Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion

Well aerodynamically very important, but for bare viewing for this thread probably the least interesting post. :sneaky:
Was this posted before? Never thought those control surface fins are really that big, got to be at least 1.5 feet or 2 feet in size. Saw in a video where that canted fin was being made in a machine. Its pretty huge, almost like a car window size.

p3.jpg
p4-big.jpgp5-big.jpg
 
Imp details

Total requirements: 5000 ATGMs & 500 Launchers

Production Rate : 1750 ATGMs/year & 175 launchers/year

Usage :- Plains & mountains till 5500 meters

Targets :- should be able to destroy enemy tanks, Armoured Personnel Carriers, combat vehicles, low flying helicopters

Service Life :- 15 years (25 Years extended)

Modes :- Top attack & Direct attack

Dimensions:- Less than 125mm dia
Less than 1.25 m in length
Less than 25 (missile & launcher combined)

Range :- Max 5 km+ , Min 200 meters for direct attack & 1.1km for Top Attack
So spike or atgm 5??
 
  • Like
Reactions: marich01
MMP 140mm so that's out
The Missile+ launcher weight should be less than 25kg too. I don't know much about the mmp. But it seems it will have a problem with that too.
One more thing, Army wants Commandar & Gunner to both be able to fire ATGMs simultaneously. So that's 2 ATGM launchers.
 
So far we have tested the CLGM after a brief timeout, and there is yet no sign of DRDO working hard on Samho. MPATGM on other hand is a MM project, and going full speed ahead. Several tenders, think we even got one with entire drawings of the article and propulsion doc. So would love to see if Samho really returns to the fold again.
 
So far we have tested the CLGM after a brief timeout, and there is yet no sign of DRDO working hard on Samho. MPATGM on other hand is a MM project, and going full speed ahead. Several tenders, think we even got one with entire drawings of the article and propulsion doc. So would love to see if Samho really returns to the fold again.
Range of MPATGM is much less than the requirements so, i dnt think it is desired. LAHAT or SAMHO seems to be fulfilling the requirements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marich01
Range of MPATGM is much less than the requirements so, i dnt think it is desired. LAHAT or SAMHO seems to be fulfilling the requirements.
true, vehicle mounted atgm would certainly want a higher range compared to manpad/atgm fired by normal soldiers. lets see what they get.