Israel-Hamas Conflict: Updates & Discussions

BMD said:
Not really, it's right next to Murmansk and St.Petersburg. The Ukraine region is highly defensible too, they got Belarus for backup just above it, if they thought it wasn't defensible then they sure as hell wouldn't attacked it - that's the great paradox of your defensible argument. Another contradictory factor is that the land they've taken is the bit furthest away from the closest, direct line to Moscow. Your arguments make zero sense.

St. Petersburg is the 2nd largest city in Russia. The heart of Russia, i.e. Moscow is still a short throw from NE Ukraine, arguments not making sense again. You must not have heard about Stalingrad. The NATO start point could still be there because Russian holds no Ukrainian territory adjacent to Kursk. No logiic yet again, all fake arguments.
Click to expand...

Taking a city close to the border is irrelevant, both Napoleon and Hitler learned that the hard way. You have to destroy the opposing army in order to win.

And a city is a meatgrinder anyway. Finland is gonna get half its population wiped out just trying to take and hold St. Petersburg. The Americans are not gonna attack from that direction either. The casualties from the cold winter will be worse than the war itself.

So, no, Finland isn't a serious threat to Russia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetray and RASALGHUL
randomradio said:
Taking a city close to the border is irrelevant, both Napoleon and Hitler learned that the hard way. You have to destroy the opposing army in order to win.
Click to expand...
You're talking nonsense. Everyone would have nuked by then. Napoleon occupied Moscow, so what are you taking about?
randomradio said:
And a city is a meatgrinder anyway. Finland is gonna get half its population wiped out just trying to take and hold St. Petersburg. The Americans are not gonna attack from that direction either. The casualties from the cold winter will be worse than the war itself.
Click to expand...
We were talking about a hypothetical full-blown NATO vs Russia conventional invasion (not just Finland, which is like talking about a unicorn eating rocking horse sh1t anyway.
randomradio said:
So, no, Finland isn't a serious threat to Russia.
Click to expand...
You've got 3 countries near the border there. And like I keep pointing out, the part of Ukraine closest to Moscow is still there. This was never about fear of NATO invasion, that's just some BS Russia flogs to people who are thick as sh1t. In fact, it's so fcking stupid that I feel like my IQ drops 80 points every time I even entertain the idea for the purpose of discussion.
 
Last edited:
BMD said:
You're talking nonsense. Everyone would have nuked by then. Napoleon occupied Moscow, so what are you taking about?
Click to expand...

That he made the mistake of conquering the city instead of wiping out the Russian army, which directly contributed to his loss.

BMD said:
We were talking about a hypothetical full-blown NATO vs Russia conventional invasion (not just Finland, which is like talking about a unicorn eating rocking horse sh1t anyway.

You've got 3 countries near the border there. And like I keep pointing out, the part of Ukraine closest to Moscow is still there. This was never about fear of NATO invasion, that's just some BS Russia flogs to people who are thick as sh1t. In fact, it's so fcking stupid that I feel like my IQ drops 80 points every time I even entertain the idea for the purpose of discussion.
Click to expand...

Even in a hypothetical full-scale invasion, the north is still a fortress due to the difficult conditions.

Central Europe is still the go-to zone for invasions.

Your IQ was always low to begin with.
 
RASALGHUL said:
Bad move. Palestinians and hamas are different entities.
Click to expand...
There goes your freedom of expression but ................................you can still call for violence against other ppl like Indians by khalistanis or jihadis that is perfectly fine. No double standards there.
BMD said:
So what, the attack was clearly instigated by Russia. If they have to deal with violence anyway, they have nothing to lose.
Click to expand...
see's russia in russian salad and freaks out.
 
RASALGHUL said:
Bad move. Palestinians and hamas are different entities.
Click to expand...
Hamas are the government of Palestine. If they don't want Hamas representing them, they need to get rid of them. The people waving the Palestinian flags are predominantly supporting Hamas, they celebrated the initial attacks.
 
Last edited:
jetray said:
There goes your freedom of expression but ................................you can still call for violence against other ppl like Indians by khalistanis or jihadis that is perfectly fine. No double standards there.
Click to expand...
People who deliberately execute babies and rape children and film themselves doing it can't have any support.
 
randomradio said:
That he made the mistake of conquering the city instead of wiping out the Russian army, which directly contributed to his loss.
Click to expand...
This contradicts your original point wrt 'heart of Russia'. The winter defeated Napoleon, the Russian Army had little to do with it.
randomradio said:
Even in a hypothetical full-scale invasion, the north is still a fortress due to the difficult conditions.
Click to expand...
This is entirely imaginary and the whole NE of Ukraine is still open anyway.
randomradio said:
Central Europe is still the go-to zone for invasions.
Click to expand...
Makes zero sense. Napoleon invaded from Lithuania.
randomradio said:
Your IQ was always low to begin with.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one treating complete dogsh1t as fact. Even this debate is stupid, a NATO invasion of Russia immediately leads to nuclear war, which is why it will never happen, or one of many reasons really. I can name 4 Russian annexations from the last 30 years and 3 from the last 15 years. Now you provide a list of NATO annexations, and by annexation I mean invasion and annexation (i.e. subsuming the territory as part of a NATO country) via force.


https://twitter.com/x/status/1712764181856845916
 
Last edited:
BMD said:
People who deliberately execute babies and rape children and film themselves doing it can't have any support.
Click to expand...
And what about those who kill several brown Canadian children by bombing their aeroplane? Why are they allowed to be celebrated in UK? or Canada?

1697232490436.png


The one on the left --- Parmar, the founder of BKL and perpetrator of 1985 bombing.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: suryakiran and jetray
BMD said:
This contradicts your original point wrt 'heart of Russia'. The winter defeated Napoleon, the Russian Army had little to do with it.
Click to expand...

The point being he incorrectly thought taking Moscow would mean victory, the same mistake you have made concerning St. Petersburg.

BMD said:
Makes zero sense. Napoleon invaded from Lithuania.
Click to expand...

Sure. The genius was headed towards Moscow.

BMD said:
I'm not the one treating complete dogsh1t as fact. Even this debate is stupid, a NATO invasion of Russia immediately leads to nuclear war, which is why it will never happen, or one of many reasons really. I can name 4 Russian annexations from the last 30 years and 3 from the last 15 years. Now you provide a list of NATO annexations, and by annexation I mean invasion and annexation (i.e. subsuming the territory as part of a NATO country) via force.


https://twitter.com/x/status/1712764181856845916
Click to expand...

Nuclear war has nothing to do with the invasion itself, both can happen side by side. Even if there is a nuclear war, armies will continue fighting, it's not the endgame.

NATO does that by buying countries and toppling regimes. There is no need to physically control territories anymore. Basically NATO uses neo-colonialism and Russia uses imperialism. Nothing's changed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom