*Sigh* and this is why it's pointless discussing this topic with you, it's the same dead end every single day. So I'm gonna leave it at this - time is gonna prove you wrong.
Indian Political Discussion
- Thread starter Parul
- Start date
*Sigh* and this is why it's pointless discussing this topic with you, it's the same dead end every single day. So I'm gonna leave it at this - time is gonna prove you wrong.
Have you heard of STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
Given what Muslims did to his Community ; he is in THRALL of them
I doubt you've had any nuisance value from Parsis?
Yet I am (an ex Modi bhakt and very right wing) today opposing Hindutva.
Why am I doing it?
Is it because I am an inbred mad bawa?
Is it because I am a master troll yanking everyone's chain?
Am I secretly attempting reverse consolidation of the votes to favor Modi and his not so merry men?
Can you think of any possible reason a Parsi would have to hate Hindus or Hinduism (besides our ancient split)?
Cheers, Doc
Jesus H Christ man!
India today is united????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Cheers, Doc
Depends how you look at it, asides from right during/after Independence, when was it ever 100% united (and even at that time you can argue it wasn't)?
Nah, we are heading for a holocaust, and I am doing a blasphemy by denying it. Must be hanged once his highness resume office.
Ohh doc, I am off. You continue with your nth avatar. May you achieve your purpose.
Bhai, he is a Muslim convert Maratha POW who thinks he is "Iranic"
Son of an ISI General with a massive etitlement complex and leeway and license there.
Most importantly, one of the crotch scratching jaali topi and three fourth pyjama wearing soorma eyed jhopadpattis Im hoping you will not be.
Cheers, Doc
@STEPHEN COHEN
I must warn you for being abusive. No argument can justify abuse on the forum. You are free to have your opinion but in a respectable ways.
Take it positively.
I must warn you for being abusive. No argument can justify abuse on the forum. You are free to have your opinion but in a respectable ways.
Take it positively.
We aren't, that doesn't stop him from calling us polluted, Dirty Dozen and jhopadpatti types though...
Nah, we are heading for a holocaust, and I am doing a blasphemy by denying it. Must be hanged once his highness resume office.
Ohh doc, I am off. You continue with your nth avatar. May you achieve your purpose.
I wish there was a sad face reaction. Used the next best one.
Be good.
Cheers, Doc
Where ever you see a rule break, Please report and move on ......
I am sure you understand what i meant with that...... have been deleting lot of posts and replies, and it increases our work load, and also wastes lot of your time (i mean who ever are in conversation ).....
Go and talk to AIMIM members. They do believe that Hyderabad should not have joined India. Wait. You are from Hyderabad, right?? You should already know this.
I am sorry for that. And I am not being obtuse, but I really do not know what you mean.
The entire political discourse in the country today is Hindutva and anti Hindutva.
How can you have a meaningful political discussion thread if we have to keep off that?
Hindutva today is what's pissing people off.
As corruption and scams were pissing people off in the run up to 2014.
Could you have had a political discourse at that time without discussing the scams?
Then how are we (the other side) to have an even footing here if we cannot discuss Hindutva?
Please note, it is a serious question. Your forum and we are all here per your rules. Or not.
Cheers, Doc
If we go by a preconceived notion that BJP is only Hindutva, and their agenda is that...... Then you are right, But it again depends on the way you look at it.... It is never HIndutva vs anti hindutva as i see it, while agree a certain section is trying to do so, but today none of the action from the PM or his top ministers suggests so, But if one focus on fringe elements then yes........ Just like one look at Owaisi as a leader of secular forces, or Mani sankar aiyar as a person who may have leaning towards a nation which has always worked against you.... But in both the cases they do not represent the entire opposition, but they are part of it..... A Rw will only see these elements and highlights and as Anti RW you are focusing on the other part of it.......
Let us agree that we have not matured (at least most of the posters here) to discuss objectively,
I said the discourse nation-wide is Hindutva and anti-Hindutva.
Whether the BJP and its leaders are wholly or partially guided by this toxic ideology can be a matter of debate since actions can be explained and rationalized in different ways and none of us can really look inside their heads or are privy to their close-door discussions and meetings.
I believe they are. And most intelligent observers who are not Hindu do too.
For a Hindu, as I've said someplace earlier to @Arvind the lines might blur between spiritual Hinduism and political Hindutva. And one would understandably then have the innate tendency to try and defend it as non-malignant. Because nobody wants to believe that something toxic is emanating from and riding piggyback on one's dearly held faith and value system.
Now a majority of the members here are Hindu. As they are in our country.
You would also notice that the active anti-Hindutva voices here are at max 3 or 4. The others have either come and gone or are staying away.
Why?
Because the Hindutva voices here are more in number and loud. And fractious. And hostile. And often abusive.
By banning the discussion of Hindutva you are silencing those 3 to 4 remaining voices. And ensuring that Strategic Front becomes a Hindutva echo chamber. Instead of punishing abuse, you are trying to stifle one side so that the other does not abuse.
In essence you are guiding this place into becoming a Hindu PDF.
If so, and based on your decision, I am in or out.
Cheers, Doc
Last edited: