Indian Political Discussion

I agree with this piece Aravind.

It is shambolic that in our own country you guys every year have to actually ask for special permission for your yatra in Kashmir.

Why has the BJP not put an end to this BS the moment they came to power? Especially when they actually share power in the state with Mehbooba?

Jai Sri Ram

Har Har Mahadev

Jai Maharashtra

Jai Hind

Cheers, Doc

P.S. I hope you take my post in the right spirit and not as a poke.
Only such incidents will wake Hindus from Secularism stupor,.
Let it happen to achieve critical mass to uproot this so called Secularism.
 
Only such incidents will wake Hindus from Secularism stupor,.
Let it happen to achieve critical mass to uproot this so called Secularism.

There is no "incident" buddy.

Its become a practice. Year on year.

You do not have to go out of your way to finger them. But this is absurd.

Cheers, Doc
 
There is no "incident" buddy.

Its become a practice. Year on year.

You do not have to go out of your way to finger them. But this is absurd.

Cheers, Doc
And such scenarios will shake off the ideas of Secularism and make Hindus question what do they get by following Secularism.
It will only hasten demise of Secular parties and bring the genesis of Hindu Rasthra.
You need to taste Quinine to combat Malaria.
 
And such scenarios will shake off the ideas of Secularism and make Hindus question what do they get by following Secularism.
It will only hasten demise of Secular parties and bring the genesis of Hindu Rasthra.
You need to taste Quinine to combat Malaria.

But you did not answer my question about why BJP did not put a stop to this?

Were they powerless?

Was the mandate we gave them lacking in any way?

Were there Constitutional barriers tying their hands?

Cheers, Doc
 
But you did not answer my question about why BJP did not put a stop to this?

Were they powerless?

Was the mandate we gave them lacking in any way?

Were there Constitutional barriers tying their hands?

Cheers, Doc
I already gave you my answer,Hindus need a bitter tonic and a kick on their bums to shake off this Secularism.
BJP needs to let it happen, so the Secular Hindu discards Secularism forever. These jolts awaken people. That is why you see Secular parties playing Hindutva card now as they see the ground has shifted. More Hindus facing these threats,= More Hindus wanting Hindu rasthra.
We want to see a Lifelong change in attitudes of Hindus , not temporary issue based or election based changes.
The younger lot are already in Hindutva camp, these incidents will shake off the last vestiges of Nehruvian Secularism in the older lot and hasten end of Secularism.
Want a change lasting 1000 years, not looking for temporary gains.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Ironhide and vsdoc
I already gave you my answer,Hindus need a bitter tonic and a kick on their bums to shake off this Secularism.
BJP needs to let it happen, so the Secular Hindu discards Secularism forever. These jolts awaken people. That is why you see Secular parties playing Hindutva card now as they see the ground has shifted. More Hindus facing these threats,= More Hindus wanting Hindu rasthra.
We want to see a Lifelong change in attitudes of Hindus , not temporary issue based or election based changes.
The younger lot are already in Hindutva camp, these incidents will shake off the last vestiges of Nehruvian Secularism in the older lot and hasten end of Secularism.
Want a change lasting 1000 years, not looking for temporary gains.

But what happens if the BJP miscalculates and is booted out for not being hardcore enough in the interim.

After all generational changes take .... generations.

What happens if another party comes in and fills the void.

How would that fit into the long-term plan ideologically?

And what is the end goal of a Hindu Rashtra?

What form of governance is envisaged?

A Hindu Republic? A one party authoritarian rule like China?

What about our federal structure?

Can you elaborate on the end goal of the Hindu state please?

I am sure you realize that it is very in the realm of possible. Smaller nations have had revolutions and changed their entire form of governance and ideology. India with a billion Hindus can definitely build that sort of momentum.

Cheers, Doc
 
But you did not answer my question about why BJP did not put a stop to this?

Were they powerless?

Was the mandate we gave them lacking in any way?

Were there Constitutional barriers tying their hands?

Cheers, Doc


The BJP/RSS lacks political will, and is afraid of loss of image (which isn't so great either thanks to perception control of the ideologically biased mass media).

Contrary to popular opinion despite being labeled as the as some Nazistic-Fassistic party by the "left" leaning Media and Political opponents BJP is not a Hindutva Party, it is only perceived as one. It is mostly ssocialistic in approach with only a "Indian Component" in the thought process and is by no means a thought police kind of a political organization as the left front parties. I have lived in Bengal most of my years under red rule, so I know what political thought control/intimidation/ is.

And constitutional Barriers do exist like Article 30 and others. The Constituion of the Republic is Discriminatory to wards the majority Community.
 
But what happens if the BJP miscalculates and is booted out for not being hardcore enough in the interim.
There is no miscalculation, it is all in a phased manner, people know Rome was not built in a day. There is sufficient groundswell that will make it Impossible for Secular parties to win. That leaves with only one option BJP.

After all generational changes take .... generations.
It takes 10 years to teach and 20 years for the kids to reach adult age, where they become opinion makers and shapers of the Society.
Do you think the rise and popularity of Hindutva today was by accident or mistake? this was a strategy long due in process, what you see now were seeds planted 20 years ago. 10 years of direct rule will see accelerated growth.
What happens if another party comes in and fills the void.
Any party that comes to fill will have to walk in Hindutva or BJP shoes, only then can they even begin to think of filling anything, i don't see any leader who is going that route other than Modiji.
How would that fit into the long-term plan ideologically?
The strategy was envisaged long time ago,RSS was not a fool

And what is the end goal of a Hindu Rashtra?

What form of governance is envisaged?

A Hindu Republic? A one party authoritarian rule like China?

What about our federal structure?

Can you elaborate on the end goal of the Hindu state please?
Its all described in Savarkar and Golwalkars books. If you want to know more read Sita Ram Goel or Swami Aurobindo.

I am sure you realize that it is very in the realm of possible. Smaller nations have had revolutions and changed their entire form of governance and ideology. India with a billion Hindus can definitely build that sort of momentum
Not can Definitely, It is already happening, All these changes didn't happen randomly, it happened as per strategy.
 
A funny one from our brothers at Squint Neon..
Presenting, the Sidda RaMario!
1f923.png
🤣
1f923.png
🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dagger
But what happens if the BJP miscalculates and is booted out for not being hardcore enough in the interim.

After all generational changes take .... generations.

Specualtion on your part, BJP will be staying for sometime, Hindus are basically Dolts, they are not themselves not hardcore enough.

What happens if another party comes in and fills the void.

How would that fit into the long-term plan ideologically?

And what is the end goal of a Hindu Rashtra?

The Goal of Hindu Rastra is not of a religious or of an Ideological state, but a state the values its roots and has a "social/ Cultural order" not that of the Unitary party state. Essentially the blind mindset of Aping the west has made Indian institutions "na ghar ka na ghat ka." Our Universities to our work Culture in Inidan corporation to basic Civil attitudes all are just in shambles. If the Congress or the perceived left leaning parties of India are so great at governancethen why have we lagged behing even easrtn Europe and former Soviet States in social indicators. ?

What form of governance is envisaged?

A Hindu Republic? A one party authoritarian rule like China?

What about our federal structure?

Can you elaborate on the end goal of the Hindu state please?

I am sure you realize that it is very in the realm of possible. Smaller nations have had revolutions and changed their entire form of governance and ideology. India with a billion Hindus can definitely build that sort of momentum.

Cheers, Doc

The Political scene of India is not as simple and binary as the west, we are different and we are very complex. So if you want to have a discussion on India's polity the conventional notion used to express ideas as in the west have to be discarded and every thing has to be looked into its complexity.

Also, It seems, you have made assumptions that will be very hard to dislodge, and it forms a part of your cognitive ability so I wish to rescue myself from here. The moot point of having a discussion is to have the ability to entertain an Idea without accepting it. Hindutva is not what you perceive it to be and neither it is a stone age religious Ideology.

Cheers to you too Doc.

b57cb3fe060b4e365f4756e99b2b4287w-c215175xd-w685_h860_q80.jpg
 
Minorityism At Work: How A Delhi Church Tried Religion Card To Get Away With Encroachment
by Swati Goel Sharma - Mar 27, 2018, 4:40 pm
148SHARES
73545dfa-40b6-40ce-a8e0-22c61fb0bdbc.jpg
The Methodist Church in Mukherjee Nagar of north Delhi.
Snapshot
  • How the church cried foul over anti-encroachment drive by the civic body in New Delhi by claiming that the move was anti-Christian.
A church in New Delhi has levelled grave charges of religious discrimination on the civic body, alleging that it was singularly targeted in an encroachment demolition drive while an adjoining temple was spared.
Even though the church has since made a U-turn and is now calling its allegation a result of a "confusion" – details of which will come later in the story – it is to be noted that the church quickly escalated the matter to the minority commission alleging they were targeted with "ulterior motives". Not just that, the church also took it to global Catholic media, citing it as a case of "growing anti-Christian sentiments and propaganda".
Amid this, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) north assistant commissioner Santosh Rai, who found himself at the receiving end of the communal allegations, has expressed his displeasure with the conduct of the church, calling its management "nuisance creators" who “should have ideally been booked for hampering government work”.
c09420f4-d7e5-47a4-83a1-0276bfe76811.jpg
The church with encroachment removed. Photo clicked on March 26.
It all began on 15 March, when the civic body was carrying out its weekly demolition drive. Delhi High Court has identified 29 zero-tolerance zones in the capital city and ordered all encroachment to be razed down. The lane on which the Methodist Church stands, in Dhaka area of north Delhi's Mukherjee Nagar, falls under the Civil Lines zone of north MCD.
Bulldozers started demolishing encroachment at around 2 pm and reached the church area by evening. The next in line was the Om Narayan Dutt Temple.
According to Public Works Department (PWD) junior engineer D C Jaiswal, as bulldozers reached the church and began to demolish a raised cemented pavement illegally built by it, members of the Christian community gathered and began protesting. The civic body wanted to further raze down the illegal steps and the grill that the church had built, but protests delayed the work and by 5.50 pm, the drive was wrapped up for the day and the team left.
The next drive would happen five days later, on 20 March.
22da9cc6-e6c6-4377-8cbb-90594f822465.jpg
The temple stands just after the church. Photo clicked on 26 March
In the intervening period, the church went to the Delhi Minority Commission (DMC) and complained that no notice was served to them and that it was done "intentionally". In the complaint to the minority commission, a copy of which is with Swarajya, the church pastor-in-law N C George alleged, "...there are still certain encroached visible structures adjacent to the church which was deliberately ignored. We being minority, feel that the Church has been targeted and was harassed by this illegal act at the time of our festival season." (Passion Week began on Sunday and Good Friday is on 30 March). George is also the president of the Global Council of Indian Christians (GCIC).
DMC member Anastasia Gill visited the site shortly after the complaint on 15 March and concluded that there was discrimination and told as much to a newspaper, "I visited and inspected the site and believe that this is a discriminatory practice. It has disturbed religious sentiments and is an attack on the Christian community. The rights of the minorities are under threat. The area outside the temple next door has not been touched. Is the system working towards maintaining harmony or disturbing it?” She also served a notice to north MCD and the police demanding a reply by 6 April on the allegations made by the church.
It is to be noted that the original complaint by the church to minority commission did not talk about the temple being untouched. However, in statements to the media in the following days, George repeated Gill’s observation and said that they were targeted while a temple was spared.
These allegations were refuted by Rai, who told Swarajya that no notice is needed to be served in these cases as the orders have come from the High Court.
He said, "there were a few structures we encountered before the church that could not be demolished on the same day. Those were built with thick mortar and the bulldozers could not destroy them. I was informed about the issue and had ordered the team to bring JCB machines on the next drive to deal with it and that was done."
"There is no religious angle to this. This is no conspiracy," Rai said.
A visit to the site, conversation with locals and temple authorities, along with photos and videos of the episode, seem to support Rai’s account.
PWD official Jaiswal said that the drive had to halt at some point that day and it so happened that it stopped just before the temple. “All work can’t be completed in a day,” he said, and added that the temple authorities, in fact, had already begun razing down their part of the encroachment (on March 15) as they saw the bulldozers in action.
This account is supported by locals. A shop owner opposite the temple who witnessed the drive, said, “the temple began breaking its piaoo on that same day itself (on 15 March). By the next day, they had completely brought down the piaoo. When the JCB came (on 20 March), they only found rubble. So how can we say the temple was spared?”
Temple trust member Vijay Chhabra said that when he saw the drive, he informed the civic body that he would himself destroy the illegal piaoo (a free service providing drinking water to passersby) before the next drive and promptly deployed men on the job. "Bulldozers usually end up doing more damage, so we decided to remove the encroachment ourselves," he said, adding that the temple had organised a langar (free food stall) on that day.
In any case, on 20 March, the civic body returned with JCB machines and demolished the church steps and cleared whatever was left in front of the temple. However, not before the members of the Christian community again gathered to disrupt it. Rai shared a video of the day on WhatsApp that shows them raising slogans of 'Santosh Rai haye haye' and protesting the demolition.
Photos of the second drive on 20 March (below) show rubble placed outside the temple even as the church steps are intact. According to Rai, this is “proof” that the allegations of the church are false that the temple was spared while they were targeted.
965b2cd6-1600-437b-90ec-b4afb90b77e4.jpg

