Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion

And it has been developed by drdo ( which i forgot to add )


Quality not quantity is the hallmark of any company except for certain PSUs and all OFBs.

VEM has its fingers in many weapon systems under production or in development.

Eg the NG-LGB is mostly their product , i posted the pic in D F I sometime back.

Also if i am correct they will be the ones to co develop the rocket artillery system for mountains.

I wasn't doubting their quality of work. I was wondering how come there has been no union politics/dharna type drama for this yet. Too early maybe.
 
Model of an unknown missile which i believe is the XRSAM

Launcher is 6 celled on a 6x6 trailer

I am guessing surface to air missile due to the presence of long chord wings ( which is used to implement high maneuverability ) and immediately followed by folding short fins as control surfaces for additional maneuverability / controllability , interestingly a large section of the immediate rear section is bare of any control surfaces. Quite intriguing design.

Also I don't think it is the AD series interceptors due to the obvious aerodynamic design configuration. Hence the only possible option remaining IMO is the XRSAM.

kl.JPEG

jkk.JPEG

jj.JPEG
 
Model of an unknown missile which i believe is the XRSAM

Launcher is 6 celled on a 6x6 trailer

I am guessing surface to air missile due to the presence of long chord wings ( which is used to implement high maneuverability ) and immediately followed by folding short fins as control surfaces for additional maneuverability / controllability , interestingly a large section of the immediate rear section is bare of any control surfaces. Quite intriguing design.

Also I don't think it is the AD series interceptors due to the obvious aerodynamic design configuration. Hence the only possible option remaining IMO is the XRSAM.

View attachment 11061

View attachment 11062

View attachment 11064

A derivative of Maitri project?

vl_mica_dga.png

MICA-VL
 
mmm.JPEG

Mica vl launcher is on a 3x3 vehicle

Which is comparable to this launcher currently under development

9260569_1_jpeg83b5009e040969ee7b60362ad7426573.jpeg


But compared to the unknown missile ( XRSAM ? ) trailer based 6x6 trailer based launcher with integrated DG set and control cabin , one realises the unknown missile ( XRSAM ? ) is a totally different system. Also note the retracted plume deflector shield in the rear. Plume deflectors are usually employed in long range missile launchers due to obvious reasons.

jj.JPEG
 
View attachment 11067

Mica vl launcher is on a 3x3 vehicle

Which is comparable to this launcher currently under development

View attachment 11068


But compared to the unknown missile ( XRSAM ? ) trailer based 6x6 trailer based launcher with integrated DG set and control cabin , one realises the unknown missile ( XRSAM ? ) is a totally different system. Also note the retracted plume deflector shield in the rear. Plume deflectors are usually employed in long range missile launchers due to obvious reasons.

View attachment 11069
Makes sense. It could be XRSAM. N-SRSAM would be in early stage of development.
 
Model of an unknown missile which i believe is the XRSAM

Launcher is 6 celled on a 6x6 trailer

I am guessing surface to air missile due to the presence of long chord wings ( which is used to implement high maneuverability ) and immediately followed by folding short fins as control surfaces for additional maneuverability / controllability , interestingly a large section of the immediate rear section is bare of any control surfaces. Quite intriguing design.

Also I don't think it is the AD series interceptors due to the obvious aerodynamic design configuration. Hence the only possible option remaining IMO is the XRSAM.

View attachment 11061

View attachment 11062

View attachment 11064

Mostly likely XRSAM.........Above missile launcher is very similar (especially canister) to missile launcher for AAD

IMG_0351.png


In addition to plume design

1572450128753.png
 
Last edited:
What about Range
Winged version should be able to go over a 100 kms.

1572612662198.png
(The pic above is probably not the 1000 kg bomb, but the wings are possibly similar)

Non winged one should be ranged at around 20-40 kms.
1572613346050.png

Of course, we also have the PGHSLD under testing. The number of PGMs under testing is mind boggling.
1572612682277.png
1572612706205.png
 
Winged version should be able to go over a 100 kms.

View attachment 11084
(The pic above is probably not the 1000 kg bomb, but the wings are possibly similar)

Non winged one should be ranged at around 20-40 kms.
View attachment 11087

Of course, we also have the PGHSLD under testing. The number of PGMs under testing is mind boggling.
View attachment 11085
View attachment 11086

Next Conflict with PAF will involve many SEAD missions

Unless we suppress their SAMs and Radars
We cannot win
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FalconSlayers
Next Conflict with PAF will involve many SEAD missions

Unless we suppress their SAMs and Radars
We cannot win
Which is why we are focusing on developing, testing and acquiring PGMs of various kinds. The widespread adoption of LDPs point to the same thing. SEAD/DEAD type missions also require EW pods, AWACS, ISTARs, ARMs, LGBs, CBUs etc. All of which are either in service or under various stages of acquisition.
 
Winged version should be able to go over a 100 kms.

View attachment 11084
(The pic above is probably not the 1000 kg bomb, but the wings are possibly similar)

Non winged one should be ranged at around 20-40 kms.
View attachment 11087

Of course, we also have the PGHSLD under testing. The number of PGMs under testing is mind boggling.
View attachment 11085
View attachment 11086

AFAIK the first picture you posted is not a drdo PGM

It is a Chinese PGM produced by por...... under licence