlier crappier standard (which meant squat to begin with) and says "surge"...lol.
Joblessness at 45-year high, but NSO adds a caveat | India News - Times of India
The report released on Friday by the National Statistics Office (NSO) said the new labour force survey needs to be seen as a new series for measuring employment and unemployment on annual basis.
“This is a new design and uses new metric and it would be unfair to compare it with the past,” Pravin Srivastava, the country’s chief statistician told reporters while releasing the report, a day after the Narendra Modi government was sworn-in. He denied that there was any political pressure to delay releasing the report.
==========
Really disappointed in choice of FM. BJP govt needs a world class economist & fast.
I don't think you understand what a FM role is. The "economists" work underneath...its best their names are not known.
The last thing India needs is a "world class" economist as a FM or PM. 10 years were thrown down the drain last time....because of silent "world class" type just saying "yes ma'am" to some waitress lady....instead of using the hot money boom to take at least some incremental reform on labour and business and investment norms.
==========
Who here will deny that our economy isn't in the best of health or that the banking sector is severely stressed or that the NBFC sector is on the verge of collapse or that agriculture isn't providing sustainable income or that labour reforms are urgently needed or that exports are falling since the last 5 years or that land reforms ought to a priority too?
Has Indian economy ever been "in health" in modern memory?
This is just another inflection point for ICU recovery (from centuries of pilfering and ransacking by foreigners) like any other.
How is NBFC on the verge of collapse? Credit scene is sensitive to NBFC performance...doesnt mean "collapse". Its a cycle that will be ridden out after being stabilised from a few shocks.
Look, Modi tried something big with formalisation (demonetisation and GST)...and now the follow up reforms have the mandate.
This is far far superior to having UPA do nothing for 5 years, let a massive asset bubble form (because status quo stronk! dont kick anything!) and then have it implode all over the place and then divert federal funding to supply side subsidies for the next 5 years.
Don't know where the exports are falling for 5 years is coming from:
Exports of goods and services (current US$) | Data
Exports hit record in FY19, surpass earlier FY14 peak - Times of India ►
It's about the best one could hope for given the absolute wreck inherited from UPA.
Too many of you follow each and every number as though this is some constant series of data (when there are major breaks and even questionable applicability given India is just entering another phase of economic volume per person) and constant standard reference with other countries too (which follow far different models - some neutral economists for example say a full half of China's growth figures are unsubstantiated).
What matters is the broad reforms (govt retreating and focusing on what its "economic" role is) to give the Indian economy the best chance at using broad-spectrum stuff (data, tech, information, capital) to improve itself with more efficiency. It was allowed to happen only partially for 10 year UPA admin...Modi is kicking it to another gear now. People get this deep down...and also different numbers have different relevance to their living condition.
Simply ask why Indian economy growing in USD terms by 30% one year (I think it was 2007) under UPA produced utterly nothing relevant in capex for rural distress the same UPA says only created/surged now? But Modi with 4% inherited base growth (at best)...creates toilets and gas connections for rural folk? - Something that should have been done back in the 60s and 70s? What exactly arrived in the tech scene under Modi that UPA couldnt have done to create direct benefit transfer system for any subsidy program instead of just paying producers big lump sums (and thus benefitting the biggest consumers rather than the poor - exacerbating the asset inflation in the end). You tell me which economic "growth rate" was better in the end? The govt can increase growth rate to 10% or even higher right now...but actual people will suffer a tremendous amount for it.
Growth rates and employment rates only mean so much when their own defintion/standards/computations were somewhat meaningless before and are improving/reforming now....illustrating deep set problems better.....but the people doing the reforms get the stick for showing the reality?...and then people compare as a constant series (with no context) on top of it? If it was so bad, Indian people are that stupid to vote the same guy in? Or occam's razor suggests that the "numbers" only apply so much to the actual macro-reality on what economics even is fundamentally about (no it is not a "GDP" thing at all).
The biggest modern economic expansions of the world in history came also with the largest noise and criticism (by cherry picking whatever negativity).....where such a thing was allowed (you can look at what the news were like in the western world which had democracy and freedom of the press during the 19th and 20th centuries for their major economic expansion periods....it was all about unemployment, things shutting down, people in distress, people exploited etc etc...simply thats what can sell the most headlines). Its all part and parcel of being a democracy.
As long as Modi and his team do the best they can with what they got...I'll be happy. The first term was good...and lot now rests on this term to prove it more.