Don't bring in nonsense here. PIL for Viraat was not answered for example. Also, what PIL will you put? What is the objective here? The same PIL can be filed for various policy paralysis, environmental clearance, delays in clearing manufacturing projects etc.ou are not, if there was a shred of evidence of treason, a simple PIL would have dragged guilty parties to court.
When did CAG issue any reason at all? CAG only said that there is a deficit, not about reason.When did CAG issue inadequate funding as an issue for Kaveri, why weren't there funding issues for other strategic projects?
Brahmos was made in 1998 and ready by 2003. Agni 3 was also made in NDA time. Only AGni-5 and K15 was developed which was nothing great. Agni-3 itself had 3500-5000km range. So, Agni-5 was an ICBM but not fantastic in nature. K4 was not made during UPA. Shaurya, Sagarika and K15 are the same and again was just 700km missile which is not a new technology. Making deign change is different from getting newer technology.And Nag has been in testing for more than two decades? Brahmos, Sagaraki, Shaurya, Agni Series, K4, all were sucessful programs, was UPA indulging in selective, Sabotage? or was it Diet Sabotage.
NAG was started before 2005 and the order of 443 missiles were not produced/ NAG seeker is made in India now but was imported earlier. What is the point of developing a missile with imported seekers? Is it development at all?
Where is selective sabotage here? Saying projects started during NDA time and continued till about 2006-7 (when Pranab Mukherjee was replaced by Antony) as done by UPA is absurd.
.
No that's not normal, its just more bull shit you are peddling.
When you can't answer my question, it becomes bullshit. Isn't it?
SARAS was a trial for bigger transport aircraft. SARAS itself was not needed but it is needed to develop into a big aircraft. So, unless an alternative is given, project can't be grounded. Just because there was a crash does not mean the aircraft itself is not needed. Do you expect military to transport goods by railway during emergency?Absolutely, that system was not needed and NAL made a horrible design killing the entire crew of the aircraft. Even today Saras is not a priority project.
No one can prove that it was CIA sabaotage. It is only a guess considering the source of NGO funding. Unless one can investigate into USA< it is impossible to say taht. However, the sabotage is real.It definately was a delay that impinges on National security, but that does not imply it was a CIA conspiracy.
What PIL should I file? Sabotage? For that I have to first get RTI for definitive proof of funding of projects as media statement will not cut it. The reason for delays have to be first asked before making any further accusation and one has to indulge in lot of procedures to come to this. I have no reason to waste my time with courts. We are all seeing how an obvious case for Article 35A which was issued by presidential order is being delayed. How National Herald case which is quite silly is being delayed. Do you think the PIL will get resolved quickly?LOL, how about this, take these evidences to a lower court, and file a PIL, witness the epic embarrassment. Post a video of the interaction if you can.
Incompetence is not proof of foreign involvement. Neither is NGO funding any proof. But the reason for delaying and sanctioning minimal funds for critical project is definitively a proof of sabotage. Incompetence does not come here as the MoD is not scientists who are doing the research. Not sanctioning funds for critical security needs itself comes under sabotage, regardless of the hands of foreign agency. The MoD did not do a mistake as there were requests for funds several times and it was not given.First thing, I am an athiest, I dont give a crap about your or anyone-else's god. Now the next sentences read slowly to get it through your thick skull:
You Claim Treason By UPA
You Also Claim Cover up by NDA.
Your proofs are delays in projects. Incompetence by MoD and PSU's is not proof of CIA's Manipulation.
Neither is NGO funding a proof of UPA's subversion of Indian Electorate Twice.... Repeat these sentence about 10 times. If still in doubt go to a lawyer and ask him definition of admissible evidence.