a892a91d-3e8f-4718-88ab-c3dd83fa8b8c.jpg

A miffed Rai told Swarajya, "the church management was such a nuisance. They gathered and raised slogans against me. They tried to assault us. They didn't let us work. In fact, such a conduct merits an FIR for obstructing work.”
dddbff4a-a4ec-47cd-ab7e-31808031acde.jpg
Piaoo outside the temple stands demolished. Photo clicked on 26 March
Curiously, when contacted on 26 March, Gill said that she believes that it was only after her intervention that the civic team returned on 20 March and asked the temple to remove encroachment.
The episode raises several questions. Does demolition of illegal encroachment mean "harassment" as alleged by the church as well as the minority commission? If the bulldozers left some structures un-demolished, is it to be promptly concluded that they were "deliberately ignored"? Was it appropriate for the church management to present the incident to a global Catholic media agency in such harsh words: "This discriminatory demolition highlights the anti-Christian hostility and the aggressions and intimidation suffered by the tiny Christian community"? Notably, the church further told this press agency that “this demolition, during this holy period for the Christian community, hurts the religious feelings of the community and reinforces the growing anti-Christian sentiments and propaganda."
The episode reminds one of 2015, when many churches in New Delhi had come up with a conspiracy theory, alleging that they were systematically targeted in hate crimes by right-wing bodies. Police probe in most cases, as pointed out in this report, showed that the allegations lacked merit as most incidents were petty acts of burglary sans a communal agenda.
These "attacks" were followed by the alleged gangrape of a nun in West Bengal and the Catholic Bishops Conference of India (CBCI) took no time to conclude it as a hate crime. Various Christian bodies called it yet another attack on minorities after the Narendra Modi government came to power. It later turned out that far from being a Hindutva foot soldier, as the CBCI, the media, commentators and the opposition had alleged, the alleged rapist was a Muslim and, that too, a Bangladeshi. In fact, the gang-rape theory was discredited by the court.
An article in Swarajya had then appealed to the two cardinals in India – Baselios Cleemis and Oswald Gracias – to apologise for communalising the West Bengal incident and levelling false allegations against the BJP and the National Democratic Alliance government.
The apology never happened.
Coming back to the latest incident in Delhi, George told this to Swarajya when asked about the incident, “there was a confusion. Now we have no objection”.
One wonders if the church will retract its earlier statement against the civic body and cries of "anti-Christian sentiments and anti-Christian propaganda" at work?
 
@vsdoc

Congress Was Client, Says Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower In Testimony

Christopher Wylie, the whistleblower at the heart of the Facebook data breach scandal, has named the Congress as one of the clients of disgraced research firm Cambridge Analytica, accused of accessing user data illegally for political campaigns.

It does not matter buddy. To my mind, there is nothing illegal about it, unless the Congress (or the BJP before it) explicitly knew that the data had been obtained illegally.

Unless they make a law (and manage to pass it) that outlaws CA, I hope the Congress uses their services to maximum advantage in 2019.

Cheers, Doc
 
Specualtion on your part, BJP will be staying for sometime, Hindus are basically Dolts, they are not themselves not hardcore enough.



The Goal of Hindu Rastra is not of a religious or of an Ideological state, but a state the values its roots and has a "social/ Cultural order" not that of the Unitary party state. Essentially the blind mindset of Aping the west has made Indian institutions "na ghar ka na ghat ka." Our Universities to our work Culture in Inidan corporation to basic Civil attitudes all are just in shambles. If the Congress or the perceived left leaning parties of India are so great at governancethen why have we lagged behing even easrtn Europe and former Soviet States in social indicators. ?



The Political scene of India is not as simple and binary as the west, we are different and we are very complex. So if you want to have a discussion on India's polity the conventional notion used to express ideas as in the west have to be discarded and every thing has to be looked into its complexity.

Also, It seems, you have made assumptions that will be very hard to dislodge, and it forms a part of your cognitive ability so I wish to rescue myself from here. The moot point of having a discussion is to have the ability to entertain an Idea without accepting it. Hindutva is not what you perceive it to be and neither it is a stone age religious Ideology.

Cheers to you too Doc.

b57cb3fe060b4e365f4756e99b2b4287w-c215175xd-w685_h860_q80.jpg
The toon was a killer. You should've added the caption - What's up doc ?
 
This is the present situation in Hyderabad., we Hindus fought for ourselves cutoff from Partition and all the horrors we faced.
So don't tell me what it is the face it at front of a battle line, unlike this @vsdoc Who faced none