Not even close.
Be specific how they are better or it's just considered your opinion.
None of these ever tested in combat.
The F-15ex EW is more capable and more advanced that the french plane. Spectra isn't even an offensive EW and its AESA doesn't have EW capability I ca only imagine MKI being much worse in the EW realm.
The U.S. Air Force’s New F-15EX Fighters Could Double As Jamming Planes
The U.S. Air Force’s new F-15EX—a 21st-century update of the classic Eagle fighter—isn’t just
a potentially powerful, long-range shooter with plenty of underwing room for bigger air-to-air and hypersonic missiles.
It’s also a jamming platform. Fitted with the new Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, or EPAWSS, the twin-engine, two-seat F-15EX in theory could project a protective bubble of radar-muddling noise around itself and nearby warplanes.
In that capacity, the new Boeing fighter partially could complement the U.S. Navy’s EA-18Gs—the only dedicated radar-jamming planes in the American arsenal—and also partially and belatedly replace the Air Force’s
last jammer, the EF-111. The flying branch retired the swing-wing EF-111 way back in 1998.
The BAE Systems EPAWSS is a radio-frequency receiver and jammer. It detects enemy radars, determines their frequency and shoots narrow beams of electronic noise at them. That can clutter their screens and hide the F-15 and surrounding aircraft.
A radar-jammer is not new technology. EPAWSS however could be more effective than older fighter-size jammers are thanks to new algorithms that help EPAWSS automatically target enemy sensors.
The jammer’s usefulness is obvious. Chinese- and Russian-made air-defenses are getting more sophisticated and more numerous.
Fitted with the new Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, or EPAWWS, the twin-engine, two-seat F-15EX in theory could project a protective bubble of radar-muddling noise around itself and nearby warplanes.
www.forbes.com
F-15ex has an overwhelming chance surviving chicom IADS than IAF MKI or french plane.